Skip to content

Patient-Specific Versus Conventional Instrumentation in TKA

RCT Multicenter Comparison of Patient-Specific Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Primary TKA

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02002624
Acronym
Visio
Enrollment
140
Registered
2013-12-06
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2013-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to compare the clinical and radiologic results of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation.

Interventions

Sponsors

Cochin Hospital
Lead SponsorAMBIG

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the knee requiring total knee arthroplasty * aged between 18 and 85 years * able to understand information * affiliated to social security.

Exclusion criteria

* active or suspected sepsis * tumor around the knee * previous partial or total knee replacement * presence of hardware that could artifact MRI * contraindication to MRI * extra-articular deformation requiring osteotomy around the knee in conjunction with TKA * social situation that could impair follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanical axis3 monthsLower limb mechanical axis was measured on a bipodal standing leg-length anteroposterior radiograph with the patella oriented straight made three months postoperatively, using Roman software version 1.70 (Oswestry, United Kingdom). Postoperative lower limb mechanical axis was calculated from the HKA (hip-knee-ankle) angle between the femoral and tibial mechanical axes, respectively. An HKA angle greater than 180° was indicative of valgus, whereas values lower than 180° indicated varus.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Components position3 monthsAlso, components position in the coronal plane was measured on both the tibial and femoral sides by the femoral (F) angle between the tangent line of the distal prosthetic condyles and the mechanical axis of the femur, and by the tibial (T) angle between the tangent line of the prosthetic tibial baseplate and the mechanical axis of the tibia. In addition in the sagittal plane, tibial slope (TS) was measured by the angle between the tangent of the tibial baseplate and the posterior cortex of the tibia on a lateral view of the knee made at three-month follow-up.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood loss5 daysAccording to Mercuriali et al.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026