Skip to content

The Effects of Immunotherapy in the Nose

The Molecular Biological Effects of Immunotherapy in the Nose

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01985542
Acronym
Birch11
Enrollment
16
Registered
2013-11-15
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2021-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

Brief summary

Allergic rhinitis might be caused by decreased resistance of nasal barrier to allergens and other environmental insults. About 20 % of the European population suffers from pollen allergies. Birch pollen allergic rhinitis is the most common allergic disease in the Scandinavia and it exists widely also in the Central Europe. Suffering and high costs of pollen allergies may be reduced by understanding the molecular biology of the nasal barriers during allergic response. Our aim is to observe the effect of season and birch pollen immunotherapy on the molecular biology of nasal epithelium and the microbiome.

Detailed description

This is a controlled study with an intervention arm, and a control group of healthy volunteers. The population is composed of nonsmoking healthy adults and patients having birch or timothy pollen allergy with rhinoconjuctivitis symptoms and without other diseases. The diagnosis of pollen allergy is verified with positive history, skin prick test, and allergen specific IgE antibodies. Subjects undergo a spirometry with a bronchodilatator test and a histamine challenge. Quality of life and patient history data is collected by questionnaires. Four peripheral blood samples, as well as nasal cell swabs from nasal mucosa without local anesthesia are collected from each patient; in spring and winter before the group of the intervention arm starts with birch pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy; and during the first spring and winter when a subgroups has received the birch pollen immunotherapy. We plan to perform the following analyses for the nasal specimens: transcriptomics and their regulators, sequencing of 16SrRNA and RT-qPCR for assessing mucosal microbiome, mass spectrometry for analyses of proteins and protein-protein complexes, immunohistochemistry for tissue level localization and quantitation of proteins, in silico analyses for the data mining, integration and display. In addition we observe the alterations in inflammatory mediators after in vitro allergen activation of purified peripheral blood leukocytes by ELISA and real time qPCR.

Interventions

DRUGbirch pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy

birch pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy

Sponsors

University of Helsinki
CollaboratorOTHER
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* allergic rhinoconjunctivitis of birch pollen OR healthy controls

Exclusion criteria

* smoking, asthma, any other disease than allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, requiring constant medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Total Number of Differentially Expressed Transcripts.-6 months vs. +6 months from the starting point of birch pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy.Transcriptomics are evaluated By Next Generation Sequencing. The total number of differentially expressed transcripts are defined from nasal epithelial brushing samples taken at -6 months vs. at +6 months in the two subject groups. The subject groups are the Subcutaneous immunotherapy group and No immunotherapy group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Visual Analogue Scale Scores of Symptoms-6 months vs. +6 months from the starting point of birch pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy.Visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as 0-100 mm per each symptom question. VAS value 0 (mm) indicates no symptoms, and value 100 (mm) indicates the worst case. Total VAS score = sum of the VAS scores for the 41 symptoms The minimum value of the total VAS score is 0, and the maximum value is 4100. Relative change = \[(measure at time +6 months - measure at time -6 months)\]/measure at time -6 months \* 100%. Measure = total VAS score

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subcutaneous Immunotherapy
Starting with subcutaneuous birch pollen immunotherapy with normal protocol of the Hospital
3
no Immunotherapy
Birch pollen allergic subjects that are not starting with immunotherapy
3
Total6

Baseline characteristics

Characteristicno ImmunotherapySubcutaneous ImmunotherapyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Age, Continuous34 years40 years38.5 years
Region of Enrollment
Finland
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

The Total Number of Differentially Expressed Transcripts.

Transcriptomics are evaluated By Next Generation Sequencing. The total number of differentially expressed transcripts are defined from nasal epithelial brushing samples taken at -6 months vs. at +6 months in the two subject groups. The subject groups are the Subcutaneous immunotherapy group and No immunotherapy group.

Time frame: -6 months vs. +6 months from the starting point of birch pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Subcutaneous ImmunotherapyThe Total Number of Differentially Expressed Transcripts.119 transcripts
No ImmunotherapyThe Total Number of Differentially Expressed Transcripts.49 transcripts
Secondary

Percentage Change in Visual Analogue Scale Scores of Symptoms

Visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as 0-100 mm per each symptom question. VAS value 0 (mm) indicates no symptoms, and value 100 (mm) indicates the worst case. Total VAS score = sum of the VAS scores for the 41 symptoms The minimum value of the total VAS score is 0, and the maximum value is 4100. Relative change = \[(measure at time +6 months - measure at time -6 months)\]/measure at time -6 months \* 100%. Measure = total VAS score

Time frame: -6 months vs. +6 months from the starting point of birch pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Population: The subject groups are the Subcutaneous immunotherapy group and No immunotherapy group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Subcutaneous ImmunotherapyPercentage Change in Visual Analogue Scale Scores of Symptoms-68 percent change
No ImmunotherapyPercentage Change in Visual Analogue Scale Scores of Symptoms91 percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026