Skip to content

The Role of Estrogen in Luteinizing Hormone Surge and Ovulation

The Role of Estrogen in Luteinizing Hormone Surge and Ovulation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01999569
Enrollment
10
Registered
2013-12-03
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2022-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Cysts, Ovulation Disorder

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to establish that sustained estrogen levels are the driving force for the LH surge, and are thereby necessary for ovulation to occur. We predict that by reducing levels of circulating estrogen, letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, will inhibit ovulation from occurring.

Detailed description

Sine the common understanding of ovulation in a natural cycle suggests that a sustained, elevated estradiol level is required to trigger the LH surge, administration of letrozole throughout the cycle should lower estradiol levels and prevent the LH surge from occurring. In this study, we sought to determine if the LH surge, ovulation and luteinization occurs in spite of low estradiol levels by daily administration of letrozole in a group of normal ovulatory volunteers in a prospective study. After IRB approval and informed consent were obtained, ten willing volunteers that met inclusion criteria (no hormonal contraception within 3 months, regular menstrual cycles 26 - 30 days, normal thyroid function and normal prolactin, and no pregnancy currently or within 3 months) were monitored for one month without treatment for evaluation of normal ovulation. Natural control cycle The subjects used home urine LH tests (Clearblue® Easy, SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics, Switzerland) on days 10-18 to monitor for the LH surge in both the initial natural cycle and the letrozole cycle. Blood was drawn every other day starting on day 12 of the cycle through day 22 to measure estradiol and progesterone levels, and follicular development was monitored using transvaginal ultrasound on cycle day 12-14. Letrozole cycle In the next cycle, all ten subjects were administered oral letrozole 5 mg daily (Femara®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ ) starting on cycle day 1-3 and continuing through the completion of the study (cycle day 22). Once again, serum estradiol and progesterone levels were measured every other day on days 12-22. The development of the ovarian follicles was monitored by transvaginal ultrasound once in each cycle between days 12-14, and LH surge was monitored with home urine ovulation tests on days 10-18. Table 1 illustrates protocols for both the natural control cycle and the letrozole study cycle. The primary outcome, assessment of ovulation in letrozole cycles, was determined by the presence or absence of progesterone elevation (\>1.5 ng/mL) and the presence or absence of a positive urinary LH test. The bioequivalence evaluation of two cycles (before and after letrozole administration) was based on pharmacokinetic parameters such as area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC), the peak serum concentration (Cmax) and the time of peak serum concentration (Tmax). Cmax and Tmax were determined by visual inspection from each volunteer's serum concentration-time curve for estradiol and progesterone. AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal method from day 12 through day 22 in both the initial natural cycle and the letrozole cycle. Paired t-tests, or Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests if non-normally distributed, were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters. The McNemar test was used to assess the difference in LH surge and follicular development before and after letrozole administration. A standard of statistical significance (alpha) of 0.05 was used in all cases. The SAS System (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.

Interventions

DRUGLetrozole

Letrozole administered daily through the time of ovulation.

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient having regular menstrual cycles between 26-30 days * Ages 18-40 * Patient must not be sexually active during the study period, or if so must be using a reliable form of non-hormonal birth control including tubal ligation or vasectomy, non-hormonal intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD), or condoms with spermicide. * Willing to participate in study and available for all monitoring visits. * IRB consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patient must NOT have used hormonal contraception three months or less prior to study. * Irregular menstrual cycles (\<26 days or \>30 days within the last 6 months. * Untreated thyroid dysfunction or hyperprolactinemia * Pregnancy (current or within 3 months) or breastfeeding * Allergy or contraindication to letrozole

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Progesterone Level Greater Than 1.5 ng/mLCycle days 12-22Serum progesterone ng/mL drawn during cycle days twelve through 22

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Positive LH TestCycle days 10-18Urine ovulation tests assessed
Number of Participants With Follicular DevelopmentCycle day 12Ovulation; elevated progesterone

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Ovulatory volunteers

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Control cycle. Then letrozole cycle
10
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Progesterone Level Greater Than 1.5 ng/mL

Serum progesterone ng/mL drawn during cycle days twelve through 22

Time frame: Cycle days 12-22

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlNumber of Participants With Progesterone Level Greater Than 1.5 ng/mL9 Participants
Letrozole Treatment CycleNumber of Participants With Progesterone Level Greater Than 1.5 ng/mL10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Positive LH Test

Urine ovulation tests assessed

Time frame: Cycle days 10-18

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlNumber of Participants With a Positive LH Test9 Participants
Letrozole Treatment CycleNumber of Participants With a Positive LH Test10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Follicular Development

Ovulation; elevated progesterone

Time frame: Cycle day 12

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlNumber of Participants With Follicular Development10 Participants
Letrozole Treatment CycleNumber of Participants With Follicular Development10 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026