Skip to content

Two phosphAte taRGets in End-stage Renal Disease Trial (TARGET)

Two phosphAte taRGets in End-stage Renal Disease Trial (TARGET): Intensive vs Liberalized Phosphate Control in Hemodialysis Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01994733
Acronym
TARGET
Enrollment
104
Registered
2013-11-26
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2015-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End-stage Renal Disease

Keywords

end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, mineral metabolism, serum phosphate, phosphate binders

Brief summary

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who have elevated serum phosphate (P) levels have significantly higher mortality rates compared to those with normal P. In patients receiving conventional dialysis regimens, serum P may be lowered through dietary intervention and use of P binders, though these have potentially important side effects and may adversely impact quality of life. Whether lowering P, and / or targeting specific P levels improve survival and clinical outcomes is unknown. Despite this uncertainty, over 90% of patients with ESRD receive P lowering therapy and guidelines for the care of patients with ESRD are increasingly calling for more aggressive phosphate lowering. This intensive P lowering results in extra medications (and their associated side-effects), and higher health care costs. We are uncertain whether the intensification of P control results in measurable benefits to patients with ESRD. The overall goal of this pilot trial is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial of intensive vs liberalized phosphate control among hemodialysis recipients.

Interventions

DRUGCalcium carbonate ( Intensive phosphate control)

Individuals randomized to this arm will be exposed to a treatment strategy that targets a P of \< 1.50 mmol/L, reflecting the recommendations of current guidelines. Titration of the calcium carbonate dose will be the core of this approach and this will be complemented by usual recommendations regarding dietary P restriction. Dietitians will be available to provide counseling with regards to any aspect of the end-stage renal disease diet, as per usual dialysis unit practice

DRUGCalcium carbonate (Liberalized phosphate control)

Individuals in this arm will be exposed to a treatment strategy that allows P to rise above 2.00 mmol/L. This will be accomplished through structured reduction of P binders already in use (as per the algorithm detailed below). Rescue P binding will be instituted if P rises above 2.50 mmol/L. Dietitians will be available to provide counseling regarding any aspect of the end-stage renal disease diet, as per usual dialysis unit practice, but will not provide counseling on dietary P restriction unless the P rises above 2.50 mmol/L.

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Unity Health Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 yrs 2. Receiving chronic hemodialysis for \> 90 days, 3. Dialysis prescription is currently no more than 4 sessions per week and prescribed as 3-5 hrs per session 4. Most recent P value 1.30-2.50 mmol/L 5. Receipt of a calcium-based P binder

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient is booked (with a known surgical date) for a live donor kidney transplant in the next 26 weeks 2. Planned switch to a dialysis schedule that involves \> 16 hours per week of therapy within the next 26 weeks. 3. Planned switch to peritoneal dialysis within the next 26 weeks 4. Pregnancy 5. Albumin-corrected serum calcium \> 2.60 mmol/L in the past year requiring reduction of the calcium carbonate dose 6. History of calciphylaxis 7. Attending nephrologist believes that an otherwise eligible patient is mandated- on clinical grounds- to have a P value that is targeted to \< 1.50 mmol/L or \> 2.00 mmol/L 8. Attending nephrologist believes an otherwise eligible patient is not a candidate for escalation of the current calcium dose 9. Co-enrollment in a clinical trial where the intervention is deemed to interfere with the adherence, safety or efficacy of the intervention provided herein

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Serum phosphate concentration26 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients developing calcific uremic arteriolopathy (ie, calciphylaxis)26 weeks
Number of patients who successfully achieved target serum P at week 26 based on the arm to which they were randomized26 weeks
Treatment compliance as defined by taking the study medication at least 80% of the time26 weeks
Number of hospitalizations for vascular reasons that are unrelated to dialysis access26 weeks
Number of serious adverse events26 weeks
Proportion of patients developing serum calcium > 2.60 mmol/L26 weeks
Number of fractures26 weeks
Change in quality-of-life26 weeks
Proportion of patients with a vascular death or non-fatal vascular event26 weeks

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026