Skip to content

Improving Palliative Care Through Teamwork

Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Nursing Homes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01990742
Acronym
IMPACTT
Enrollment
31
Registered
2013-11-21
Start date
2013-09-27
Completion date
2017-04-01
Last updated
2018-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Palliative Care

Brief summary

One in three Americans dies in a nursing home (NH) or in a hospital, shortly following transfer from a long-term care facility. The proportion of deaths occurring in NHs is projected to increase to 40% by 2020. Excellence in palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care must become a priority for these long-term care institutions. However, findings from NHs point to high incidence of pain and poor management of other symptoms and excessive reliance on hospitalizations, indicating inadequate EOL care quality. Expert opinion and research have suggested that poor EOL quality in NHs may be due to lack of palliative care training among staff and absence of EOL care protocols or guidelines, but research demonstrating that attention to these factors improves outcomes is absent. While dedicated care teams have been shown to improve outcomes for NH residents in need of specialized care, the impact of palliative care teams in improving resident outcomes has remained largely unstudied and untested. This will be the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of palliative care teams (PCTeam) on resident and staff outcomes, and care processes, in NHs. Our objective is to demonstrate, using a randomized controlled trial design and a difference in difference analytic approach, that nursing home-based palliative care practice guidelines implemented through PCTeams will improve quality of care processes and outcomes for residents at the end of life. We will adapt existing palliative care guidelines for EOL care, endorsed by the National Quality Forum (NQF), to the NH environment, deploy the adapted practice guidelines through a PCTeam model, and evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention on resident EOL outcomes and staff care processes and outcomes. The specific aims (SA) will address the following questions: SA 1: Is PCTeam intervention effective in improving NH residents' EOL outcomes? SA 2: Is PCTeam intervention effective in improving NH staff EOL care processes and outcomes? In the context of these specific aims we will test the following hypotheses: H1: Residents in NHs in the intervention arm, compared to the control, will achieve better EOL risk-adjusted outcomes and care processes with regard to: * Pain * Dyspnea * Depression * In-hospital deaths * Hospitalizations * Advance directives H2: Direct care staff in NHs in the intervention arm, compared to the control, will achieve better EOL processes and outcomes measured by: * Assessment of EOL symptoms * Delivery of EOL care * Communication/coordination among providers * Communication with residents/families * Teamwork effectiveness * Staff satisfaction H3: Family caregivers of decedent residents in the intervention NHs, compared to the control, will report receiving more patient and family centered care as measured by higher levels of satisfaction with: * Shared decision making between providers, the patient and the family * Care that is respectful of the patient wishes and dignity * Attention to the emotional and spiritual needs of the family. 31 NHs in upstate New York have been recruited for the study (letters of support). Stakeholders include residents, family members, staff, policy makers, and others. The intervention will deploy theTeamSTEPPS, a team development model created by the Department of Defense and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPalliative Care Team (PCTeam)

Palliative care teams will be established and will round with residents in the intervention nursing homes.

Sponsors

University of California, Irvine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* long-stay nursing home residents (\>90 days)

Exclusion criteria

* rehabilitative, post-acute residents (\<90 days)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital Site of Death: Number of Decedents Cared for in an Enrolled and Assigned NH Facility, Who Were Transferred to a Hospital and Died in the Hospital During the Study Period1 yearThis outcome measure, Hospital Site of Death, assesses whether death occured in a nursing home or in a hospital following transfer from the nursing home, among nursing home residents who were cared for in an enrolled facility.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HospitalizationsThe last 90 days of lifeNumber of hospitalizations in the last 90 days of life among decedents being cared for in the enrolled nursing homes

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Nursing Home Residents in Moderate-to-severe Painup to 6 months prior to deathPresence of moderate-to-severe pain within 6 months of the date of death, among decedents cared for in the enrolled nursing homes. The verbal descriptor pain scale, where the resident is asked to rate the intensity of their worst pain in the last five day was most often used, where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain , 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain, 4 = very severe pain, and 9 = unable to answer. Lower numbers (0 or 1 ) on the scale are preferred, and a lower percentage of residents reporting pain intensity in the moderate or higher ranges is a better outcome. The verbal descriptor scale can be shared with elders verbally, as the name implies, or by asking the resident to point to a setting on a visual thermometer with these word choices.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Nursing Homes, not individual participants, were enrolled in this RCT study, and were the unit of intervention. However, the outcomes analysis was performed on decedents who were cared for in the enrolled Nursing Homes.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Palliative Care Team (PCTeam)
Palliative Care Team (PCTeam): Palliative care teams will be established and will work with residents in the intervention nursing homes.
2,852
Standard Care
Usual care will be provided to residents in the control homes.
2,978
Total5,830

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyFacility closed0270
Overall StudyWithdrawal by facility4071,083

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPalliative Care Team (PCTeam)TotalStandard Care
Age, Continuous86.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
86.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
86.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants19 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2851 Participants5811 Participants2960 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
22 Participants44 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
11 Participants22 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
108 Participants261 Participants153 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2711 Participants5503 Participants2792 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2852 participants5830 participants2978 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1813 Participants3743 Participants1930 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1039 Participants2087 Participants1048 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2,852 / 2,8522,978 / 2,978
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2,8520 / 2,978
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2,852 / 2,8522,978 / 2,978

Outcome results

Primary

Hospital Site of Death: Number of Decedents Cared for in an Enrolled and Assigned NH Facility, Who Were Transferred to a Hospital and Died in the Hospital During the Study Period

This outcome measure, Hospital Site of Death, assesses whether death occured in a nursing home or in a hospital following transfer from the nursing home, among nursing home residents who were cared for in an enrolled facility.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Nursing home residents cared for in an assigned facility, who died during the study timeframe

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Palliative Care Team (PCTeam)Hospital Site of Death: Number of Decedents Cared for in an Enrolled and Assigned NH Facility, Who Were Transferred to a Hospital and Died in the Hospital During the Study Period579 Participants
Standard CareHospital Site of Death: Number of Decedents Cared for in an Enrolled and Assigned NH Facility, Who Were Transferred to a Hospital and Died in the Hospital During the Study Period441 Participants
p-value: >0.05MOnte carlo simulation
Secondary

Hospitalizations

Number of hospitalizations in the last 90 days of life among decedents being cared for in the enrolled nursing homes

Time frame: The last 90 days of life

Population: Decedents with data on hospitalizations in the last 90 days of life

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Palliative Care Team (PCTeam)Hospitalizations0.34 Mean number of hospitalizationsStandard Deviation 0.69
Standard CareHospitalizations0.29 Mean number of hospitalizationsStandard Deviation 0.62
p-value: >0.05Monte carlo simulation
Other Pre-specified

Number of Nursing Home Residents in Moderate-to-severe Pain

Presence of moderate-to-severe pain within 6 months of the date of death, among decedents cared for in the enrolled nursing homes. The verbal descriptor pain scale, where the resident is asked to rate the intensity of their worst pain in the last five day was most often used, where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain , 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain, 4 = very severe pain, and 9 = unable to answer. Lower numbers (0 or 1 ) on the scale are preferred, and a lower percentage of residents reporting pain intensity in the moderate or higher ranges is a better outcome. The verbal descriptor scale can be shared with elders verbally, as the name implies, or by asking the resident to point to a setting on a visual thermometer with these word choices.

Time frame: up to 6 months prior to death

Population: Decedents cared for in assigned nursing home facilities for whom data on pain was available

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Palliative Care Team (PCTeam)Number of Nursing Home Residents in Moderate-to-severe Pain235 Participants
Standard CareNumber of Nursing Home Residents in Moderate-to-severe Pain218 Participants
p-value: >0.05Monte carlo simulation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026