Skip to content

Dental Implants and Mouth Rinse

Comparison of the Effect of the Preoperative Use of Chlorhexidine, Essential Oil, and Cetylpyridinium Chloride Mouthwashes on Bacterial Contamination During Dental Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02002442
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-12-05
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2018-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Reduction in Bacterial Counts Through the Use of Mouthwash

Keywords

Mouthwash, Chlorhexidine, cetylpyridinium chloride, Saline, Implants, Saliva Collection

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a 60 second rinse with chlorhexidine, essential oil-based mouthwash, cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwash, or saline solution on bacterial contamination in the buccal vestibule when used preoperatively using the real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR). We hypothesize that preoperative rinse with chlorhexidine mouthwash will result in greater reduction of bacterial counts than with essential oil-based, cetylpyridinium chloride, or saline mouthwashes. The secondary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the tested mouthwashes in reducing the bacterial counts over time. We hypothesize that preoperative rinse with chlorhexidine mouthwash will result in a reduction of bacterial counts for longer duration than with essential oil-based, cetylpyridinium chloride, or saline mouthwashes.

Interventions

An investigator will give the patient the assigned mouthwash based on the randomized group allocation. 30ml of the mouthwash will be given to the subject in a sterilized calibrated tube. The subject will be asked to rinse for 60 seconds. Then, the patient will spit the mouthwash.

Sponsors

Tufts University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient who is treatment planned for dental implant placement and qualifies for dental implant placement according to the standards of care in the Department of Periodontology at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine. * Aged 18 years and above. * Partially edentulous.

Exclusion criteria

* Antibiotic therapy within 2 weeks of the study. * Active infection in the oral cavity. * Known allergy to any of the agents used in the study. * Self-reported pregnancy (as the surgical procedure of dental implant placement is elective and typically deferred until after the delivery). * Fully edentulous. * Patient with severe periodontitis (Clinical attachment loss of 5mm or more in the majority of intraoral sites). * Regular use of mouthwashes (once/day).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oral Rinse Comparison60 seconds rinseThe primary aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a 60 second rinse with chlorhexidine, essential oil-based mouthwash, cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwash, or saline solution on bacterial contamination in the buccal vestibule when used preoperatively using the real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bacterial Count Reduction60 seconds rinseThe secondary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the tested mouthwashes in reducing the bacterial counts over time.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026