Skip to content

Efficacy of Lower Tourniquet Pressure During Total Knee Arthroplasty

The Efficacy of Using Lower Tourniquet Pressure During Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison With Conventional Tourniquet Pressure Group

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01993758
Enrollment
160
Registered
2013-11-25
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2014-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

tourniquet pressure, total knee arthroplasty

Brief summary

This study aims to determine whether the lower tourniquet pressure, which is set by adding 120mmHg (millimeter of mercury) on the systolic blood pressure just before tourniquet inflation, are efficient and safe during total knee arthroplasty, compared with the conventional tourniquet pressure: 150mmHg above the systolic blood pressure before tourniquet inflation.

Detailed description

We will compare the two groups of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, which the tourniquet pressure will be set differently: systolic blood pressure plus 120mmHg vs. systolic blood pressure plus 150mmHg, the conventional method, in terms of efficacy and safety.

Interventions

PROCEDURELow tourniquet pressure

Tourniquet pressure set as 120mmHg above the systolic blood pressure just before tourniquet inflation

PROCEDUREConventional tourniquet pressure

Tourniquet pressure set as 150mmHg above the systolic blood pressure just before tourniquet inflation

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* Systolic blood pressure measured at ward \> 200mmHg * Thigh circumference \> 78cm * Anesthesia other than spinal anesthesia * Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty * The patients who disagreed the enrollment of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acquisition of bloodless surgical field just after skin incisionjust after skin incision during operationDichotomous variable determined during operation by operator (Yes or No)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Increasement of tourniquet pressure to acquire bloodless surgical fieldafter skin incision though the point of tourniquet deflationWe will increase the tourniquet pressure by 30mmHg from the initial tourniquet pressure, if we will fail to achieve bloodless surgical field during operation. The increasement of tourniquet pressure will be recorded if it will be needed during operation.
Thigh pain on the site of tourniquet applicationpostoperative 2nd daymeasured by 11-point numerical visual analog scale (VAS)and 5-Likert scale
Knee painpostoperative 2nd daymeasured by 11-point numerical visual analog scale (VAS)and 5-Likert scale
Failure of acquiring bloodless surgical field during operationafter skin incision through the point of tourniquet deflation
Nerve palsywithin 7 days after surgery
symptomatic venous-thromboembolismwithin 7 days after surgeryIt includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism which are symptomatic and diagnosed by confirmative test, such as CT angiogram.
Skin problem on the site of tourniquet applicationposteoperative 2nd dayIt includes ecchymosis, bullae formation and skin necrosis.

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactT K Kim, MD, PhD
osktk@snubh.org82-31-787-7196

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026