Skip to content

Use of iPro™2 in Real Life Diabetes Management of Type 2 Patients in India

Use of iPro™2 in Real Life Diabetes Management of Type 2 Patients in India

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01995539
Enrollment
181
Registered
2013-11-26
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2018-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

Type 2

Brief summary

The purpose of the India iPro2 study is to demonstrate that iPro2 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) evaluation enables Health Care Professional (HCP)s treating patients in India with type 2 diabetes to get a better understanding of their patient's metabolic fluctuations, and support appropriate therapeutic intervention.

Detailed description

The study will be designed to demonstrate the value of iPro2 in real-world diabetes management in type 2 patients in India. It will be an interventional post-market, prospective, multi-center study with a data review performed after 30 subjects have completed the trial. During the course of the study, patients will undergo two iPro2 evaluations: * First iPro2 test (Visit 1 \[application\] & 2 \[removal\]) * Second iPro2 test (Visit 3 \[application\] & 4 \[removal\]) Patient and HCP questionnaires will be administered at Visit 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. These questionnaires aim to assess the impact of an iPro2 evaluation on the physicians understanding of their patient's metabolic fluctuations and its support of therapeutic interventions. They will also investigate the subjects understanding (both pre & post iPro2 evaluation) of the concept of glycemic variability and the importance of compliance to HCP recommendations.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALtherapy regimen

Subjects will be recommend changes in therapy regimens.

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic Diabetes
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is \> 18 years to ≤ 70 years of age 2. Subject has been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 1 year and is currently being treated with an oral anti-hyperglycemic medication and/or insulin 3. Subject's A1C \> 8.0% to ≤ 10% conducted in the last 4 weeks 4. Subject, or legal representative, has signed the study Patient Informed Consent Form (PIC) 5. Subject is willing to comply with the study procedures

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject is unable to tolerate tape adhesive in the area of sensor placement 2. Subject is pregnant, or is expecting to become pregnant during the course of the trial per Investigator discretion. 3. Subject has no experience with SMBG and blood glucose meter use 4. Subject has undergone an iPro evaluation during the past 6 months 5. Subject has any unresolved adverse skin condition in the area of sensor placement (e.g., psoriasis, rash, Staphylococcus infection) 6. Subject is actively participating or planning to actively participate in an investigational study (drug or device) wherein he/she has received treatment from an investigational study drug or investigational study device in the last 2 weeks 7. Subject has a history of visual impairment which would not allow subject to participate in the study and perform all study procedures safely, as determined by the investigator 8. Subject has unresolved alcohol or drug addiction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in A1C at 3 Months3 monthsDescriptive analysis of change in A1C from baseline to end of 3-month study period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE).3 monthsEvaluation of incidence of SADE during the study.

Countries

India

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
iPro2 Use
All subjects wearing iPro2, having therapy regimens, and having baseline and EOS A1C tests
181
Total181

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5
Overall StudyScreening Failure1
Overall StudySubject missed visit 3,4, came in for V51
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Investigator15
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristiciPro2 Use
Age, Continuous54.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.06
Region of Enrollment
India
181 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
111 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 181
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 181
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 181

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in A1C at 3 Months

Descriptive analysis of change in A1C from baseline to end of 3-month study period

Time frame: 3 months

Population: 181 subjects consented and screened; 1 subject screen failed; 148 subjects completed study; 32 subjects not completed study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
iPro2 UseChange From Baseline in A1C at 3 Months-0.6 percentStandard Deviation 1.11
Secondary

Number of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE).

Evaluation of incidence of SADE during the study.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
iPro2 UseNumber of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE).0 events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026