Skip to content

A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

An Open-label Study of the Effect of Tarceva Monotherapy on Treatment Response in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer for Whom Tarceva Monotherapy is Considered the Best Option

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01996332
Enrollment
1805
Registered
2013-11-27
Start date
2004-04-30
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2014-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral Tarceva in patients with advanced NSCLC for whom Tarceva monotherapy is considered the best therapeutic option. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months.

Interventions

DRUGerlotinib [Tarceva]

150 mg/day until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients \>=18 years of age; * locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (Stage IIIB or IV); * not a candidate for curative surgery or radical chemotherapy; * no brain metastases, or clinically stable metastases for \>=2 months.

Exclusion criteria

* radiotherapy over the previous 2 weeks; * weight loss \>10% in the previous 6 weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Disease Progression or Death by Line of TreatmentBaseline, every 6-8 weeks up to 3 years until disease progression or deathTime to progression or death was defined as the time from inclusion to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Benefit by Line of TreatmentBaseline, every 6-8 weeks up to 3 years or until deathEfficacy was analyzed in terms of clinical benefit, defined as the sum of the number of participants achieving complete response \[CR\], partial response \[PR\], or stable disease \[SD\]. Tumor response was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.0. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥)30 percent (%) decrease in sum of longest diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum longest diameters associated to non-progressive disease response for non target lesions. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as reference smallest sum of longest dimensions since treatment started associated to non-progressive disease response for non target lesions.
Overall Survival (OS) by Line of TreatmentBaseline, every 6-8 weeks up to 3 years, or until deathTime in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date or last known alive date \[if death date was unavailable\] minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1 divided by 30.44).

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Three cohorts were established in participants with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on previous chemotherapy treatment received: first line of treatment (where conventional chemotherapy is not indicated), second line of treatment, and third and subsequent lines of treatment. Inclusion was competitive.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Erlotinib 150 mg/Day
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg/day, orally, until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
1,805
Total1,805

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event117
Overall StudyClinical Deterioration28
Overall StudyDeath264
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1,245
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up34
Overall StudyOther20
Overall StudyPhysician Decision17
Overall StudyProtocol Violation9
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject71

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicErlotinib 150 mg/Day
Age, Continuous63.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.75
Sex: Female, Male
Female
520 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1285 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1,695 / 1,797
serious
Total, serious adverse events
566 / 1,805

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Disease Progression or Death by Line of Treatment

Time to progression or death was defined as the time from inclusion to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Baseline, every 6-8 weeks up to 3 years until disease progression or death

Population: ITT Population; data were analyzed in 6 cohorts, with erlotinib treatment as: 1) first line; 2) maintenance after first line; 3) second line; 4) maintenance after second line; 5) third or subsequent line; or 6) maintenance after third line

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayTime to Disease Progression or Death by Line of Treatment1st Line3.4 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayTime to Disease Progression or Death by Line of TreatmentMaintenance after 1st Line4.7 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayTime to Disease Progression or Death by Line of Treatment2nd Line2.7 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayTime to Disease Progression or Death by Line of TreatmentMaintenance after 2nd Line3.9 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayTime to Disease Progression or Death by Line of Treatment3rd or Subsequent Line2.4 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayTime to Disease Progression or Death by Line of TreatmentMaintenance after 3rd Line2.8 months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) by Line of Treatment

Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date or last known alive date \[if death date was unavailable\] minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1 divided by 30.44).

Time frame: Baseline, every 6-8 weeks up to 3 years, or until death

Population: ITT Population; data were analyzed in 6 cohorts, with erlotinib treatment as: 1) first line; 2) maintenance after first line; 3) second line; 4) maintenance after second line; 5) third or subsequent line; or 6) maintenance after third line

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayOverall Survival (OS) by Line of Treatment1st Line6.4 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayOverall Survival (OS) by Line of TreatmentSequential treatment after 1st line12.1 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayOverall Survival (OS) by Line of Treatment2nd Line5.9 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayOverall Survival (OS) by Line of TreatmentSequential treatment after 2nd line7.1 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayOverall Survival (OS) by Line of Treatment3rd Line or subsequent5.2 months
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayOverall Survival (OS) by Line of TreatmentSequential treatment after 3rd line3.9 months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Benefit by Line of Treatment

Efficacy was analyzed in terms of clinical benefit, defined as the sum of the number of participants achieving complete response \[CR\], partial response \[PR\], or stable disease \[SD\]. Tumor response was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.0. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥)30 percent (%) decrease in sum of longest diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum longest diameters associated to non-progressive disease response for non target lesions. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as reference smallest sum of longest dimensions since treatment started associated to non-progressive disease response for non target lesions.

Time frame: Baseline, every 6-8 weeks up to 3 years or until death

Population: Response evaluable population: participants with measurable disease and with matching criteria to have a response assessment; data were analyzed in 6 cohorts, with erlotinib treatment as: 1) first line; 2) maintenance after first line; 3) second line; 4) maintenance after second line; 5) third or subsequent line; or 6) maintenance after third line

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Benefit by Line of Treatment1st line70.32 percentage of participants
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Benefit by Line of TreatmentMaintenance treatment after 1st line70.00 percentage of participants
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Benefit by Line of Treatment2nd line58.04 percentage of participants
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Benefit by Line of TreatmentMaintenance treatment after 2nd line73.68 percentage of participants
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Benefit by Line of Treatment3rd or subsequent line52.71 percentage of participants
Erlotinib 150 mg/DayPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Benefit by Line of TreatmentMaintenance treatment after 3rd line50.00 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026