Skip to content

Use of Capnography in EGD and Colonoscopy With Moderate Sedation.

Does the Use of Capnography in Routine EGD and Colonoscopy Targeting Moderate Sedation With a Benzodiazepine and Opioid Improve Safety?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01994785
Enrollment
452
Registered
2013-11-26
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2017-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apnea, Hypopnea, Hypotension, Hypoxia

Keywords

Sedation, Endoscopy, Capnography

Brief summary

This study will provide capnography monitoring during routine upper endoscopy and colonoscopy with moderate sedation in order to see if it improves safety.

Detailed description

The majority of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures currently performed in the United States are done under moderate sedation, primarily utilizing the combination of an opioid and benzodiazepine. The endoscopy team administers the medications, most commonly the endoscopy nursing team at the discretion of the endoscopist, with careful cardiopulmonary monitoring during the procedure. The use of sedation can lead to serious unplanned adverse events. Cardiopulmonary events related to the use of sedation in GI endoscopy include hypotension, hypoxia, and hypopnea/apnea. The most common of these adverse events is hypoxia, which can occur in 10-70% of patients. Although most of these events are transient and respond to supplemental oxygenation, studies have shown electrocardiographic signs of cardiac ischemia in patients with no known preexisting heart disease. Pulse oximetry can help detect hypoxia related to perfusion deficits (cardiac) or ventilation factors (respiratory) however, it is not designed to detect ventilator precursors of alveolar hypoventilation, which primarily present as decreased respiratory rate or hypopnea/apnea. Capnography utilizes the near-infrared spectrophotometric absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide (CO2) at 420 nm to provide graphic assessment of the ventilation status via the partial pressure of carbon dioxide during the respiratory cycle. Previous studies have shown it to improve safety by detecting early indicators of hypoxia and/or signs of alveolar hypoventilation. Studies have shown that when targeting deep sedation in advanced endoscopic procedures utilizing capnography was superior to pulse oximetry alone in detecting respiratory depression. There is also evidence that shows utilizing capnography in advanced endoscopic procedures significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxia versus standard monitoring with the procedural team blinded to the capnographic data (132 blinded vs. 49 open, P\<.001) and rates of hypoxia (69% blinded vs. 46% open, P\<.001) were significantly lower with capnography monitoring. Routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy with moderate sedation is safe with rates of sedation associated adverse events occurring in 8 per 100,000 cases. Lightdale and colleagues showed in a prospective, double blinded randomized controlled trial in a pediatric population undergoing routine EGD or colonoscopy targeting moderate sedation with opioid-benzodiazepine combinations that patients in the intervention capnography arm were less likely (4% vs. 20%, P\<.03) to have an intra-procedural episodes of hypoxia (defined as SpO2\<95% for \>5sec). No adverse events related to episodes of hypoxia were reported in this trial, but it was underpowered to evaluate this outcome. To our knowledge, there is no data on use of capnography in adult patients undergoing EGD and colonoscopy targeting moderate sedation with the combination of an opioid and benzodiazepine. The American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) has recently updated their standards for basic anesthetic monitoring to now state that during moderate sedation all patients should have capnographic monitoring. This was updated from the previous standards for basic monitoring that stated capnography could be used during these levels of sedation. This is a significant change in the practice model for monitoring patients undergoing routine endoscopy with moderate sedation and, as the standards for basic monitoring are often used as a basis for regulatory guidelines applied to hospital or ambulatory care centers, the addition of requiring capnographic monitoring changes the landscape of procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy across the United States. The evidence cited for this update in monitoring guidelines included the Lightdale pediatric endoscopy study and our groups study that utilized capnography in advanced endoscopic procedures. There was no data available in adult patients undergoing routine EGD or colonoscopy at the time of the updated guidelines. The extrapolation of advanced endoscopic procedures to routine endoscopy is of limited use as the procedures are targeting different levels of sedation (deep vs. moderate, respectively) and the length of the procedures is significantly different. The rationale for not using capnography in moderate sedation arises from its ability to lead to false alarms, such as pseudo-apnea secondary to swallowing or failure to monitor both the oral and nasal airways for respiratory activity, as some patients will transition to nasal or mouth breathing during sedation. These alarms during a procedure may lead to interruption, delay, or early termination. Increased costs for capnography equipment and having appropriately trained endoscopy team members to interpret capnography results will be difficult to accomplish with no patient data supporting the effectiveness of its use in routine EGD and colonoscopy.

Interventions

Capnographic Monitoring: Patients will undergo procedures with real-time capnographic monitoring

Sponsors

American College of Gastroenterology
CollaboratorOTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18yrs with full decision making capacity * Scheduled for elective upper endoscopy or colonoscopy with moderate sedation

Exclusion criteria

* ASAPS class III or higher. * History of a demonstrated allergy or intolerance to a benzodiazepine or opioid * Patients scheduled for both upper endoscopy and colonoscopy during the same endoscopy day

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants Experiencing Hypoxia During Capnography Monitoring.One day--data is collected during one endoscopic procedure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EGD Capnography Open
Capnographic monitoring during EGD - Data made available to study staff throughout procedure Capnographic Monitoring: Capnographic Monitoring: Patients will undergo procedures with real-time capnographic monitoring
101
EGD Capnography Blinded
Capnographic monitoring during EGD - Data made available to study staff only if necessary for safety reasons Capnographic Monitoring: Capnographic Monitoring: Patients will undergo procedures with real-time capnographic monitoring
108
Colonoscopy Capnography Open
Capnographic monitoring during Colonoscopy - Data made available to study staff throughout procedure Capnographic Monitoring: Capnographic Monitoring: Patients will undergo procedures with real-time capnographic monitoring
117
Colonoscopy Capnography Blinded
Capnographic monitoring during Colonoscopy - Data made available to study staff only if necessary for safety reasons Capnographic Monitoring: Capnographic Monitoring: Patients will undergo procedures with real-time capnographic monitoring
114
Total440

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEGD Capnography OpenEGD Capnography BlindedColonoscopy Capnography OpenColonoscopy Capnography BlindedTotal
Age, Continuous51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
101 participants108 participants117 participants114 participants440 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants69 Participants58 Participants59 Participants251 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants39 Participants59 Participants55 Participants189 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1010 / 1080 / 1170 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1010 / 1080 / 1170 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Experiencing Hypoxia During Capnography Monitoring.

Time frame: One day--data is collected during one endoscopic procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EGD Capnography OpenNumber of Participants Experiencing Hypoxia During Capnography Monitoring.54 Participants
EGD Capnography BlindedNumber of Participants Experiencing Hypoxia During Capnography Monitoring.59 Participants
Colonoscopy Capnography OpenNumber of Participants Experiencing Hypoxia During Capnography Monitoring.61 Participants
Colonoscopy Capnography BlindedNumber of Participants Experiencing Hypoxia During Capnography Monitoring.63 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026