Skip to content

Long Term Safety Study of SyB C-1101 in Patients With Recurrent/Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) - Extension Study

Phase I Clinical Trial of SyB C-1101 in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome - Extension Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02002936
Enrollment
1
Registered
2013-12-06
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Brief summary

This is an extension study to investigate long term safety and efficacy of SyB C-1101 when orally administered every 3 weeks, twice daily for 14 consecutive days to the patients who have completed 6 cycles in the study 2012002 whose purpose is to investigate tolerability of SyB C-1101 when administered orally in patients with recurrent/relapsed or refractory myelodysplastic syndrome.

Interventions

SyB C-1101(rigosertib sodium) will be administered orally twice daily for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7-day observation period. The treatment period of 21 days (14 days of administration + 7 days of observation) constitutes 1 cycle. The dose at cycle 6 in the study 2012002 will be the dose (if needed, the dose can be reduced) at the first cycle in this study (cycle 7). From cycle 8 on, the dose of SyB C-1101 will be reduced, delayed, or discontinued according to adverse events and results of observation at the previous cycle.

Sponsors

SymBio Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must satisfy the following conditions listed below. 1. Patients enrolled in the study 2012002 of SyB C-1101 in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome. 2. Patients who were not judged as disease progression\* nor progressive disease/relapse\*\* at the end of the cycle 6 in the study 2012002. \* hematologic remission according to IWG 2006 criteria \*\* hematologic improvement according to IWG 2006 criteria 3. Patients who met the continuation criteria\*\*\* after Cycle 6 week 3 (Day 22±3) in the study 2012002. \*\*\*defined in the study 2012002 protocol 4.5 Criteria for Transition to the Next Cycle 4. Patients who can be expected to survive at least three months or longer. 5. Patients who have score of 0 to 2 in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS). 6. Patients with adequate function in major organs (heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, etc.). * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): no more than 3.0 times the upper boundary of the reference range at each institution * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): no more than 3.0 times the upper boundary of the reference range at each institution * Total bilirubin: no more than 1.5 times the upper boundary of the reference range at each institution * Serum creatinine: no more than 1.5 times the upper boundary of the reference range at each institution * ECG: no abnormal findings requiring treatment * Echocardiography: no abnormal findings requiring treatment 7. Patients who personally signed an informed consent document for participation in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who satisfy any of the following conditions after Cycle 6 week 3 (Day 22±3) in the study 2012002 will not be enrolled in the study. 1. Patients with anemia caused by factors other than MDS(hemolytic anemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, etc.). 2. Patients with obvious infectious diseases (including viral infections). 3. Patients with serious complications (liver failure, renal failure, etc.). 4. Patients with a complication of serious heart disease (myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, etc.) 5. Patients with a serious gastrointestinal condition (severe or significant nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, etc.) 6. Patients with serious bleeding tendencies (disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), internal hemorrhage, etc.). 7. Ascites or pleural fluid requiring active medical management including paracentesis, or hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of \< 130 mEq/L). 8. Patients with known allergy to polyethylene glycol or gelatin capsules. 9. Patients with an addiction to a legal or illegal drug, or with alcohol dependency. 10. Patients who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant, or lactating mothers. 11. Patients who have not consented to the following contraceptive measures. Patients will avoid sexual intercourse with sexual partners or should use the following contraceptive methods in these time periods: for male patients during the administration period of the trial and for six months after the end of administration; female patients during the administration period of the trial and until a second menstrual period is confirmed after the end of administration (or in the case of female patients with no menstrual period, for two months after the end of administration). 1) Male patients: Patients will always use a condom. For effective contraception, it is recommended that the female partner also use the contraceptive methods for female patients. 2) Female patients: Female patients who may become pregnant should use one or more types of the following contraceptive methods. In addition, the male partner will always use a condom. * Oral contraceptive (birth control pills) * Intrauterine device (IUD) * Tubal ligation 12. Other patients judged to be unsuitable by an investigator or sub-investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse EventsUp to 3 yearsTotal number affected by any adverse events (details are presented in adverse event section)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Efficacy in Hematologic Remission (IWG2006 Criteria)Up to 3 yearsSD (stable disease): according to International Working Group 2006 response criteria for myelodysplastic syndrome, SD was defined as a failure to achieve complete remission or partial remission, but no evidence of progression for \> 8 weeks.
Total Efficacy in Hematologic Improvement Ratio According to IWG 2006 Criteria.Up to 3 yearsNCA (not considered assessable): no evidence of HI-E (hematologic improvement-erythroid), HI-P (hematologic improvement-platelet), HI-N (hematologic improvement-neutorophil), progressive disease, or relapse.
Cytogenetic Response Ratio According to IWG 2006 CriteriaUp to 3 yearsNCA (not considered assessable): no cytogenetic response
Overall SurvivalUp to 3 yearsSurvived
Changes in Clinical Laboratory Test ResultsUp to 3 yearsClinically significant changes

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SyB C-1101
SyB C-1101 (rigosertib sodium): Following Cycle 6 of Study 2012002, the treatment in this study was initiated. One cycle was defined as a 21-day cycle; 14-day oral administration of SyB C-1101 twice daily (Days 1 to 14) followed by a 1-week observation period (Days 15 to 21). The starting dose of SyB C-1101 in this study (Cycle 7) was the same as that was determined for the next cycle in Cycle 6 of Study 2012002.
1
Total1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSyB C-1101
Age, Customized
50-59 years
1 participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years
0 participants
Age, Customized
70-79 years
0 participants
Age, Customized
80-years
0 participants
Gender
Female
0 Participants
Gender
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Adverse Events

Total number affected by any adverse events (details are presented in adverse event section)

Time frame: Up to 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SyB C-1101Adverse Events1 participants
Secondary

Changes in Clinical Laboratory Test Results

Clinically significant changes

Time frame: Up to 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SyB C-1101Changes in Clinical Laboratory Test Results0 participants
Secondary

Cytogenetic Response Ratio According to IWG 2006 Criteria

NCA (not considered assessable): no cytogenetic response

Time frame: Up to 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SyB C-1101Cytogenetic Response Ratio According to IWG 2006 Criteria1 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Survived

Time frame: Up to 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SyB C-1101Overall Survival1 participants
Secondary

Total Efficacy in Hematologic Improvement Ratio According to IWG 2006 Criteria.

NCA (not considered assessable): no evidence of HI-E (hematologic improvement-erythroid), HI-P (hematologic improvement-platelet), HI-N (hematologic improvement-neutorophil), progressive disease, or relapse.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SyB C-1101Total Efficacy in Hematologic Improvement Ratio According to IWG 2006 Criteria.1 participants
Secondary

Total Efficacy in Hematologic Remission (IWG2006 Criteria)

SD (stable disease): according to International Working Group 2006 response criteria for myelodysplastic syndrome, SD was defined as a failure to achieve complete remission or partial remission, but no evidence of progression for \> 8 weeks.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SyB C-1101Total Efficacy in Hematologic Remission (IWG2006 Criteria)1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026