Skip to content

Positive Psychology to Improve Healthy Behaviors After an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Study of a Positive Psychology Program to Improve Healthy Behaviors After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Proof of Concept Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02004158
Acronym
PEACE II
Enrollment
23
Registered
2013-12-06
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2017-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

Acute coronary syndrome, Health behavior, Mental health

Brief summary

In this proof-of-concept study, the investigators will assess the ease and usefulness of a positive psychology program in patients with acute coronary syndrome and less-than-optimal adherence to health behaviors. The investigators believe that positive psychology (a field that studies boosting positive emotions rather than simply reducing negative emotions) will help this cardiac population to be more healthy. The investigators want to determine whether this positive psychology program has the potential to be an adjunctive treatment for cardiac populations.

Interventions

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients admitted to one of three cardiac inpatient units at Massachusetts General Hospital. * Primary diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction or unstable angina). * Less-than-optimal adherence to health behaviors. This will be defined as a mean score of less than 15 on the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (scores range from 3-18, with higher scores indicating better adherence).

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive deficits, assessed via a 6-item cognitive screen used to assess appropriate participation of medically-ill patients in research studies. * Patients not prescribed aspirin at discharge. * Inability to communicate in English. * Inability to participate in physical activity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Exercise Completion8 weeksRate of exercise completion will be measured by the number of participants who have a good rate of completion of exercises. There are 8 exercises in total. A good rate of completion will be defined as an average of 5 or more exercises completed per subject.
Ease of Exercises8 weeksEase of exercises will be measured by a self-report 10-point Likert scale (0=not easy to complete, 10=very easy to complete). Ease will be defined as an average score of 6 or more on this scale.
Self-reported Psychological Impact of Exercises8 weeksPsychological impact of exercises will be measured by two self-reported 10-point Likert scales. One scale measures optimism after completing the exercise (0=not optimistic, 10=very optimistic), and the other scale measures happiness after completing the exercise (0=not happy, 10=very happy). Psychological impact will be defined as an average score of 6 or more on both of these scales.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Psychological Impact of Exercises8 weeksObject psychological impact of exercises will be measured by clinician-administered questionnaires given at baseline and again at 8 weeks. These questionnaires include: 1. Life Orientation Test-Revised (scores range from 6-30; a high score means higher optimism) 2. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (scores range from 10-50; a higher score means higher levels of affect) 3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (scores range from 0-42; a high score means higher depression and anxiety). Objective psychological impact will be defined as having significantly improved scores at 8 weeks as compared to scores at baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Positive Psychology
Positive psychology intervention
23
Total23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPositive Psychology
Age, Continuous60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Ease of Exercises

Ease of exercises will be measured by a self-report 10-point Likert scale (0=not easy to complete, 10=very easy to complete). Ease will be defined as an average score of 6 or more on this scale.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Positive PsychologyEase of Exercises7.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Primary

Rate of Exercise Completion

Rate of exercise completion will be measured by the number of participants who have a good rate of completion of exercises. There are 8 exercises in total. A good rate of completion will be defined as an average of 5 or more exercises completed per subject.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Positive PsychologyRate of Exercise Completion17 Participants
Primary

Self-reported Psychological Impact of Exercises

Psychological impact of exercises will be measured by two self-reported 10-point Likert scales. One scale measures optimism after completing the exercise (0=not optimistic, 10=very optimistic), and the other scale measures happiness after completing the exercise (0=not happy, 10=very happy). Psychological impact will be defined as an average score of 6 or more on both of these scales.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Positive PsychologySelf-reported Psychological Impact of ExercisesOptimism7.9 pointsStandard Deviation 1.5
Positive PsychologySelf-reported Psychological Impact of ExercisesHappiness8.0 pointsStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Objective Psychological Impact of Exercises

Object psychological impact of exercises will be measured by clinician-administered questionnaires given at baseline and again at 8 weeks. These questionnaires include: 1. Life Orientation Test-Revised (scores range from 6-30; a high score means higher optimism) 2. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (scores range from 10-50; a higher score means higher levels of affect) 3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (scores range from 0-42; a high score means higher depression and anxiety). Objective psychological impact will be defined as having significantly improved scores at 8 weeks as compared to scores at baseline.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Positive PsychologyObjective Psychological Impact of ExercisesLOT-R23.5 pointsStandard Deviation 4.8
Positive PsychologyObjective Psychological Impact of ExercisesHADS13.4 pointsStandard Deviation 8.9
Positive PsychologyObjective Psychological Impact of ExercisesPANAS35.1 pointsStandard Deviation 7.9
Positive PsychologyObjective Psychological Impact of ExercisesHADS9.0 pointsStandard Deviation 5.6
Positive PsychologyObjective Psychological Impact of ExercisesLOT-R23.0 pointsStandard Deviation 5.8
Positive PsychologyObjective Psychological Impact of ExercisesPANAS38.2 pointsStandard Deviation 8.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026