Does Laryngoscopic Tecnique Facilitate cLMA Insertion?

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02000791

Acronym

cLMA

Enrollment

180

Registered

2013-12-04

Start date

2013-12-31

Completion date

2014-05-31

Last updated

2013-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urologic Surgery

Keywords

cLMA, laryngoscopy, fiberoptic

Brief summary

it is compared that laryngeal mask insertion with standard technique and laryngoscopic technique

Detailed description

Is there any releation between insertion succes rate and difficult intubation criteria. success of the first attempt laryngeal mask insertion, patient response of laryngeal mask placement. And also during the implementation of these two techniques; the effects on heart rate and blood pressure and postoperative complications were investigated.

Interventions

OTHERComparison of fibreoptic view

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Masking

SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Over 18 age * under urologic surgery patient

Exclusion criteria

* Uper respiratory infection * Full stomach * BMI over 40

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
İnvestigate to easy of insertion whether standart or laryngoscopic technique	1 min after insertion

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Fiberoptic view	1 min after insertion

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactTuğba Arslan, MD

tuba.kokulu@gmail.com+905074378919

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026