Skip to content

24 Week Efficacy and 3-year Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab in Autoinjectors, to Demonstrate Efficacy at 24 Weeks and to Assess the Long Term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy up to 3 Years in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01989468
Enrollment
414
Registered
2013-11-21
Start date
2014-04-10
Completion date
2018-03-28
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

Psoriatic arthritis, AIN457, PsA, ACR, CASPAR, PASDAS, secukinumab, autoinjector

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to provide 24 - 52 week efficacy, safety and tolerability data, and up to 3-year efficacy, safety and tolerability data in subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis despite current or previous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and/or previous anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALSecukinumab

Secukinumab 150 mg provided in a 1 mL autoinjector (1 autoinjector for 150 mg dose, 2 autoinjectors for 300 mg dose)

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Secukinumab placebo provided in 1 mL autoinjector

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) classified by ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria. * Rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies negative. * Diagnosis of active plaque psoriasis or nail changes consistent with psoriasis. * Inadequate control of symptoms with NSAID.

Exclusion criteria

* Chest X-ray or chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process. * Subjects taking high potency opioid analgesics. * Previous exposure to secukinumab or other biologic drug directly targeting interleukin-17 (IL-17) or IL-17 receptor. * Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments / medications. * Subjects who have ever received biologic immunomodulating agents except for those targeting TNFα. * Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Week 24A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria if she/he has at least 20% decrease in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 20% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Week 24DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity based on 28-Swollen and Tender Joint Count \[proximal interphalangeal joints (10 joints) metacarpophalangeal joints (10) wrists (2) elbows (2) shoulders (2) knees (2)\], CRP, and the Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity. Values range from 2.0 to 10.0 where higher values mean a higher disease activity. DAS28-CRP \< 2.6 is interpreted as remission.
Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Week 24PASI takes into account the extent of the disease, as well as the severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness in different body areas affected by psoriasis. A PASI75 represents an improvement in the PASI score of at least 75% as compared with baseline.
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Week 24SF-36 is a 36 item questionnaire which measures Quality of Life across eight domains, which are both physically and emotionally based. Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) can be computed. In this study, SF-36 PCS is used to assess improvement from baseline of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo. The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Week 24PASI takes into account the extent of the disease, as well as the severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness in different body areas affected by psoriasis. A PASI90 represents an improvement in the PASI score of at least 90% as compared with baseline.
Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Week 24A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR50 criteria if she/he has at least 50% decreases in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 50% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]
Proportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at BaselineWeek 24The presence of dactylitis was assessed by dactylitis count (number of fingers and toes with dactylitis, with a range of 0-20). If dactylitis is present with any finger or toe, the patient is counted as a patient with dactylitis.
Proportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at BaselineWeek 24The presence of Enthesitis was assessed using a validated enthesitis index that uses 6 sites for evaluation of enthesitis: lateral epicondyle humerus L + R, proximal achilles L + R and medial condyle femur. If enthesitis is present at any of the 6 sites, the subject is counted as a subject with enthesitis.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)From first dose of study treatment to last study visit, up to 3 yearsAnalysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by primary System Organ Class (SOC).
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Week 24The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. In this trial, only the disability dimension was used. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing 8 common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Within each of the 8 categories, only the item indicating the most severe impairment contributes to the category score. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Puerto Rico, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms (1:1:1) and planned to be treated for 156 weeks. Placebo non-responders had the option to be re-randomized at Week 16 and placebo responders had the option to be re-randomized at Week 24. Thus, of the 137 original placebo patients 64 were re-randomized to AIN457 150 mg and 65 to AIN457 300 mg.

Pre-assignment details

A screening period (SCR) running up to 10 weeks before randomization was used to assess eligibility.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AIN457 150 mg
1 s.c. Secukinumab 150 mg autoinjector at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4.
138
AIN457 300 mg
2 s.c. Secukinumab 150 mg autoinjector at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4.
139
Placebo
Matching Placebo at Beseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4.
137
Total414

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event1015454
Overall StudyDeath30100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1111742
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up52011
Overall StudyPhysician Decision41010
Overall StudyPregnancy01000
Overall StudySubject Guardian Decision116441
Overall StudyTechnical Problems31310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants16 Participants19 Participants47 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
126 Participants123 Participants118 Participants367 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
5 Participants6 Participants0 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
129 Participants130 Participants133 Participants392 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
77 Participants72 Participants78 Participants227 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants67 Participants59 Participants187 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 2020 / 2844 / 4060 / 137
other
Total, other adverse events
153 / 202201 / 284320 / 40665 / 137
serious
Total, serious adverse events
42 / 20235 / 28476 / 4069 / 137

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria if she/he has at least 20% decrease in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 20% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value, was considered.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AIN457 150 mgProportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2458 Participants
AIN457 300 mgProportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2467 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2422 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity based on 28-Swollen and Tender Joint Count \[proximal interphalangeal joints (10 joints) metacarpophalangeal joints (10) wrists (2) elbows (2) shoulders (2) knees (2)\], CRP, and the Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity. Values range from 2.0 to 10.0 where higher values mean a higher disease activity. DAS28-CRP \< 2.6 is interpreted as remission.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value, was considered.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AIN457 150 mgChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24-1.24 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
AIN457 300 mgChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24-1.56 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.093
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24-0.64 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.127
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. In this trial, only the disability dimension was used. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing 8 common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Within each of the 8 categories, only the item indicating the most severe impairment contributes to the category score. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value, was considered.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AIN457 150 mgChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24-0.27 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.043
AIN457 300 mgChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24-0.38 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.042
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24-0.17 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.055
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

SF-36 is a 36 item questionnaire which measures Quality of Life across eight domains, which are both physically and emotionally based. Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) can be computed. In this study, SF-36 PCS is used to assess improvement from baseline of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo. The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value, was considered.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AIN457 150 mgChange From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Mental Component Summary (MCS)1.68 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.837
AIN457 150 mgChange From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Physical Component Summary (PCS)3.42 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
AIN457 300 mgChange From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Mental Component Summary (MCS)4.41 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.822
AIN457 300 mgChange From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Physical Component Summary (PCS)6.46 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Mental Component Summary (MCS)-0.10 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 1.142
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24Physical Component Summary (PCS)2.94 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)

Analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by primary System Organ Class (SOC).

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to last study visit, up to 3 years

Population: Safety Set, based on Final Analysis. All subjects who took at least one dose of study treatment during the treatment period. A subject with multiple adverse events within a primary system organ class was counted only once in the total row. Deaths up to 28 days after the last dose are included. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AIN457 150 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)AEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)176 Participants
AIN457 150 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)SAEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)42 Participants
AIN457 150 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)4 Participants
AIN457 300 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)AEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)230 Participants
AIN457 300 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)SAEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)35 Participants
AIN457 300 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)AEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)363 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)SAEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)76 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)AEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)81 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)SAEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

PASI takes into account the extent of the disease, as well as the severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness in different body areas affected by psoriasis. A PASI90 represents an improvement in the PASI score of at least 90% as compared with baseline.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value, was considered.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AIN457 150 mgPercentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2425 Participants
AIN457 300 mgPercentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2421 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 244 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR50 criteria if she/he has at least 50% decreases in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 50% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value, was considered.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AIN457 150 mgProportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2426 Participants
AIN457 300 mgProportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2448 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2412 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline

The presence of dactylitis was assessed by dactylitis count (number of fingers and toes with dactylitis, with a range of 0-20). If dactylitis is present with any finger or toe, the patient is counted as a patient with dactylitis.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Dactylitis subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value at Baseline and post-basline, was considered.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AIN457 150 mgProportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline22 Participants
AIN457 300 mgProportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline24 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline31 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline

The presence of Enthesitis was assessed using a validated enthesitis index that uses 6 sites for evaluation of enthesitis: lateral epicondyle humerus L + R, proximal achilles L + R and medial condyle femur. If enthesitis is present at any of the 6 sites, the subject is counted as a subject with enthesitis.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Enthesitis subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value at Baseline and post-basline, was considered.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AIN457 150 mgProportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline60 Participants
AIN457 300 mgProportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline53 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline83 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

PASI takes into account the extent of the disease, as well as the severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness in different body areas affected by psoriasis. A PASI75 represents an improvement in the PASI score of at least 75% as compared with baseline.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis, which consisted of all participants with an observed value, was considered.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AIN457 150 mgProportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2434 Participants
AIN457 300 mgProportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2429 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 246 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026