Skip to content

NoAL (HPMC) in Combination With Oxymetazoline in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis

Stage 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Groups, One Centre Study in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Treated With Nasal Oxymetazoline in Combination With Nasal Hydroxyl-propyl-methyl Cellulose (HPMC) or Placebo

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01986582
Acronym
NOPAR
Enrollment
40
Registered
2013-11-18
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2015-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Allergic Rhinitis, Congestion, Mucoadhesive Treatment, Nasal Decongestant

Brief summary

Allergic rhinitis is treated with a variety of systemic and locally applied drugs. The effectiveness of the intranasally applied formulations is diminished by the cleaning mechanisms of the nose, rhinorrhea in particular. Slowing down of the clearance of the nasal mucosa and prolonging the contact time of locally applied drugs with the nasal mucosa would improve their efficacy. One method is creating dosage forms containing mucoadhesive polymers. We have demonstrated that a mucoadhesive solution containing HPMC enhances the clinical efficacy of oxymetazoline. However, the industrial development of fixed combinations of pharmaceutical compound and mucoadhesive carrier requires substantial investments, escalating manifold if different pharmaceutical compounds have to be rendered mucoadhesive. NoAl is a cellulose derivative powder, which forms a gel layer on contact with the mucosal surface of the nose blocking the contact of the pollen grains with the nasal mucosa in seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, there is another potential benefit of applying NoAl (HPMC) along with other commercially available drugs for local treatment of rhinitis, as the formation of a gel layer can substantially delay their clearance from the nose and thus increase their effectiveness. This hypothesis needs to be substantiated clinically.

Detailed description

The main objective of the trial is to test the synergy between HPMC and oxymetazoline (both applied nasally) on the increase of peak nasal inspiratory flow in patients suffering from moderately severe / severe persistent allergic rhinitis. The design of the trial is parallel-groups, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, single centre study. Forty patients are randomly assigned to receive either oxymetazoline followed by HPMC (Group A) or oxymetazoline followed by placebo (Group B). Each patient is followed up for 15 days. Day 1 is the screening and inclusion visit. Data will then be collected on day 8 & 15. Patients will fill in diaries their everyday symptoms, adverse events and applied medications.

Interventions

Intranasal application

OTHERHydroxyl-propyl-methyl cellulose powder

Intranasal application

OTHERPlacebo (lactose powder)

Intranasal application

Sponsors

Nasaleze
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Association Asthma, Bulgaria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients * Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 50 years * Moderately severe / severe persistent allergic rhinitis * Positive skin prick test for perennial aero-allergens * Active symptoms with prominent congestion at the time of inclusion

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with pollen sensitization during the respective pollen season * Subjects with arterial hypertension, arrhythmia or evidence of heart ischemia * Subjects with other serious chronic comorbidities and bad therapeutic control * Subjects with nasal polyposis * Flu-like episode during the past 30 days * Subjects unable to give informed consent * Subjects with any of the contra-indications of oxymetazoline or NoAL * Pregnant or lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) area under the curve (AUC) change between the placebo and active NoAl treatment on day 1PNIF on Day 1, 8 and 15

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Differences in nasal mucociliary clearance (Saccharine test) between both groups.Performed on D1, D8 and D15
Visual analogue scale (VAS) for the separate rhinitis symptoms between the two groupsOn D1, D8 and D15
Change of each symptom score for congestion over 8 daysFrom D1 to D8
Difference between the PNIF AUC D1-D8 differences between the two groupsPNIF on D1 and D8
Difference in the applied rescue decongestant (total number of additional puffs of oxymetazoline or any other medications indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis) as needed between the two groupsFor 15 days
Number and severity of adverse events15 days
Change of total rhinitis symptom score (TRSS) over 8 daysFrom D1 to D8

Countries

Bulgaria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026