Skip to content

Evaluation of 3 Different Doses of IV Busulfan

Prospective and Multicentre Evaluation of 3 Different Doses of IV Busulfan Associated With Fludarabine and Thymoglobuline in the Conditioning of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) From a Matched Related or Unrelated Donor in Patients With Poor Prognosis Myeloid Malignancies

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01985061
Acronym
AAA
Enrollment
177
Registered
2013-11-15
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2026-07-07
Last updated
2025-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Keywords

Myelodysplasic syndrome, Acute Myeloid leukemia

Brief summary

Albeit the safety of the stem cell transplantation procedure has been greatly improved, further refining the intensity of the conditioning is an important issue to explore, especially in patients with poor prognosis, the goal being to maintain the very favorable safety profile and improve the disease control. This is the goal our prospective trial; we aim to prospectively evaluate in a prospective multicenter trial the efficacy of different conditioning regimens in patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies. The study is a phase II trial randomizing patients between a prospective active control arm (BX2) and two experimental arms (BX3 and BX4). A standard group was kept in this clinical trial in order to avoid the limitations induced by the comparison with historical controls in the context of continuously improving practice. Each experimental arm will be conducted in parallel according to a standard phase II trial design. In addition, this trial will associate four ancillary studies to the main clinical objective: 1/ a prospective assessment of the quality of life of the patients over a period of 2 years 2/ an analysis of the cost effectiveness of the procedure, assessed over a period of 2 years 3/ an observational busulfan pharmacokinetic study 4/ a busulfan pharmacogenomic study

Interventions

DRUGBX2
DRUGBX3
DRUGBX4-Suspended

Suspended

Sponsors

Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with poor prognosis myeloid malignancies: * Myelodysplastic syndrome, * Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) beyond Complete Response (CR1), * CR1 AML with poor risk cytogenetics 2. Adult patients: aged ≥ 55 years up to 65 or \< 55 years not eligible for myeloablative conditioning regimen based on Total Body Irradiation (TBI) or double alkylating agent combinations. 3. Availability of a HLA identical sibling or matched unrelated donor (10/10) 4. Affiliation to social security 5. Written Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

1. History of previous Allo-Hematological Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) 2. HIV positivity 3. Signs of chronic active hepatitis B and/or C 4. Evolutive psychiatric disease 5. Concomitant neoplastic disease 6. Pregnant or lactating woman or without contraception (for child bearing potential wom-en) 7. Usual contra-indications for Allo-HSCT

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to progression or deathup to 2 years2-year progression free survival rates

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to neutrophil>0.5G/l and platelets>50G/lup to 2 monthshematologic recovery
Graft versus host diseaseup to 2 years
relapseup to 2 years
Occurrence of grade 3-4 adverse events according the CTC-AE v4.0 scaleup to 6 monthssafety

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026