Skip to content

Comparison of the Quality of CPR by Lay Rescuers With and Without Feedback Devices

Comparison of the Quality of CPR by Lay Rescuers With and Without Telephone Instructions by a Simulated Rescue Coordination Center

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02000505
Acronym
frequenz
Enrollment
240
Registered
2013-12-04
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2015-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Brief summary

Comparison of various methods to improve the quality of CPR

Detailed description

Even for paramedics and emergency physicians, the resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest remains a challenge. Previous studies have shown that the cardiac output varies widely even among professional helpers. This is especially due to some very different mean frequencies of cardiac compression wich vary from 60 to 160/min for paramedics. Aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of feedback-devices during cardiac-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can lead to an improvement of the cardiac output and may improve survival. For this, we examine the impact of different feedback-methods on the frequence-variety on manikin by lay rescuers. Overall, we compare three different devices for feedback during CPR. The subjects for this study are lay rescuers who perform a 5 minute chest-compression-only CPR.

Interventions

DEVICEPocketCPR

5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, using Zoll PocketCPR

DEVICEMetronome

5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, using a metronome

DEVICE110bpm Song

5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, using a song with 110bpm for support

Sponsors

University Hospital of Cologne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* lay rescuers * \>18 years * \<60 years

Exclusion criteria

* professional rescuers * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The average achieved cardiac outputafter 5 minutesThe main goal of the study is the average achieved cardiac output. Data acquisition is carried out on a resuscitation-manikin which can measure compression-rate (CR) and compression-depth (CD). The data are recorded by a computer during the CPR. To calculate the cardiac output, we multiply the average CR \[1/min\] with the average CD \[mm\] during the 5 min manikin-resuscitation. The thus obtained average cardiac-output (CO = CR x CD), measured in \[mm/min\], will be compared in each group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Constancy of the quality of chest-compressionsafter 5 minutesSecond objective of the study is the variation of the compression-rate and the compression-depth during the resuscitation. We compare the average compression-rate and compression-depth of the first 30 compressions and the last 30 compression of every participant. As a result, the average standard deviation in each group will be calculated. Afterward, the groups will be compared using the mean deviation of every group. The mean deviation will be measured in +/-\[mm\] for compression-depth and +/-\[1/min\] for compression rate.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactStefan Braunecker, MD
stefan.braunecker@uk-koeln.de

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026