Skip to content

Does Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Alleviate The Pain Experienced During Bone Marrow Sampling?

Does Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Alleviate The Pain Experienced During Bone Marrow Sampling in Addition to Standard Techniques?A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02005354
Acronym
TENS
Enrollment
70
Registered
2013-12-09
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2019-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Pain, Bone marrow aspiration, trephine biopsy

Brief summary

The approach of this study will be to answer the question does high-frequency stimulation Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) alleviate the pain experienced during the bone marrow sampling procedure in addition to the standard analgesia given (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide). Null hypothesis: TENS does not alleviate the pain experienced during the bone marrow sampling procedure in addition to the standard analgesia given

Detailed description

Patients in whom a bone marrow biopsy is planned will be randomised to one of two groups - a control-TENS group where the TENS machine will be set at the lowest sensory threshold and an intervention-TENS group where the TENS machine will be set at a recognised analgesic level (\>50 Hertz (Hz) and below the pain threshold for the patient) (Bennett et al. 2011). The identity of the TENS type will be concealed from both the patient and the doctor performing the biopsy. The primary outcome will be pain and this will be recorded by the patient immediately after the procedure using a validated numerical scale (0-10). All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide). The benefit of this study is to establish whether or not TENS can benefit patients as an additional, safe, non-invasive and inexpensive method of pain relief during this frequently painful procedure.

Interventions

DEVICETrans-cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Patients in whom a bone marrow biopsy is planned will be randomised to one of two groups - a Placebo Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at the lowest sensory threshold and an Active Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at a recognised analgesic level (\>50Hz and below the pain threshold for the patient).

DRUGStandard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)

All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)

Sponsors

Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * Male or Female, aged 18 years or above. * Participants are those medical patients seen in the haematology outpatients clinic for whom a bone-marrow trephine biopsy is deemed necessary either for diagnosis, staging or disease monitoring purposes. Participants are either new patients or routine follow ups. * Participant is able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements. * Participant is willing to allow his or her General Practitioner to be notified of participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Any known adverse reaction to high-frequency TENS or electrode gel pads * Any significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible PainPost procedure and 24 hoursTo establish the effect of high-frequency stimulation TENS on the pain experienced by patients undergoing a bone-marrow biopsy, using standard technique with local anaesthetic. The perception of pain will be measured using a pain scale directly after and 24 hours after bone-marrow sampling in patients randomly allocated and blinded to the use of intervention-TENS (IT) or control-TENS (CT) in addition to local anaesthesia.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

70 patients were randomised, thirty five patients received TENS impulses at a strong but comfortable amplitude (intervention group) and 35 patients received TENS impulses just above the sensory threshold (control group)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TENS Intervention
The concealed electrical parameter in this group will be within the therapeutic window, that is, well above the sensory detection threshold but below the pain threshold giving a strong but comfortable sensation. From previous studies, this is likely to be 50-110Hz. The device will be activated prior to entry into the treatment room and 2 minutes before administration of local anaesthetic and for 2 minutes after removal of the biopsy needle. This will cover the expected duration of pain as assessed in the pilot study. All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)
35
TENS Placebo Comparator
Placebo Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at the lowest sensory threshold and an Active Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at a recognised analgesic level (\>50Hz and below the pain threshold for the patient). Standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide): All patients will receive standard pain
35
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTENS InterventionTENS Placebo ComparatorTotal
Age, Continuous68 years69 years69 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants18 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants17 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Perception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain

To establish the effect of high-frequency stimulation TENS on the pain experienced by patients undergoing a bone-marrow biopsy, using standard technique with local anaesthetic. The perception of pain will be measured using a pain scale directly after and 24 hours after bone-marrow sampling in patients randomly allocated and blinded to the use of intervention-TENS (IT) or control-TENS (CT) in addition to local anaesthesia.

Time frame: Post procedure and 24 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
TENS InterventionPerception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible PainMean Pain Score immediately post procedure5.6 Numerical Pain Severity Scale (0-10)
TENS InterventionPerception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible PainMean pain score 24 hours post procedure1.9 Numerical Pain Severity Scale (0-10)
TENS Placebo ComparatorPerception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible PainMean Pain Score immediately post procedure5.7 Numerical Pain Severity Scale (0-10)
TENS Placebo ComparatorPerception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible PainMean pain score 24 hours post procedure1.9 Numerical Pain Severity Scale (0-10)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026