Skip to content

Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab Followed by Lenalidomide Versus Rituximab Maintenance for Relapsed/Refractory Follicular, Marginal Zone or Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

A Phase 3B Randomized Study of Lenalidomide (CC-5013) Plus Rituximab Maintenance Therapy Followed by Lenalidomide Single-Agent Maintenance Versus Rituximab Maintenance in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular, Marginal Zone, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01996865
Acronym
MAGNIFY
Enrollment
503
Registered
2013-11-27
Start date
2014-04-01
Completion date
2024-09-17
Last updated
2025-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Keywords

Lymphoma, Mantle cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, Marginal zone Lymphoma, Lenalidomide treatment, rituximab treatment, Non Hodgkins Lymphoma

Brief summary

Follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are distinct histologic types of B-cell NHL. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct and immune-mediated mechanisms of action, as well as clinical activity in NHL. Recent studies in frontline and relapsed/refractory NHL show high activity for lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2), supporting further study of this combination.

Detailed description

MAGNIFY (NCT01996865) is a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label study of patients with grades 1-3b or transformed follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who received ≥1 prior therapy and had stage I-IV, measurable disease. \ 500 patients are planned for enrollment in 12 cycles of R2 induction, with a projected \ 314 patients with ≥SD after induction randomized (1:1) to two maintenance arms. Induction includes oral lenalidomide 20 mg/day, days 1-21 per 28-day cycle (d1-21/28) plus IV rituximab 375 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 (28-day cycles). Patients are then randomized to maintenance lenalidomide 10 mg/day, d1-21/28, cycles 13-30, plus rituximab 375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, and 29 (R2, Arm A), or rituximab alone (same schedule, Arm B). Patients receiving R2 maintenance after 18 cycles may continue maintenance lenalidomide monotherapy 10 mg/day, d1-21/28 (per patient and/or investigator discretion), until disease progression as tolerated. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (per modified 1999 IWG criteria). Secondary endpoints include safety, overall survival, response rates, duration of response, and quality of life (exploratory). Patients will be followed for ≥5 years after the last patient initiated induction therapy. Enrollment in MAGNIFY began in March 2014; as of Jan 2016, 133 patients are enrolled.

Interventions

DRUGLenalidomide
DRUGRituximab

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\-- Age ≥18 years * Histologically confirmed Follicular Lymphoma (FL, Grade 1, 2, 3a, or 3b), Transformed FL, Marginal Zone Lymphoma, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma * Must have documented relapsed, refractory or Progressive Disease after last treatment with systemic therapy * Bi-dimensionally measurable disease * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status \< 2 * Adequate bone marrow function * Willingness to follow pregnancy precautions

Exclusion criteria

* Histology other than follicular or marginal zone lymphoma or clinical evidence of transformation or Grade 3b follicular lymphoma * Any medical condition (other than the underlying lymphoma) that requires chronic steroid use * Subjects taking corticosteroids during the last 1 week prior treatment, unless administered at a dose equivalent to \< 20 mg/day of prednisone * Systemic anti-lymphoma therapy within 28 days or use of antibody agents within 4 weeks use of radioimmunotherapy within 3 months * Known seropositive for or active viral infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Known sensitivity or allergy to murine products * Presence or history of central nervous system involvement by lymphoma. Subjects who are at a risk for a thromboembolic event and are not willing to take prophylaxis for it * Any condition that places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to objective disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of first dose of maintenance therapy to the date of the first objective documentation of tumor progression or death due to any cause. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. The PFS events were determined using a modification of the IWG 1999 criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of Response (IOR)From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to death from any cause (up to approximately 432 weeks)Improvement of Response (IOR) is the percentage of participants with improved tumor response during the maintenance phase (converted from partial response at end of induction to complete response or complete response unconfirmed as best response) and participants who converted from stable disease at the end of induction period to partial response or better as best response during maintenance phase.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)From the first dose date of maintenance therapy up to CR, CRu, PR, or treatment change (up to approximately 432 weeks)The overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best response of at least partial response (including complete response, complete response unconfirmed and partial response) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.
Complete Response Rate (CRR)From the first dose date of maintenance therapy up to CR or CRu (up to approximately 432 weeks)Best Complete Response Rate (CRR), defined as the proportion of participants with a best response of at least CRu (including CR and CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.
Duration of Response (DOR)From the initial response (at least PR) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)DOR is from initial response (at least CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death. Participants who have not progressed or died at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression. Participants who change treatment without evidence of disease progression will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression prior to treatment change. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates.
Time to Next Anti-lymphoma TreatmentFrom the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of first documented administration of new anti-lymphoma therapy (up to approximately 300 weeks)Time to next anti-lymphoma treatment is defined as the time from the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of first documented administration of new anti-lymphoma therapy. Participants without new treatment therapy will be censored at the last visit. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates.
Overall Survival (OS)From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to death from any cause (up to approximately 480 weeks)Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the first dose date of maintenance therapy and death from any cause. Participants who complete the study and are still alive at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last visit date or the last contact date, whichever is later. Participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the clinical data cut-off date will also be censored at the time of the last contact. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates and Hazard Ratio (HR).
Duration of Complete Response (DOCR)From the initial CR/CRu after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)Duration of complete response (DOCR) is calculated as the time from the initial response (CR or CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. Participants who have not progressed or died at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression. Participants who change treatment without evidence of disease progression will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression prior to treatment change.
Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)Number of participants experiencing AEs, SAEs, AEs leading to study discontinuation, and AEs of interest (AEIs). An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization; results significant disability; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs are defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment in the study, or if a pre-existing condition worsens in severity or becomes serious after receiving the first dose of study treatment.
Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsFrom first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)The number of participants who experienced adverse events related to vital sign measurements
Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersFrom first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)Clinical laboratory values in induction period include any laboratory values that are taken after the first dose date of induction therapy through 28 days after the last dose date of induction therapy or before the first dose date of maintenance therapy, whichever is earlier. Graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 4.03, except for tumor flare reaction, which is accessed using NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with zero maximum grade are excluded.
Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersFrom first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)Clinical laboratory values in induction period include any laboratory values that are taken after the first dose date of induction therapy through 28 days after the last dose date of therapy. Graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 4.03, except for tumor flare reaction, which is accessed using NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with zero maximum grade are excluded.
Time to Histological TransformationFrom the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of histological transformation (up to approximately 432 weeks)Time to histological transformation is defined as from the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of histological transformation as measured based on documentation of histological transformation (as assessed by the investigator). Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. In case of clinical suspicion of transformation, including rapid disease progression, unexpected changes in B symptoms or rapidly increasing LDH, a biopsy should be performed. In this clinical trial, histological transformation will be considered disease progression. This endpoint will not be calculated for participants randomized with transformed Follicular Lymphoma (tFL).

Countries

Germany, Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

503 participants joined this study. All participants started in the induction period; only those who did not progress after 12 cycles of treatment were randomized to receive treatment in the maintenance period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
All participants who were enrolled into the study.
503
Total503

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Induction PeriodAdverse Event2000
Induction PeriodDeath11100
Induction PeriodLost to Follow-up1000
Induction PeriodOther Reasons1300
Induction PeriodProgressive Disease400
Induction PeriodProtocol Violation100
Induction PeriodWithdrawal by Subject6000
Maintenance PeriodAdverse Event077
Maintenance PeriodDeath0153
Maintenance PeriodLost to Follow-up020
Maintenance PeriodOther reasons085
Maintenance PeriodProgressive Disease0623
Maintenance PeriodProtocol Violation011
Maintenance PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0184

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
294 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
209 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
463 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
468 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
215 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
288 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
112 / 50026 / 13432 / 132
other
Total, other adverse events
491 / 500129 / 134106 / 132
serious
Total, serious adverse events
172 / 50057 / 13422 / 132

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of first dose of maintenance therapy to the date of the first objective documentation of tumor progression or death due to any cause. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. The PFS events were determined using a modification of the IWG 1999 criteria.

Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to objective disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabProgression Free Survival (PFS)263.1 Weeks
Arm B: RituximabProgression Free Survival (PFS)229.1 Weeks
p-value: 0.329695% CI: [0.6, 1.2]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Complete Response Rate (CRR)

Best Complete Response Rate (CRR), defined as the proportion of participants with a best response of at least CRu (including CR and CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.

Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy up to CR or CRu (up to approximately 432 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabComplete Response Rate (CRR)60.7 Percentage of participants
Arm B: RituximabComplete Response Rate (CRR)58.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Complete Response (DOCR)

Duration of complete response (DOCR) is calculated as the time from the initial response (CR or CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. Participants who have not progressed or died at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression. Participants who change treatment without evidence of disease progression will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression prior to treatment change.

Time frame: From the initial CR/CRu after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)

Population: The analysis is only performed for participants who have achieved CR or CRu after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabDuration of Complete Response (DOCR)298.0 Weeks
Arm B: RituximabDuration of Complete Response (DOCR)NA Weeks
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is from initial response (at least CRu) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death. Participants who have not progressed or died at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression. Participants who change treatment without evidence of disease progression will be censored at the last assessment showing no progression prior to treatment change. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates.

Time frame: From the initial response (at least PR) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to treatment change to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 432 weeks)

Population: The analysis is only performed for participants who have achieved PR or better after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.~Arm B includes 3 additional participants who achieved CR/CRu/PR in the follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabDuration of Response (DOR)268.3 Weeks
Arm B: RituximabDuration of Response (DOR)306.0 Weeks
Secondary

Improvement of Response (IOR)

Improvement of Response (IOR) is the percentage of participants with improved tumor response during the maintenance phase (converted from partial response at end of induction to complete response or complete response unconfirmed as best response) and participants who converted from stable disease at the end of induction period to partial response or better as best response during maintenance phase.

Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to death from any cause (up to approximately 432 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabImprovement of Response (IOR)20 Percentage of participants
Arm B: RituximabImprovement of Response (IOR)11.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best response of at least partial response (including complete response, complete response unconfirmed and partial response) after the first dose date of maintenance therapy and prior to any treatment change.

Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy up to CR, CRu, PR, or treatment change (up to approximately 432 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabOverall Response Rate (ORR)85.2 Percentage of participants
Arm B: RituximabOverall Response Rate (ORR)79.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the first dose date of maintenance therapy and death from any cause. Participants who complete the study and are still alive at the time of the clinical data cutoff date will be censored at the last visit date or the last contact date, whichever is later. Participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the clinical data cut-off date will also be censored at the time of the last contact. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates and Hazard Ratio (HR).

Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to death from any cause (up to approximately 480 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabOverall Survival (OS)NA Weeks
Arm B: RituximabOverall Survival (OS)NA Weeks
p-value: 0.122295% CI: [0.4, 1.1]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital Signs

The number of participants who experienced adverse events related to vital sign measurements

Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypotension22 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypertension34 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypoxia5 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypotension4 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypertension9 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypoxia2 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypertension6 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypoxia0 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Vital SignsHypotension5 Participants
Secondary

Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Number of participants experiencing AEs, SAEs, AEs leading to study discontinuation, and AEs of interest (AEIs). An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization; results significant disability; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs are defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment in the study, or if a pre-existing condition worsens in severity or becomes serious after receiving the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants experiencing at least one TEAE499 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants experiencing at least one serious TEAE172 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants experiencing at least one TEAE133 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants experiencing at least one serious TEAE57 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants experiencing at least one TEAE120 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants experiencing at least one serious TEAE22 Participants
Secondary

Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology Parameters

Clinical laboratory values in induction period include any laboratory values that are taken after the first dose date of induction therapy through 28 days after the last dose date of induction therapy or before the first dose date of maintenance therapy, whichever is earlier. Graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 4.03, except for tumor flare reaction, which is accessed using NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with zero maximum grade are excluded.

Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersAnemia - Grade 331 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLeukopenia - Grade 3101 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersThrombocytopenia - Grade 329 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersNeutropenia - Grade 3103 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLymphopenia - Grade 3126 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersAnemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLeukopenia - Grade 417 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersThrombocytopenia - Grade 47 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersNeutropenia - Grade 494 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLymphopenia - Grade 420 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersNeutropenia - Grade 425 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersAnemia - Grade 37 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersAnemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLymphopenia - Grade 331 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLeukopenia - Grade 319 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLymphopenia - Grade 410 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersThrombocytopenia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersThrombocytopenia - Grade 32 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLeukopenia - Grade 45 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersNeutropenia - Grade 324 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersThrombocytopenia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersNeutropenia - Grade 310 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLymphopenia - Grade 321 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersAnemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersNeutropenia - Grade 46 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLeukopenia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersAnemia - Grade 30 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLymphopenia - Grade 42 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersLeukopenia - Grade 36 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Hematology ParametersThrombocytopenia - Grade 31 Participants
Secondary

Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry Parameters

Clinical laboratory values in induction period include any laboratory values that are taken after the first dose date of induction therapy through 28 days after the last dose date of therapy. Graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 4.03, except for tumor flare reaction, which is accessed using NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with zero maximum grade are excluded.

Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 64 weeks for induction period and 427 weeks for maintenance period)

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypophosphatemia - Grade 41 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 314 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypokalemia - Grade 330 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercalcemia - Grade 43 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 39 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercalcemia - Grade 37 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypocalcemia - Grade 45 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperbilirubinemia - Grade 35 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperbilirubinemia - Grade 41 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperkalemia- Grade 41 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypokalemia - Grade 44 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 40 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypophosphatemia - Grade 317 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 40 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperuricemia - Grade 49 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercreatininemia - Grade 33 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypocalcemia - Grade 37 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercreatininemia - Grade 41 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperuricemia - Grade 340 Participants
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperkalemia- Grade 34 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypokalemia - Grade 38 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperkalemia- Grade 30 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypocalcemia - Grade 31 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercalcemia - Grade 30 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypophosphatemia - Grade 36 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercreatininemia - Grade 31 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperuricemia - Grade 313 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 33 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 31 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperbilirubinemia - Grade 33 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypokalemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperkalemia- Grade 42 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypocalcemia - Grade 45 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercalcemia - Grade 45 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypophosphatemia - Grade 41 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercreatininemia - Grade 42 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperuricemia - Grade 44 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperbilirubinemia - Grade 41 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperkalemia- Grade 31 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercalcemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperuricemia - Grade 320 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperbilirubinemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypophosphatemia - Grade 41 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercreatininemia - Grade 30 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercreatininemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypophosphatemia - Grade 32 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypokalemia - Grade 34 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperuricemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypercalcemia - Grade 30 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypokalemia - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperbilirubinemia - Grade 31 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypocalcemia - Grade 30 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHyperkalemia- Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 30 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 40 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersHypocalcemia - Grade 42 Participants
Arm B: RituximabParticipants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Serum Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase Increased - Grade 30 Participants
Secondary

Time to Histological Transformation

Time to histological transformation is defined as from the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of histological transformation as measured based on documentation of histological transformation (as assessed by the investigator). Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates. In case of clinical suspicion of transformation, including rapid disease progression, unexpected changes in B symptoms or rapidly increasing LDH, a biopsy should be performed. In this clinical trial, histological transformation will be considered disease progression. This endpoint will not be calculated for participants randomized with transformed Follicular Lymphoma (tFL).

Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of histological transformation (up to approximately 432 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B without transformed Follicular Lymphoma (tFL)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabTime to Histological TransformationNA Weeks
Arm B: RituximabTime to Histological TransformationNA Weeks
Secondary

Time to Next Anti-lymphoma Treatment

Time to next anti-lymphoma treatment is defined as the time from the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of first documented administration of new anti-lymphoma therapy. Participants without new treatment therapy will be censored at the last visit. Analysis was based on Kaplan Meier estimates.

Time frame: From the first dose date of maintenance therapy to the time of first documented administration of new anti-lymphoma therapy (up to approximately 300 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants in Arm A and Arm B, as prespecified in the protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Lenalidomide + RituximabTime to Next Anti-lymphoma TreatmentNA Weeks
Arm B: RituximabTime to Next Anti-lymphoma TreatmentNA Weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026