Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
Conditions
Keywords
Lymphoma, Mantle cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, Marginal zone Lymphoma, Lenalidomide treatment, rituximab treatment, Non Hodgkins Lymphoma
Brief summary
Follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are distinct histologic types of B-cell NHL. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct and immune-mediated mechanisms of action, as well as clinical activity in NHL. Recent studies in frontline and relapsed/refractory NHL show high activity for lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2), supporting further study of this combination.
Detailed description
MAGNIFY (NCT01996865) is a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label study of patients with grades 1-3b or transformed follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who received ≥1 prior therapy and had stage I-IV, measurable disease. \ 500 patients are planned for enrollment in 12 cycles of R2 induction, with a projected \ 314 patients with ≥SD after induction randomized (1:1) to two maintenance arms. Induction includes oral lenalidomide 20 mg/day, days 1-21 per 28-day cycle (d1-21/28) plus IV rituximab 375 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 (28-day cycles). Patients are then randomized to maintenance lenalidomide 10 mg/day, d1-21/28, cycles 13-30, plus rituximab 375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, and 29 (R2, Arm A), or rituximab alone (same schedule, Arm B). Patients receiving R2 maintenance after 18 cycles may continue maintenance lenalidomide monotherapy 10 mg/day, d1-21/28 (per patient and/or investigator discretion), until disease progression as tolerated. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (per modified 1999 IWG criteria). Secondary endpoints include safety, overall survival, response rates, duration of response, and quality of life (exploratory). Patients will be followed for ≥5 years after the last patient initiated induction therapy. Enrollment in MAGNIFY began in March 2014; as of Jan 2016, 133 patients are enrolled.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
\-- Age ≥18 years * Histologically confirmed Follicular Lymphoma (FL, Grade 1, 2, 3a, or 3b), Transformed FL, Marginal Zone Lymphoma, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma * Must have documented relapsed, refractory or Progressive Disease after last treatment with systemic therapy * Bi-dimensionally measurable disease * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status \< 2 * Adequate bone marrow function * Willingness to follow pregnancy precautions
Exclusion criteria
* Histology other than follicular or marginal zone lymphoma or clinical evidence of transformation or Grade 3b follicular lymphoma * Any medical condition (other than the underlying lymphoma) that requires chronic steroid use * Subjects taking corticosteroids during the last 1 week prior treatment, unless administered at a dose equivalent to \< 20 mg/day of prednisone * Systemic anti-lymphoma therapy within 28 days or use of antibody agents within 4 weeks use of radioimmunotherapy within 3 months * Known seropositive for or active viral infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Known sensitivity or allergy to murine products * Presence or history of central nervous system involvement by lymphoma. Subjects who are at a risk for a thromboembolic event and are not willing to take prophylaxis for it * Any condition that places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study Other protocol-defined inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to objective disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks) | Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of first dose of maintenance therapy to the date of the first objective documentation of tumor progression or death due to any cause. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. The PFS events were determined using a modification of the IWG 1999 criteria. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement of Response (IOR) | From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to death from any cause (up to approximately 432 weeks) | Improvement of Response (IOR) is the percentage of participants with improved tumor response during the maintenance phase (converted from partial response at end of induction to complete response or complete response unconfirmed as best response) and participants who converted from stable disease at the end of induction period to partial response or better as best response during maintenance phase. |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) | From the first dose date of maintenance therapy up to CR, CRu, PR, or treatment change (up to approximately 432 weeks) | The overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best response of at least partial response (including complete response, complete response unconfirmed and partial response) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change. |
| Complete Response Rate (CRR) | From the first dose date of maintenance therapy up to CR or CRu (up to approximately 432 weeks) | Best Complete Response Rate (CRR), defined as the proportion of participants with a best response of at least CRu (including CR and CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) | From the initial response (at least PR) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks) | DOR is from initial response (at least CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death. Participants who have not progressed or died at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression. Participants who change treatment without evidence of disease progression will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression prior to treatment change. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. |
| Time to Next Anti-lymphoma Treatment | From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of first documented administration of new anti-lymphoma therapy (up to approximately 300 weeks) | Time to next anti-lymphoma treatment is defined as the time from the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of first documented administration of new anti-lymphoma therapy. Participants without new treatment therapy will be censored at the last visit. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to death from any cause (up to approximately 480 weeks) | Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the first dose date of maintenance therapy and death from any cause. Participants who complete the study and are still alive at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last visit date or the last contact date, whichever is later. Participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the clinical data cut-off date will also be censored at the time of the last contact. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates and Hazard Ratio (HR). |
| Duration of Complete Response (DOCR) | From the initial CR/CRu after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks) | Duration of complete response (DOCR) is calculated as the time from the initial response (CR or CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. Participants who have not progressed or died at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression. Participants who change treatment without evidence of disease progression will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression prior to treatment change. |
| Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period) | Number of participants experiencing AEs, SAEs, AEs leading to study discontinuation, and AEs of interest (AEIs). An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization; results significant disability; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs are defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment in the study, or if a pre-existing condition worsens in severity or becomes serious after receiving the first dose of study treatment. |
| Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period) | The number of participants who experienced adverse events related to vital sign measurements |
| Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period) | Clinical laboratory values in induction period include any laboratory values that are taken after the first dose date of induction therapy through 28 days after the last dose date of induction therapy or before the first dose date of maintenance therapy, whichever is earlier. Graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 4.03, except for tumor flare reaction, which is accessed using NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with zero maximum grade are excluded. |
| Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period) | Clinical laboratory values in induction period include any laboratory values that are taken after the first dose date of induction therapy through 28 days after the last dose date of therapy. Graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 4.03, except for tumor flare reaction, which is accessed using NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with zero maximum grade are excluded. |
| Time to Histological Transformation | From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of histological transformation (up to approximately 432 weeks) | Time to histological transformation is defined as from the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of histological transformation as measured based on documentation of histological transformation (as assessed by the investigator). Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. In case of clinical suspicion of transformation, including rapid disease progression, unexpected changes in B symptoms or rapidly increasing LDH, a biopsy should be performed. In this clinical trial, histological transformation will be considered disease progression. This endpoint will not be calculated for participants randomized with transformed Follicular Lymphoma (tFL). |
Countries
Germany, Puerto Rico, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
503 participants joined this study. All participants started in the induction period; only those who did not progress after 12 cycles of treatment were randomized to receive treatment in the maintenance period.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Overall Study All participants who were enrolled into the study. | 503 |
| Total | 503 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction Period | Adverse Event | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period | Death | 111 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period | Lost to Follow-up | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period | Other Reasons | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period | Progressive Disease | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| Maintenance Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Maintenance Period | Death | 0 | 15 | 3 |
| Maintenance Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Maintenance Period | Other reasons | 0 | 8 | 5 |
| Maintenance Period | Progressive Disease | 0 | 6 | 23 |
| Maintenance Period | Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maintenance Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 18 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Overall Study |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 294 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 209 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 33 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 463 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 17 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 468 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 215 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 288 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 112 / 500 | 26 / 134 | 32 / 132 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 491 / 500 | 129 / 134 | 106 / 132 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 172 / 500 | 57 / 134 | 22 / 132 |
Outcome results
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of first dose of maintenance therapy to the date of the first objective documentation of tumor progression or death due to any cause. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. The PFS events were determined using a modification of the IWG 1999 criteria.
Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to objective disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)
Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 263.1 Weeks |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 229.1 Weeks |
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
Best Complete Response Rate (CRR), defined as the proportion of participants with a best response of at least CRu (including CR and CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.
Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy up to CR or CRu (up to approximately 432 weeks)
Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Complete Response Rate (CRR) | 60.7 Percentage of participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Complete Response Rate (CRR) | 58.3 Percentage of participants |
Duration of Complete Response (DOCR)
Duration of complete response (DOCR) is calculated as the time from the initial response (CR or CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. Participants who have not progressed or died at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression. Participants who change treatment without evidence of disease progression will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression prior to treatment change.
Time frame: From the initial CR/CRu after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)
Population: The analysis is only performed for participants who have achieved CR or CRu after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Duration of Complete Response (DOCR) | 298.0 Weeks |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Duration of Complete Response (DOCR) | NA Weeks |
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR is from initial response (at least CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death. Participants who have not progressed or died at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression. Participants who change treatment without evidence of disease progression will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression prior to treatment change. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates.
Time frame: From the initial response (at least PR) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)
Population: The analysis is only performed for participants who have achieved PR or better after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.~Arm B includes 3 additional participants who achieved CR/CRu/PR in the follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 268.3 Weeks |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 306.0 Weeks |
Improvement of Response (IOR)
Improvement of Response (IOR) is the percentage of participants with improved tumor response during the maintenance phase (converted from partial response at end of induction to complete response or complete response unconfirmed as best response) and participants who converted from stable disease at the end of induction period to partial response or better as best response during maintenance phase.
Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to death from any cause (up to approximately 432 weeks)
Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Improvement of Response (IOR) | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Improvement of Response (IOR) | 11.4 Percentage of participants |
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
The overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best response of at least partial response (including complete response, complete response unconfirmed and partial response) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.
Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy up to CR, CRu, PR, or treatment change (up to approximately 432 weeks)
Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | 85.2 Percentage of participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | 79.5 Percentage of participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the first dose date of maintenance therapy and death from any cause. Participants who complete the study and are still alive at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last visit date or the last contact date, whichever is later. Participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the clinical data cut-off date will also be censored at the time of the last contact. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates and Hazard Ratio (HR).
Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to death from any cause (up to approximately 480 weeks)
Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Weeks |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Weeks |
Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs
The number of participants who experienced adverse events related to vital sign measurements
Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)
Population: All treated participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypotension | 22 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypertension | 34 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypoxia | 5 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypotension | 4 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypertension | 9 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypoxia | 2 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypertension | 6 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypoxia | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs | Hypotension | 5 Participants |
Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Number of participants experiencing AEs, SAEs, AEs leading to study discontinuation, and AEs of interest (AEIs). An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization; results significant disability; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs are defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment in the study, or if a pre-existing condition worsens in severity or becomes serious after receiving the first dose of study treatment.
Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)
Population: All treated participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Participants experiencing at least one TEAE | 499 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Participants experiencing at least one serious TEAE | 172 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Participants experiencing at least one TEAE | 133 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Participants experiencing at least one serious TEAE | 57 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Participants experiencing at least one TEAE | 120 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Participants experiencing at least one serious TEAE | 22 Participants |
Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters
Clinical laboratory values in induction period include any laboratory values that are taken after the first dose date of induction therapy through 28 days after the last dose date of induction therapy or before the first dose date of maintenance therapy, whichever is earlier. Graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 4.03, except for tumor flare reaction, which is accessed using NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with zero maximum grade are excluded.
Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)
Population: All treated participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Anemia - Grade 3 | 31 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Leukopenia - Grade 3 | 101 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Thrombocytopenia - Grade 3 | 29 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Neutropenia - Grade 3 | 103 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Lymphopenia - Grade 3 | 126 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Anemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Leukopenia - Grade 4 | 17 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Thrombocytopenia - Grade 4 | 7 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Neutropenia - Grade 4 | 94 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Lymphopenia - Grade 4 | 20 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Neutropenia - Grade 4 | 25 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Anemia - Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Anemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Lymphopenia - Grade 3 | 31 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Leukopenia - Grade 3 | 19 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Lymphopenia - Grade 4 | 10 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Thrombocytopenia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Thrombocytopenia - Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Leukopenia - Grade 4 | 5 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Neutropenia - Grade 3 | 24 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Thrombocytopenia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Neutropenia - Grade 3 | 10 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Lymphopenia - Grade 3 | 21 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Anemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Neutropenia - Grade 4 | 6 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Leukopenia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Anemia - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Lymphopenia - Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Leukopenia - Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters | Thrombocytopenia - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters
Clinical laboratory values in induction period include any laboratory values that are taken after the first dose date of induction therapy through 28 days after the last dose date of therapy. Graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 4.03, except for tumor flare reaction, which is accessed using NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with zero maximum grade are excluded.
Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)
Population: All treated participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypophosphatemia - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 3 | 14 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia - Grade 3 | 30 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia - Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia - Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia - Grade 4 | 5 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperbilirubinemia - Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperbilirubinemia - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia- Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia - Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypophosphatemia - Grade 3 | 17 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia - Grade 4 | 9 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercreatininemia - Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia - Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercreatininemia - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia - Grade 3 | 40 Participants |
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia- Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia - Grade 3 | 8 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia- Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypophosphatemia - Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercreatininemia - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia - Grade 3 | 13 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperbilirubinemia - Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia- Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia - Grade 4 | 5 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia - Grade 4 | 5 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypophosphatemia - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercreatininemia - Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia - Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperbilirubinemia - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia- Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia - Grade 3 | 20 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperbilirubinemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypophosphatemia - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercreatininemia - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercreatininemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypophosphatemia - Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia - Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperbilirubinemia - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia- Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia - Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Time to Histological Transformation
Time to histological transformation is defined as from the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of histological transformation as measured based on documentation of histological transformation (as assessed by the investigator). Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. In case of clinical suspicion of transformation, including rapid disease progression, unexpected changes in B symptoms or rapidly increasing LDH, a biopsy should be performed. In this clinical trial, histological transformation will be considered disease progression. This endpoint will not be calculated for participants randomized with transformed Follicular Lymphoma (tFL).
Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of histological transformation (up to approximately 432 weeks)
Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B without transformed Follicular Lymphoma (tFL)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Time to Histological Transformation | NA Weeks |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Time to Histological Transformation | NA Weeks |
Time to Next Anti-lymphoma Treatment
Time to next anti-lymphoma treatment is defined as the time from the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of first documented administration of new anti-lymphoma therapy. Participants without new treatment therapy will be censored at the last visit. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates.
Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of first documented administration of new anti-lymphoma therapy (up to approximately 300 weeks)
Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | Time to Next Anti-lymphoma Treatment | NA Weeks |
| Arm B: Rituximab | Time to Next Anti-lymphoma Treatment | NA Weeks |