Skip to content

CLL11: A Study of Rituximab With Chlorambucil or Chlorambucil Alone in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (Stage 1b)

An Open-label, Multi-center, Three Arm Randomized Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy on Progression-free Survival of RO5072759 + Chlorambucil (GClb) Compared to Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) or Chlorambucil (Clb) Alone in Previously Untreated CLL Patients With Comorbidities

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01998880
Enrollment
787
Registered
2013-12-02
Start date
2009-12-22
Completion date
2017-08-23
Last updated
2018-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic

Brief summary

This open-label, randomized, 3-arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab (RO5072759) in combination with chlorambucil as compared to rituximab plus chlorambucil or chlorambucil alone in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients will be randomized 2:2:1 to receive a maximum of six 28-day cycles of either RO5072759 (1000mg iv infusion, on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-6) plus chlorambucil (0.5 mg/kg orally, days 1 and 15 of cycles 1-6), or rituximab (iv infusion day 1, 375 mg/m\^2 cycle 1, 500 mg/m\^2 cycles 2-6) plus chlorambucil, or chlorambucil alone. Anticipated time on study treatment is \>6 months and follow-up for disease-progression and safety will be at least 5 years. In the US, this trial is sponsored/managed by Genentech.

Detailed description

Protocol BO21004 is divided into 3 separate Unique Protocol IDs for reporting results on clinicaltrials.gov because there are 3 separate primary analyses conducted at different time-points. * BO21004 (Stage 1a) \[NCT01010061\] includes the analysis of 2 of the 3 arms obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Glb) compared to chlorambucil (Clb) reported separately. * BO21004 (Stage 1b) \[NCT01998880\] includes the analysis of 2 of the 3 arms rituximab plus chlorambucil (RClb) compared to chlorambucil (Clb) reported here. * BO21004 (Stage 2) \[NCT02053610\] includes the analysis of 2 of the 3 arms obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Glb) compared to rituximab plus chlorambucil (RClb) reported separately.

Interventions

DRUGobinutuzumab

1000 mg obinutuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion, on Days 1 \[first infusion split 100 mg on Day 1 and 900 mg on Day 2 as per protocol amendment\], 8 and 15 in Cycle 1 and Day 1 in Cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles).

DRUGrituximab

375 mg/m\^2 rituximab intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle duration is 28 days) then 500 mg/m\^2 IV infusions on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6.

DRUGchlorambucil

Chlorambucil 0.5 mg/kg orally on Day 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle.

Sponsors

German CLL Study Group
CollaboratorOTHER
Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults \>/=18 years * Documented Cluster of Differentiation Antigen 20 (CD20) + B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Lymphoma (B-CLL) * Previously untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) requiring treatment according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) criteria * Total Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) \> 6 and/or creatinine clearance \< 70 ml/min

Exclusion criteria

* Prior CLL therapy * Transformation of CLL to aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Richter's transformation) * History of other malignancy unless the malignancy has been in remission without treatment for \>/=2 years prior to enrolment, and except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer, surgically treated low-grade prostate cancer, or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast treated with lymphectomy alone * Positive hepatitis serology (HBV, HCV) or positive HIV or Human T Cell Leukemia Virus (HTLV) testing * Patients with active infection requiring systemic treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by the investigator. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival EventsRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)EOTR was the first response assessment 56 days from the last dose according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (IWCLL) guidelines. CR required: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. PR required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.
Percentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of TreatmentRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)Molecular remission was defined as a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative result at the end of treatment (assessment that occurred between 56 days and 6 months of last treatment). Molecular remission was assessed for all patients using a blood sample. Additionally, a bone marrow sample was obtained from patients whom the investigator assumed to have a complete response, consistent with the IWCLL guidelines. A combined analysis of blood and bone marrow results was conducted. A patient was considered MRD negative if result was less than 1 CLL cell in 10000 leukocytes (MRD value \< 0.0001) based on the method of allele specific polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR).
Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataRandomization to clinical cutoff date of 9 May 2013 (median observation 22.7 months)PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataRandomization to clinical cutoff date of 9 May 2013 (median observation 22.7 months)Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by an Independent Review Committee.
Event Free SurvivalRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time between date of randomization and the date of disease progression/relapse, death, or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).
Duration of ResponseRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)Duration of Response was defined as the date the response \[either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)\] was first recorded until the date of Disease Progression or death due to any cause. Response was assessed according IWCLL guidelines.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreBaseline and Cycle 4 Day 1 (Cy4D1)The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 was used to assess patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and symptom burden. The QLQ-C30 contains 30 items including the functional scales of physical functioning (5 items), role functioning (2 items), emotional functioning (4 items), cognitive functioning (2 items), social functioning (2 items) and symptom scales including fatigue (3 items), nausea and vomiting (2 items), and pain (4 items) and six single item scales on dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be of minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreBaseline and Cycle 4 Day 1 (Cy4D1)EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CLL16) module was used to assess patient-reported outcomes and symptom burden. The QLQ-CLL16 module includes three multi-item scales assessing fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects and disease symptoms (8 items), infection (4 items) and two single item scales on social activities and future health worries. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be of minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)Best overall response according to IWCLL guidelines was defined as the percentage of patients with CR, CRi,PR or nPR. CR required all of the following: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. PR required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.
Time to Re-Treatment/New-antileukemic TherapyRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)Time to re-treatment/new anti-leukemic therapy was defined as time between the date of randomization and the date of first intake of re-treatment or new anti-leukemic therapy.
Overall SurvivalRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

787 patients were enrolled in the study. Following a 6 patient safety run-in prior to randomization, 781 patients were randomized.

Pre-assignment details

589 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups in 2:2:1 ratio: GClb (n=238), RClb (n=233) or Clb (n=118) in Stage 1 plus 192 randomized to GClb or RClb in Stage 2 \[NCT02053610\]. Stage 1 was divided for analysis into: Stage 1a \[NCT01010061\] (GClb vs Clb) reported separately and Stage 1b \[NCT01998880\] (RClb vs Clb) (n=351) reported here.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)
Participants received 375 mg/m\^2 rituximab IV infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 then 500 mg/m\^2 IV infusions on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles) plus chlorambucil 0.5 mg/kg orally on Day 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (6 cycles).
233
Chlorambucil (Clb)
Participants received chlorambucil 0.5 mg/kg orally on Day 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (6 Cycles). Participants with Progressive Disease or within 6 months of follow-up were allowed to cross over to receive obinutuzumab + chlorambucil.
118
Total351

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative/Other11
Overall StudyAdverse Events or Intercurrent Illness1616
Overall StudyDeath36
Overall StudyDid Not Receive Treatment32
Overall StudyDisease Progression18
Overall StudyInsufficient Therapeutic Response15
Overall StudyRefused Treatment/Did Not Cooperate10
Overall StudyViolation of Selection Criteria at Entry01
Overall StudyWithdrew Consent21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Chlorambucil (Clb)Total
Age, Customized
<65 years
47 participants26 participants73 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
186 participants92 participants278 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants43 Participants127 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
149 Participants75 Participants224 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
202 / 22589 / 116
serious
Total, serious adverse events
87 / 22545 / 116

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events

Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death.

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events90.1 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events90.7 Percentage of participants
Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by the investigator. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants. Patients without PFS events were censored.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Progression-free Survival (PFS)16.5 Months
Chlorambucil (Clb)Progression-free Survival (PFS)11.1 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.36, 0.59]Log Rank, Stratified
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of Response was defined as the date the response \[either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)\] was first recorded until the date of Disease Progression or death due to any cause. Response was assessed according IWCLL guidelines.

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants) with CR or PR. Participants without response were censored.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Duration of Response12.2 Months
Chlorambucil (Clb)Duration of Response5.1 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.31, 0.65]Log Rank, Stratified
Secondary

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire Score

The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 was used to assess patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and symptom burden. The QLQ-C30 contains 30 items including the functional scales of physical functioning (5 items), role functioning (2 items), emotional functioning (4 items), cognitive functioning (2 items), social functioning (2 items) and symptom scales including fatigue (3 items), nausea and vomiting (2 items), and pain (4 items) and six single item scales on dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be of minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Cycle 4 Day 1 (Cy4D1)

Population: ITT population. Here, n signifies the number of participants who were evaluated for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreFinancial Difficulty Scale: Cy4D1(n=193,93)10.2 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.26
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreDyspnoea Scale: Baseline (n=220, 109)26.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.09
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreNausea, Vomiting Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)4.4 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.04
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreAppetite Loss Scale: Cy4D1 (n=196, 92)10.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreNausea, Vomiting Scale: Cy4D1 (n=197,93)3.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.99
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreDyspnoea: Cy4D1 (n=196, 91)19.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.19
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScorePain scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)21.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.37
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreConstipation Scale: Cy4D1 (n=195, 93)13.3 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.04
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScorePain scale: Cy4D1 (n=197, 93)15.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.41
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreEmotional Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)77.3 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.23
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScorePhysical Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)76.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.95
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreCognitive Functioning Scale: Cy4D1 (n=190,93)83.0 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.86
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScorePhysical Functioning Scale: Cy4D1(n=197,93)77.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.27
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreEmotional Functioning Scale:Change Cy4D1(n=196,93)82.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.52
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreGlobal Health Status Scale: Baseline (n=219, 111)58.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.28
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreDiarrhoea Scale: Baseline (n=220, 110)7.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.66
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreGlobal Health Status Scale: Cy4D1(n=195,93)65.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.13
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreFatigue Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)35.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreRole Functioning Scale: Baseline(n=221,110)76.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.7
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreCognitive Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)82.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.77
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreRole Functioning Scale: Cy4D1(n=197,93)79.4 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.97
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreFatigue Scale: Cy4D1(n=197, 93)29.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.24
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreSocial Functioning Scale:Baseline(n=221,110)82.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.49
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreDiarrhoea Scale: Cy4D1 (n=195, 93)9.2 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.45
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreSocial Functioning Scale: Cy4D1(n=195,93)85.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.79
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreFinancial Difficulties Scale: Baseline (n=220,110)10.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.12
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreInsomnia Scale: Baseline (n=220,111)24.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.03
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreConstipation Scale: Baseline (n=219, 111)15.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.37
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreInsomnia Scale: Cy4D1(n=195,93)18.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.77
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreAppetite Loss Scale: Baseline (n=220, 111)15.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.11
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreInsomnia Scale: Cy4D1(n=195,93)24.4 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.13
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreAppetite Loss Scale: Baseline (n=220, 111)19.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.26
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreAppetite Loss Scale: Cy4D1 (n=196, 92)14.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.36
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreCognitive Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)81.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.76
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreCognitive Functioning Scale: Cy4D1 (n=190,93)85.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.54
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreConstipation Scale: Baseline (n=219, 111)16.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.92
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreConstipation Scale: Cy4D1 (n=195, 93)12.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.53
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreDiarrhoea Scale: Baseline (n=220, 110)8.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.98
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreDiarrhoea Scale: Cy4D1 (n=195, 93)6.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.95
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreDyspnoea Scale: Baseline (n=220, 109)23.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.63
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreDyspnoea: Cy4D1 (n=196, 91)22.3 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.78
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreEmotional Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)72.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreEmotional Functioning Scale:Change Cy4D1(n=196,93)80.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.48
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreFatigue Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)36.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.01
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreFatigue Scale: Cy4D1(n=197, 93)30.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreFinancial Difficulties Scale: Baseline (n=220,110)13.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.26
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreFinancial Difficulty Scale: Cy4D1(n=193,93)9.3 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.88
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreNausea, Vomiting Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)7.4 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.49
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreNausea, Vomiting Scale: Cy4D1 (n=197,93)7.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.81
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScorePain scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)21.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.66
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScorePain scale: Cy4D1 (n=197, 93)17.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.98
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScorePhysical Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=221, 111)77.3 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.87
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScorePhysical Functioning Scale: Cy4D1(n=197,93)80.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.24
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreGlobal Health Status Scale: Baseline (n=219, 111)57.4 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreGlobal Health Status Scale: Cy4D1(n=195,93)63.4 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.56
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreRole Functioning Scale: Baseline(n=221,110)74.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.35
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreRole Functioning Scale: Cy4D1(n=197,93)81.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.35
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreSocial Functioning Scale:Baseline(n=221,110)83.3 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.34
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreSocial Functioning Scale: Cy4D1(n=195,93)85.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.38
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire ScoreInsomnia Scale: Baseline (n=220,111)31.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.98
Secondary

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire Score

EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CLL16) module was used to assess patient-reported outcomes and symptom burden. The QLQ-CLL16 module includes three multi-item scales assessing fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects and disease symptoms (8 items), infection (4 items) and two single item scales on social activities and future health worries. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be of minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Cycle 4 Day 1 (Cy4D1)

Population: ITT population. Here, n signifies the number of participants who were evaluated for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreDisease Effects Scale: Baseline (n=198, 102)22.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.21
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreDisease Effects Scale: Cy4D1 (n=173, 86)14.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.71
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreFatigue Scale: Baseline (n=198, 102)27.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.39
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreFatigue Scale: Cy4D1 (n=173, 86)20.0 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.25
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreFuture Health: Baseline (n=197, 101)45.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.24
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreFuture Health: Cy4D1 (n=171, 86)33.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.12
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreInfection Scale: Baseline (n=197, 102)9.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.45
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreInfection Scale: Cy4D1 (n=173, 86)8.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.08
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreSocial Problems: Baseline (n=195, 100)25.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.4
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreSocial Problems: Cy4D1 (n=173, 85)19.3 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.94
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreTreatment Side Effects Scale: Baseline (n=198,102)17.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.98
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreTreatment Side Effect Scale: Cy4D1(n=172,86)13.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.42
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreTreatment Side Effects Scale: Baseline (n=198,102)17.2 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.27
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreDisease Effects Scale: Baseline (n=198, 102)23.7 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.18
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreInfection Scale: Baseline (n=197, 102)14.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.97
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreDisease Effects Scale: Cy4D1 (n=173, 86)15.9 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.16
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreSocial Problems: Cy4D1 (n=173, 85)22.0 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreFatigue Scale: Baseline (n=198, 102)27.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.65
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreInfection Scale: Cy4D1 (n=173, 86)8.5 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreFatigue Scale: Cy4D1 (n=173, 86)23.4 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreTreatment Side Effect Scale: Cy4D1(n=172,86)15.6 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.11
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreFuture Health: Baseline (n=197, 101)50.8 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.53
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreSocial Problems: Baseline (n=195, 100)26.3 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.26
Chlorambucil (Clb)European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire ScoreFuture Health: Cy4D1 (n=171, 86)39.1 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.33
Secondary

Event Free Survival

Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time between date of randomization and the date of disease progression/relapse, death, or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants. Patients without EFS events were censored.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Event Free Survival15.7 Months
Chlorambucil (Clb)Event Free Survival10.8 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.31, 0.5]Log Rank, Stratified
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants. Patients without OS events were censored.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Overall Survival74.9 Months
Chlorambucil (Clb)Overall Survival66.7 Months
p-value: 0.284195% CI: [0.61, 1.16]Log Rank, Stratified
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response

Best overall response according to IWCLL guidelines was defined as the percentage of patients with CR, CRi,PR or nPR. CR required all of the following: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. PR required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants) with data available for analysis. Participants who did not reach the 3 month Follow-up visit at the time of the clinical cutoff are excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponsePartial Response (PR)54.9 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseStable Disease13.3 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseComplete Response Incomplete (CRi)1.7 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseProgressive Disease12.4 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseNodular Partial Response (nPR)1.7 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseNo Response Assessment8.2 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseComplete Response (CR)7.7 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseNo Response Assessment16.9 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseComplete Response (CR)0.0 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseComplete Response Incomplete (CRi)1.7 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponsePartial Response (PR)31.4 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseNodular Partial Response (nPR)0.0 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseStable Disease21.2 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseProgressive Disease28.8 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Includes subjects with best overall response: CR, CRi, PR or nPR.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [22.1, 43.9]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)

EOTR was the first response assessment 56 days from the last dose according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (IWCLL) guidelines. CR required: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. PR required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants) with data available for analysis. Participants who did not reach the 3 month Follow-up visit at the time of the clinical cutoff are excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Partial Response (PR)55.4 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Stable Disease13.7 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Complete Response incomplete (CRi)2.1 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Progressive Disease12.4 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Nodular Partial Response (nPR)3.4 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)No Response Assessment8.2 Percentage of participants
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Complete Response (CR)4.7 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)No Response Assessment16.9 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Complete Response (CR)0.0 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Complete Response incomplete (CRi)0.0 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Partial Response (PR)28.8 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Nodular Partial Response (nPR)2.5 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Stable Disease22.9 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Progressive Disease28.8 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [23.5, 45.1]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of Treatment

Molecular remission was defined as a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative result at the end of treatment (assessment that occurred between 56 days and 6 months of last treatment). Molecular remission was assessed for all patients using a blood sample. Additionally, a bone marrow sample was obtained from patients whom the investigator assumed to have a complete response, consistent with the IWCLL guidelines. A combined analysis of blood and bone marrow results was conducted. A patient was considered MRD negative if result was less than 1 CLL cell in 10000 leukocytes (MRD value \< 0.0001) based on the method of allele specific polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR).

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants) with MRD data available for analysis. Participants who did not reach the 3 month Follow-up visit at the time of the clinical cutoff are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of Treatment2 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of Treatment0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data

Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by an Independent Review Committee.

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff date of 9 May 2013 (median observation 22.7 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants. Participants without PFS events were censored.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data64.8 Percentage of participants
Chlorambucil (Clb)Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data76.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff date of 9 May 2013 (median observation 22.7 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants. Patients without PFS events were censored.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data16.1 months
Chlorambucil (Clb)Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data11.2 months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.35, 0.61]Log-ranked, Stratified
Secondary

Time to Re-Treatment/New-antileukemic Therapy

Time to re-treatment/new anti-leukemic therapy was defined as time between the date of randomization and the date of first intake of re-treatment or new anti-leukemic therapy.

Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 57.7 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants. Participants without events (re-treatment or new anti-leukemic therapy) were censored.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Time to Re-Treatment/New-antileukemic Therapy33.2 months
Chlorambucil (Clb)Time to Re-Treatment/New-antileukemic Therapy15.1 months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.3, 0.53]Log Rank, Stratified

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026