Skip to content

Post Approval Study of the TS Feature With the 530G Pump System Supplemented With Commercial Patient Data

Post Approval Study of the TS (Threshold Suspend) Feature With a Sensor-Augmented Pump System Supplemented With Commercial Patient Data

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02003898
Enrollment
372
Registered
2013-12-06
Start date
2013-11-26
Completion date
2018-02-20
Last updated
2019-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Keywords

Diabetes, Insulin pump, Threshold Suspend

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Threshold Suspend (TS) feature of the Medtronic MiniMed® 530G insulin pump in patients 16 and older with insulin requiring diabetes.

Detailed description

Multi-center trial is initiated to observe the Threshold Suspend (TS) feature with a sensor-augmented insulin pump (Medtronic MiniMed® 530G insulin pump) in patients 16 and older with insulin requiring diabetes over a period of one year.

Interventions

DEVICEMedtronic MiniMed 530G Insulin Pump

Sponsors

Medtronic Diabetes
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All subjects are assigned to treatment with the Medtronic 530G Insulin Pump

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is age 16 or older at time of screening 2. Subject has been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus for at least one year prior to screening. 3. Subject is currently on pump therapy. 4. Subject is transitioning to the 530G insulin pump system with the TS feature turned ON. 5. Subject is willing to complete all study related activities 6. Subject is willing to upload data every 21 days from the study pump 7. Subject must have Internet access and access to a computer system that meets the requirements for uploading the pumps. This may include use of family or friend's computer system with Internet access. 8. Subject is able (by insurance or financial means) to cover the initial investment and ongoing cost of the 530G insulin pump and consumables, CGM, Bayer CONTOUR Next Link RF enabled meter and supplies for the length of the study- 1 year.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject is actively participating in an investigational study (drug or device) wherein he/she has received treatment from an investigational study drug or investigational study devices in the last 2 weeks. 2. Subject is a woman of child-bearing potential who has a positive pregnancy test at screening or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study 3. Subject is being treated for hyperthyroidism at time of screening 4. Subject has an abnormality (\>1.8mg/dL) in creatinine at time of screening visit 5. Subject has an abnormality (out of reference range) in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) at time of screening visit. If TSH is out of range, Free T3 and Free T4 will be tested. Subject may be included with TSH out of range as long as Free T3 and Free T4 are in normal reference range. 6. Subject has taken any oral, injectable, or IV steroids within 8 weeks from time of screening visit, or plans to take any oral, injectable, or IV steroids during the course of the study 7. Subject is currently abusing illicit drugs 8. Subject is currently abusing prescription drugs 9. Subject is currently abusing alcohol 10. Subject has sickle cell disease or hemoglobinopathy 11. Subject has received red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to time of screening or plans to receive red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin over the course of study participation 12. Subject diagnosed with current eating disorder such as anorexia or bulimia 13. Subject has been diagnosed with chronic kidney disease that results in chronic anemia 14. Subject is on dialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year1 yearComparison of A1C measurement from baseline to end of study in the CEP266 study population. The overall mean change in A1C from baseline will be estimated and compared by a non-inferiority test with an A1C margin of 0.4% and a significance level of 0.025 (one-sided) with the CEP 266 study population.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c Below 7%1 yearMean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, for subjects with baseline A1c below 7%.
Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c of 7% to 9%1 yearMean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, for subjects with Baseline A1c of 7% to 9%
Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c > 9%1 yearMean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 year, for subjects with Baseline A1c \> 9%

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Medtronic MiniMed 530G Insulin Pump
All subjects received diabetes treatment using the Medtronic MiniMed 530G insulin pump. Medtronic MiniMed 530G Insulin Pump
372
Total372

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMedtronic MiniMed 530G Insulin Pump
Age, Continuous45.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
351 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
372 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
201 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
171 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 372
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 372
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 372

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year

Comparison of A1C measurement from baseline to end of study in the CEP266 study population. The overall mean change in A1C from baseline will be estimated and compared by a non-inferiority test with an A1C margin of 0.4% and a significance level of 0.025 (one-sided) with the CEP 266 study population.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Among the 372 enrolled subjects, 298 had both baseline and end of study A1c.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Medtronic MiniMed 530G Insulin PumpMean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year0.034 percentage
95% CI: [-0.03, 0.098]
Secondary

Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c > 9%

Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 year, for subjects with Baseline A1c \> 9%

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medtronic MiniMed 530G Insulin PumpMean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c > 9%-0.39 percentageStandard Deviation 0.96
Secondary

Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c Below 7%

Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, for subjects with baseline A1c below 7%.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medtronic MiniMed 530G Insulin PumpMean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c Below 7%0.32 percentageStandard Deviation 0.53
Secondary

Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c of 7% to 9%

Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, for subjects with Baseline A1c of 7% to 9%

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medtronic MiniMed 530G Insulin PumpMean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Baseline A1c of 7% to 9%-0.04 percentageStandard Deviation 0.67

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026