Skip to content

The Effect of Taking Break During Colonoscopy Session on Adenoma Detection, a Prospective, Randomized Control Study

The Effect of Taking Break During Colonoscopy Session on Adenoma Detection, a Prospective, Randomized Control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01989650
Enrollment
1379
Registered
2013-11-21
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2015-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonic Adenoma

Brief summary

Recent research has suggested that endoscopist fatigue may significantly affect the polyp detection rate. There have been no studies on interventions that may reduce endoscopist fatigue and therefore improve colonoscopy performance. We want to determine whether a break in the middle of colonoscopy session would maintain a more stable adenoma detection rate

Detailed description

In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the volume of endoscopic procedures performed in most endoscopy centers. With the growing awareness of colorectal cancer screening, there is increasing demand for colonoscopy which has increased the workload of endoscopists in every healthcare system. There are studies showing that physician fatigue impairs quality of care and performance in other medical specialties such as anesthesia and surgery. Colonoscopy by nature is repetitive and frequently prolonged which can promote distractibility and fatigability. Studies from western countries have showed that afternoon colonoscopies are associated with lower adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared with the morning colonoscopies and physician fatigue has been hypothesized as a potential contributor. Previous studies also showed that the polyp detection rate decreases hour-by-hour throughout the day and the colonoscopy completion rate appears to decline with successive procedures due to endoscopist fatigue. The most recent study using the queue position as a surrogate marker for endoscopist fatigue had showed that both the later colonoscopy start time and increasing number of preceding endoscopic procedures are associated with decreasing polyp detection rate. It is not surprising that endoscopist fatigue may contribute to a significant decline in the effectiveness of colonoscopy and yet it is probably not realistic to reduce the number of colonoscopy procedures per session given the heavy clinical demand. There have been no studies on any intervention that may improve the performance of colonoscopy. It would be reasonable to postulate that taking a break half way through the colonoscopy session may alleviate endoscopist fatigue and hence improve the polyp detection rate. This study aims to evaluate the effect of introducing a break in the middle of a colonoscopy session on the quality of colonoscopy performance.

Interventions

OTHERBreak

A break of 15 minute will be provided after 3rd colonoscopy in a session of 6 colonoscopies in total

OTHERNo break

No break will be provided

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients who underwent colonoscopies in the afternoon session at the endoscopy unit in AHNH were eligible for inclusion in this study.

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency inpatient colonoscopy * Patient with history of colorectal cancer , FAP or IBD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Adenoma detection rate2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cecal intubation rate2 years
Patient satisfaction score2 yearsA questionnaire will be used to asses patient's satisfaction level
Colonoscopy insertion time2 years
Withdrawal time2 years
Patient pain score2 yearsA questionnaire will be used to asses patient's level of pain
Complication rate2 years

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026