Multiple Myeloma in Relapse
Conditions
Brief summary
This randomized phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of pomalidomide and ixazomib when given together with dexamethasone and to see how well pomalidomide and dexamethasone with or without ixazomib works in treating patients with multiple myeloma that has come back. Biological therapies, such as pomalidomide and dexamethasone, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. Ixazomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether pomalidomide and dexamethasone are more effective with or without ixazomib in treating multiple myeloma.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for combination therapy pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib. (Phase I) II. To assess whether the combination of pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib improves progression-free survival (PFS) relative to pomalidomide/dexamethasone. (Phase II) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). (Phase I) II. To analyze type and grade of all serious adverse events (SAEs). (Phase I) III. To analyze type and grade of all adverse events (AEs). (Phase I) IV. To analyze the reason for and incidence of dose modifications/omissions/delays. (Phase I) V. To assess preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy. (Phase I) VI. To assess whether the overall response rate (ORR), partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR) or stringent CR (sCR) rate differ with respect to treatment regimen. (Phase II) VII. To assess the clinical benefit rate (CBR: minimal response \[MR\] + ORR) for pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib compared to pomalidomide/dexamethasone. (Phase II) VIII. To assess the disease control rate (DCR: stable disease \[SD\] + CBR) for pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib compared to pomalidomide/dexamethasone. (Phase II) IX. For those patients achieving a PR or better, we will assess whether the combination of pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib increases the duration of response (DOR) compared to pomalidomide/dexamethasone. (Phase II) X. To assess whether the combination of pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib improves overall survival (OS) compared to those taking pomalidomide/dexamethasone alone. (Phase II) XI. To assess time to next treatment (TNT) for patients taking pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib compared to those on pomalidomide/dexamethasone. (Phase II) XII. To evaluate the safety of pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib compared with pomalidomide/dexamethasone. (Phase II) XIII. For patients on the pomalidomide/dexamethasone arm who opt to cross-over to the pomalidomide/dexamethasone/ixazomib arm, assessment of response rate (ORR, CBR, DCR), DOR, TNT, PFS and OS will be evaluated from date of cross-over. (Phase II) XIV. To determine if baseline level of perceived fatigue and overall quality of life (QOL) is associated with OS. (Phase II) OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of pomalidomide and ixazomib followed by a phase II study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 4 weeks until disease progression and then every 3 months for 3 years.
Interventions
given PO
given PO
given PO
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma; relapsed disease is myeloma that has previously responded to prior therapy (MR or better) and subsequently progressed * Patient must have measurable disease or non-measurable disease, defined as one or more of the following holding true: * Measurable disease: * Serum M-protein \>= 1.0 g/dL (\>= 0.5 g/dL for IgA or IgM myeloma) and/or * Urine M-protein \>= 200 mg/24 hours and/or * Involved serum free light chain level \>= 10 mg/dL AND an abnormal serum free light chain ratio * For non-measurable disease: * Baseline marrow burden of myeloma of at least 30% * Progression on lenalidomide as part of first line therapy (lenalidomide-refractory disease) \* Lenalidomide-refractory disease is defined as disease progression on or progression within 60 days of the last dose of a lenalidomide-based treatment; patients should have received at least 2 cycles of a lenalidomide-based regimen to be evaluable for refractoriness; examples: 1) progression on lenalidomide maintenance therapy after initial induction +/- consolidation; 2) initial response followed by progression on continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone +/- elotuzumab or daratumumab * Pomalidomide naive disease * Proteasome inhibitor naive or sensitive disease; proteasome inhibitor sensitive disease is defined as a PR or better to prior proteasome inhibitor-based therapy that is maintained for \>= 60 days from the last dose of the proteasome inhibitor \* A patient who receives induction therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone and achieves a PR or better but subsequently progresses on continued lenalidomide or lenalidomide-dexamethasone would be eligible provided the progression occurs 60 days or more after discontinuation of the bortezomib; similarly, ixazomib exposure is allowed provided they meet the definition of proteasome inhibitor sensitive disease * 1 prior line of systemic therapy for multiple myeloma, where a line of therapy for myeloma is defined as 1 or more planned cycles of single agent or combination therapy, as well as a planned series of treatment regimens administered in a sequential manner (e.g. lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone induction therapy for 4 cycles followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and then lenalidomide maintenance therapy would be considered 1 line of prior therapy); a new line of therapy begins when a planned therapy is modified to include other treatment agents (alone or in combination) as a result of disease progression, disease relapse or treatment-related toxicity (e.g. a patient is progressing in the face of lenalidomide maintenance therapy and has bortezomib and dexamethasone added into their regimen); a new line of therapy also begins when a planned treatment-free interval is interrupted by the need to start treatment due to disease relapse/progression (e.g. a patient with relapsed myeloma achieves a partial response after a planned 8 cycles of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone, enjoys an 8-month period off therapy but then experiences disease progression requiring re-initiation of therapy) * Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is allowed provided the patient is \>= 1 year from transplant at time of registration, is not on immunosuppressive therapy to treat/prevent graft-versus-host disease, has no evidence of active graft versus host disease, and no evidence of active infection * No other chemotherapy or radiation therapy within 14 days prior to registration * No investigational therapy within 14 days prior to registration * No major surgery within 28 days prior to registration * No G-CSF (filgrastim) or GM-CSF (sargramostim) within 7 days of registration or pegfilgrastim within 14 days of registration to meet eligibility criteria * No platelet transfusions within 7 days of registration to meet eligibility criteria; Note: red blood cell transfusions are allowed at any time * A female of childbearing potential is a sexually mature female who: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months) * Women of childbearing potential: * Must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test with a sensitivity of at least 25 mlU/ml no more than 14 days prior to registration and must agree to repeat this test within 24 hours of starting pomalidomide * Must either commit to complete abstinence from heterosexual contact or begin TWO acceptable methods of birth control, one highly effective method and one additional effective (barrier) method, AT THE SAME TIME, before starting pomalidomide * Must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing * Must agree to not become pregnant or breast feed a child during treatment on this protocol * Men must practice complete abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a female of childbearing potential, even if they have had a successful vasectomy * Note: All participants must be counseled at a minimum of every 28 days about pregnancy precautions and risks of fetal exposure * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1.0 x 10\^9/L * Platelet count \>= 50 x 10\^9/L * Calculated (Calc.) creatinine clearance \>= 30 mL/min; calculated utilizing the Cockcroft-Gault formula or 24-hour urine collection * Total bilirubin \< 1.5 x upper limits of normal (ULN) * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 2.5 x upper limits of normal (ULN) * Note: G-CSF and platelet transfusions cannot be used to increase counts to meet eligibility criteria * Patients cannot have: * Central nerve system involvement * Primary refractory multiple myeloma, where primary refractory multiple myeloma is defined as disease that is nonresponsive - patients who have never achieved a minimal response (MR) or better - with any therapy over the course of their disease; it includes patients who never achieve MR or better in whom there is no significant change in M-protein and no evidence of clinical progression as well as patients who meet criteria for true progressive disease (PD) * Primary or secondary plasma cell leukemia * Light-chain (AL) amyloidosis or polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome * Known active hepatitis C based on: * +hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (confirmed) * +HCV RNA * Liver disease with history of positive serology * Note: patients with a prior history of hepatitis C that has been successfully eradicated with antiviral therapy are eligible * Known hepatitis B surface antigen positivity * Previous hypersensitivity to any of the components of the study treatment * Prior history of erythema multiforme with thalidomide or lenalidomide treatment * =\< grade 2 peripheral neuropathy * Adequate cardiac function, defined as: * No electrocardiogram (EKG) evidence of acute ischemia * No EKG evidence of active, clinically significant conduction system abnormalities * No EKG evidence of \> grade 2 (\> 480 ms) corrected QT (QTc) prolongation * Prior to study entry, any EKG abnormality at screening not felt to put the patient at risk has to be documented by the investigator as not medically significant * No uncontrolled angina or severe ventricular arrhythmias * No clinically significant pericardial disease * No history of myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to registration * No class 3 or higher New York Heart Association congestive heart failure * No strong inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 or CYP1A2 or strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 or CYP1A2 within 14 days prior to registration * Note: Ixazomib is a substrate of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 * Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are eligible, provided they meet the following: * No history of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining conditions or other HIV related illness * Cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ cells nadirs \> 350/mm\^3 within 28 days prior to registration * Treatment sensitive HIV and, if on anti-HIV therapy, HIV viral load \< 50 copies/mm\^3 within 28 days prior to registration * Note: HIV+ patients who enroll on this study and are assigned to treatment with ixazomib may need to modify their anti-retroviral therapy prior to receiving protocol therapy if they are on strong inducers or potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): Patients randomized to Arm 1 may opt to switch to the 3-drug regimen following disease progression; these patients must be re-registered to the study and meet the eligibility criteria below * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): Patient must have measurable disease or non-measurable disease after progression on pomalidomide + dexamethasone, defined as one or more of the following holding true: \* Measurable disease: * Serum M-protein \>= 0.5 g/dL and/or * Urine M-protein \>= 200 mg/24 hours and/or * Involved serum free light chain level \>= 10 mg/dL AND an abnormal serum free light chain ratio \* For non-measurable disease: * Marrow burden of myeloma of at least 30% * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): * Women of childbearing potential: \*\* Must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to re-registration \*\* Must either commit to complete abstinence from heterosexual contact or begin TWO acceptable methods of birth control, one highly effective method and one additional effective (barrier) method, AT THE SAME TIME, before starting pomalidomide \*\* Must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing \*\* Must agree to not become pregnant or breast feed a child during treatment on this protocol * Men must practice complete abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a female of childbearing potential, even if they have had a successful vasectomy * Note: All participants must be counseled at a minimum of every 28 days about pregnancy precautions and risks of fetal exposure * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): ECOG performance status 0-2 * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1.0 x 10\^9/L * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): Platelet count \>= 50 x 10\^9/L * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): Calc. creatinine clearance \>= 30 mL/min \* Calculated utilizing the Cockcroft-Gault formula or 24-hour urine collection * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): Total bilirubin \< 1.5 x upper limits of normal (ULN) * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): AST and ALT \< 2.5 x upper limits of normal (ULN) * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): Note: G-CSF and platelet transfusions cannot be used to increase counts to meet eligibility criteria * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): =\< grade 2 peripheral neuropathy * RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STEP 2): No strong inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 or CYP1A2 or strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 or CYP1A2 \* Note: Ixazomib is a substrate of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 28 days | For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined by the following adverse events at least possibly related to study therapy: Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Alopecia is not expected but would not be considered a DLT. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be adequately managed with optimal supportive care. Grade 3 or 4 hyperglycemia due to dexamethasone will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be controlled with appropriate therapy Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Grade 4 lymphopenia is expected with this regimen and will not be construed as a DLT. Grade 4 neutropenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days despite appropriate supportive care. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days or is associated with greater then or equal to grade 3 bleeding event |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II) | 3 years | progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization to the date the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria for disease progression is met. If a patient initiates another anti-cancer treatment prior to disease progression, they will be censored at the date of initiation of this treatment. Patients will be randomized to treatment using the Pocock-Simon algorithm balancing the distribution of the following stratification factors between the two treatment arms: 1) ISS 1-2 disease vs. ISS 3 disease (current ISS stage based off screening beta 2 microglobulin and albumin) 2) High risk cytogenetics features: yes vs. no High risk cytogenetics features include: del(1p), gain of 1q, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14; 20), del(17p) 3) Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor: yes vs. no |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) | 3 years | ORR is defined as partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria |
| Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) | 3 years | Disease response status is based on the IMWG criteria being held for two consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is defined as proportion of patients with minimal response (MR) and better according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II) |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR), Defined as Stable Disease (SD) and Better According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II) | 42 days | Proportion of patients that went two of more cycles of treatment without discontinuing treatment for progression or intolerability. |
| Duration of Response (DOR), Calculated for All Patients Achieving an Objective Response, Partial Response (PR) or Better (Phase II) | Up to 3 years | — |
| Overall Survival (OS) (Phase II) | 2 years | Overall survival was analyzed from the time of registration to the date of death or last known date living. Due to median OS time not being reached due to lack of deaths at the time of this report by either arm, the 2 year OS rate has been reported. This analysis censors living patients at 2 years. |
| Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 44.5 months | These events are reported in the adverse events section of this report. |
| Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II) | 92 months | The count of paitents that experenced an adverse event is reported in this section. A full table of these events is reported in the adverse event section of this report. |
| Response Rates (Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II) | Up to 3 years | — |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II) | Up to 3 years post-registration (at crossover) | — |
| Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II) | baseline | Pre-treatment patient-report of fatigue and overall quality of life (based on a 10-point Likert scale). A higher number indicates a better quality of life where 10 is the best outcome and 0 is the worst. |
| Time to Next Treatment (TNT) (Phase II) | Up to 3 years post-registration | — |
| Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I) | 39 months | — |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Patients receive pomalidomide PO QD on days 1-21 and dexamethasone PO QD on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients achieving disease progression may cross over to Arm II. | 45 |
| Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) Patients receive pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and ixazomib as in Phase I. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | 47 |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 A 3 + 3 phase I dose escalation design was used to examine the safety profile and establish the MTD of IXA when given in combination with POM-DEX. Protocol therapy was administered over a 28-day cycle. IXA was given at a dose of 2.3 up to 4 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15; POM at 2 up to 4 mg daily by mouth on days 1-21; and DEX 20 mg (age \> 75 years) or 40 mg (age ≤ 75) by mouth on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (Table 1). A new cycle of treatment was not to begin until the ANC was ≥ 1.0 × 109/L, platelets ≥ 50 × 109/L, and all other adverse events (AEs) had improved to grade 1 or baseline. Treatment continued until PD, the emergence of unacceptable toxicity, or patient request to discontinue protocol treatment. Dose Level 1 was 2mg POM-DEX and 3mg IXA. | 3 |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 A 3 + 3 phase I dose escalation design was used to examine the safety profile and establish the MTD of IXA when given in combination with POM-DEX. Protocol therapy was administered over a 28-day cycle. IXA was given at a dose of 2.3 up to 4 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15; POM at 2 up to 4 mg daily by mouth on days 1-21; and DEX 20 mg (age \> 75 years) or 40 mg (age ≤ 75) by mouth on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (Table 1). A new cycle of treatment was not to begin until the ANC was ≥ 1.0 × 109/L, platelets ≥ 50 × 109/L, and all other adverse events (AEs) had improved to grade 1 or baseline. Treatment continued until PD, the emergence of unacceptable toxicity, or patient request to discontinue protocol treatment. Dose Level 2 was 3mg POM-DEX and 3mg IXA. | 5 |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 3 A 3 + 3 phase I dose escalation design was used to examine the safety profile and establish the MTD of IXA when given in combination with POM-DEX. Protocol therapy was administered over a 28-day cycle. IXA was given at a dose of 2.3 up to 4 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15; POM at 2 up to 4 mg daily by mouth on days 1-21; and DEX 20 mg (age \> 75 years) or 40 mg (age ≤ 75) by mouth on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (Table 1). A new cycle of treatment was not to begin until the ANC was ≥ 1.0 × 109/L, platelets ≥ 50 × 109/L, and all other adverse events (AEs) had improved to grade 1 or baseline. Treatment continued until PD, the emergence of unacceptable toxicity, or patient request to discontinue protocol treatment. Dose Level 3 was 4mg POM-DEX and 3mg IXA. | 7 |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 4 A 3 + 3 phase I dose escalation design was used to examine the safety profile and establish the MTD of IXA when given in combination with POM-DEX. Protocol therapy was administered over a 28-day cycle. IXA was given at a dose of 2.3 up to 4 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15; POM at 2 up to 4 mg daily by mouth on days 1-21; and DEX 20 mg (age \> 75 years) or 40 mg (age ≤ 75) by mouth on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (Table 1). A new cycle of treatment was not to begin until the ANC was ≥ 1.0 × 109/L, platelets ≥ 50 × 109/L, and all other adverse events (AEs) had improved to grade 1 or baseline. Treatment continued until PD, the emergence of unacceptable toxicity, or patient request to discontinue protocol treatment. Dose Level 4 was 4mg POM-DEX and 4mg IXA. | 11 |
| Total | 118 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Ineligible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Phase 1 | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Phase 2 Part 1 | Ineligible | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Phase 2 Part 2 | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) | Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | Phase 1 Dose Level 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 66 years | 65 years | 67 years | 64.0 years | 63 years | 65 years | 69 years |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 97 Participants | 33 Participants | 43 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 13 Participants | 8 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 13 Participants | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 97 Participants | 37 Participants | 39 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 52 Participants | 17 Participants | 25 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 66 Participants | 28 Participants | 22 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 7 / 45 | 22 / 76 | 1 / 3 | 4 / 5 | 4 / 7 | 7 / 11 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 45 / 45 | 76 / 76 | 3 / 3 | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6 | 11 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 22 / 45 | 33 / 76 | 2 / 3 | 2 / 4 | 4 / 6 | 6 / 11 |
Outcome results
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I)
For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined by the following adverse events at least possibly related to study therapy: Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Alopecia is not expected but would not be considered a DLT. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be adequately managed with optimal supportive care. Grade 3 or 4 hyperglycemia due to dexamethasone will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be controlled with appropriate therapy Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Grade 4 lymphopenia is expected with this regimen and will not be construed as a DLT. Grade 4 neutropenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days despite appropriate supportive care. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days or is associated with greater then or equal to grade 3 bleeding event
Time frame: 28 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 0 participants with DLT |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 0 participants with DLT |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 1 participants with DLT |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 1 participants with DLT |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II)
progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization to the date the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria for disease progression is met. If a patient initiates another anti-cancer treatment prior to disease progression, they will be censored at the date of initiation of this treatment. Patients will be randomized to treatment using the Pocock-Simon algorithm balancing the distribution of the following stratification factors between the two treatment arms: 1) ISS 1-2 disease vs. ISS 3 disease (current ISS stage based off screening beta 2 microglobulin and albumin) 2) High risk cytogenetics features: yes vs. no High risk cytogenetics features include: del(1p), gain of 1q, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14; 20), del(17p) 3) Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor: yes vs. no
Time frame: 3 years
Population: All eligible phase 2 patients were included in this analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II) | 228 days |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II) | 619 days |
Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II)
Pre-treatment patient-report of fatigue and overall quality of life (based on a 10-point Likert scale). A higher number indicates a better quality of life where 10 is the best outcome and 0 is the worst.
Time frame: baseline
Population: All patients that completed and returned the QoL survey
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II) | High QoL(7-10) | 21 participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II) | Medium or Low QoL (0-7) | 16 participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II) | Medium or Low QoL (0-7) | 11 participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II) | High QoL(7-10) | 27 participants |
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Disease response status is based on the IMWG criteria being held for two consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is defined as proportion of patients with minimal response (MR) and better according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II)
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) | .564 proportion of participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) | .737 proportion of participants |
Disease Control Rate (DCR), Defined as Stable Disease (SD) and Better According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II)
Proportion of patients that went two of more cycles of treatment without discontinuing treatment for progression or intolerability.
Time frame: 42 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Disease Control Rate (DCR), Defined as Stable Disease (SD) and Better According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II) | .949 proportion of partcipants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Disease Control Rate (DCR), Defined as Stable Disease (SD) and Better According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II) | .921 proportion of partcipants |
Duration of Response (DOR), Calculated for All Patients Achieving an Objective Response, Partial Response (PR) or Better (Phase II)
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Population: All eligible phase 2 responders
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Duration of Response (DOR), Calculated for All Patients Achieving an Objective Response, Partial Response (PR) or Better (Phase II) | 12.3 Months |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Duration of Response (DOR), Calculated for All Patients Achieving an Objective Response, Partial Response (PR) or Better (Phase II) | 23.7 Months |
Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I)
These events are reported in the adverse events section of this report.
Time frame: 44.5 months
Population: All enrolled phase 1 patients that were eligible and treated per protocol were evaluated for dose limiting toxicities. This excludes two dose level 2 patients, one dose level 3 patient and 5 dose level 4 patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 0 participants with DLT |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 0 participants with DLT |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 1 participants with DLT |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I) | 1 participants with DLT |
Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I)
Time frame: 39 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I) | 2 Participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I) | 3 Participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I) | 6 Participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I) | 5 Participants |
Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II)
The count of paitents that experenced an adverse event is reported in this section. A full table of these events is reported in the adverse event section of this report.
Time frame: 92 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II) | 22 Participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II) | 33 Participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II) | 2 Participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II) | 2 Participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II) | 4 Participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II) | 6 Participants |
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria
Time frame: 3 years
Population: All eligible and treated Phase II patients were included in analysis. Phase I patients were excluded from response analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | .436 proportion of participants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | .632 proportion of participants |
Overall Survival (OS) (Phase II)
Overall survival was analyzed from the time of registration to the date of death or last known date living. Due to median OS time not being reached due to lack of deaths at the time of this report by either arm, the 2 year OS rate has been reported. This analysis censors living patients at 2 years.
Time frame: 2 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Overall Survival (OS) (Phase II) | .795 proportion of patients alive |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | Overall Survival (OS) (Phase II) | .784 proportion of patients alive |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II)
Time frame: Up to 3 years post-registration (at crossover)
Population: Arm 1 patients that chose to crossover to Arm 2 treatment (add IXA treatment).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Progression Free Survival (PFS) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II) | 5.6 months |
Response Rates (Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II)
Time frame: Up to 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Response Rates (Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II) | Overall Response Rate | .231 proportion of partcipants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Response Rates (Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II) | Clinical Benefit Rate | .269 proportion of partcipants |
| Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | Response Rates (Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II) | Disease Control Rate | .962 proportion of partcipants |
Time to Next Treatment (TNT) (Phase II)
Time frame: Up to 3 years post-registration