Skip to content

A Trial of Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Treating Low Rectal Cancer

A Single-centre, Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, Unblinded, Parallel-group Trial of Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for the Curative Treatment of Low Rectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01985698
Acronym
RLAPR
Enrollment
347
Registered
2013-11-15
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Keywords

Low rectal cancer, Robotic, Laparoscopic, Abdominoperineal resection

Brief summary

In this study, the investigators assessed the difference in efficacy and safety among robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for patients with low rectal cancer.

Detailed description

Patients will be eligible for inclusion if their primary tumors is low rectal cancer. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to robotic-assisted (arm A) versus laparoscopic (arm B) abdominoperineal resection.

Interventions

PROCEDURERobotic-assisted resection.

Robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection.

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection

Sponsors

Fudan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma * Inferior edge of the tumor located within 5 cm from the anal verge as determined by colonoscopy withdrawing and digital rectal examination * No evidence of distant metastases (including pelvis, peritoneum, liver, lung, brain, bone, distant lymph node, etc) according to ultrasound, CT, PET-CT, etc * Tumor assessed as cT1-T3 or ycT1-T3 after preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy by pelvic MRI * No other malignancies in medical history except adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri * Suitable for both robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I - III * No other preoperative treatment except neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Tumors assessed as cT1N0 and suitable for local excision * Signs of acute intestinal obstruction, bleeding or perforation needing emergency surgery * More than one colorectal tumor * Familial Adenomatosis Polyposis, Lynch Syndrome, acute inflammatory bowel disease * Schedules need for other synchronous colon surgery * Absolute contraindications to general anesthesia or prolonged pneumoperitoneum (ASA class \> III) * Pregnancy or lactation * Patients and/or family members can not understand and accept this study * Patients received chemoradiotherapy or other anti-tumor therapy before surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative complications30 days post operativelypostoperative complications related to operation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
operative mortality30 days post operativelydeath occurred 30 days after operation
disease-free survival3 yearsdisease-free survival rate at 3 years after operation
overall survival3 and 5 yearsoverall survival rate at 3 and 5 years after operation
locoregional recurrence rate3 and 5 yearslocal recurrence rate at 3 and 5 years after operation

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of retrieved lymph nodes10 days post operativelyIt will be reported according to the post-operative pathology.
postoperative hospital stay30 days post operativelyThe postoperative hospital stay is defined as the number of date from the first day after operation to discharge.
operative timeDay 1Time from cutting the skin to suturing the incision during the surgery, recorded in minute
self reported sexual function for male patientsat postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 monthsThis section is assessed using a self-rating scale International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5).
self reported sexual function for female patientsat postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 monthsThis section is assessed using a self-rating scale Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).
self reported bladder functionat postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 monthsThis section is assessed using a self-rating scale International prostate symptom score (IPSS)
rate of conversion to open surgeryDay 1The rate of patients actually receiving open surgery in robotic or laparoscopic surgery groups.
estimated blood lossDay 1Blood loss will be measured according to the suction and the weight of wet gauze, and then minus the irrigation.
circumferential resection margin10 days post operativelyThe circumferential margin will be reported as positive or negative to define whether tumor is radically resected. It will be reported according to the post-operative pathology. Details are based on NCCN and Chinese guidelines for colorectal cancer.
proximal/distal resection margin10 days post operativelyThe proximal/distal resection margin will be reported as positive or negative to define whether tumor is radically resected. It will be reported according to the post-operative pathology. Details are based on NCCN and Chinese guidelines for colorectal cancer.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026