Skip to content

CAndesartan vs LIsinopril Effects on the BRain

CAndesartan vs LIsinopril Effects on the BRain and Endothelial Function in eXecutive MCI (CALIBREX)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01984164
Acronym
CALIBREX
Enrollment
176
Registered
2013-11-14
Start date
2014-08-20
Completion date
2018-12-03
Last updated
2021-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Cerebrovascular function

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to conduct a 1-year double blind randomized control trial comparing candesartan to lisinopril in 140 individuals with hypertension and executive mild cognitive impairment in their effects on executive function, neuroimaging markers, and vascular indicators.

Detailed description

* Hypertension is associated with cognitive impairment even in the absence of clinical dementia. To date, no specific treatment is available for this pattern of mild cognitive impairment related to hypertension. * Objectives or purpose: The aims of this study are to investigate the effects of candesartan on executive function decline and on changes in cerebral perfusion, cerebrovascular reserve and microvascular brain injury. The study also intends to identify potential underlying mechanisms related to vascular structure and function, including atherosclerosis, vascular inflammation, vascular stiffness, and endothelial progenitor cells, by which candesartan may affect the cognitive and cerebrovascular outcomes. * Study methodology:This is a double blind randomized clinical trial that will be conducted in 140 individuals (70 in the candesartan group, 70 in the lisinopril group). Our target population is subjects: 55 years or older with hypertension and Executive Mild Cognitive Impairment. * Endpoints to be measured:Our measures include cognitive function, cerebral perfusion and reserve, markers of vascular brain damage, atherosclerosis, stiffness, vascular inflammation and endothelial function. * Description of intervention, follow-up, and duration of study: Eligible participants will undergo randomization into 2 groups and will be seen frequently until their blood pressure is controlled (\<140/90 mmHg). Participants will be seen at 3, 6 and 12 months afterwards.

Interventions

DRUGCandesartan

blinded

DRUGLisinopril

Blinded

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age: 55 years or older; 2. Hypertension: SBP≥140 mm Hg or DBP≥ 90 mm or receiving antihypertensive medications. 3. Executive MCI will be defined using these criteria: 1. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score less than or equal to 26 2. Executive dysfunction: A performance at the 10th percentile or below on at least one of four screening tests for executive function: Trail Making Test, Part B (TMT-B), modified Stroop interference, Digit Span and Digit Sequencing, and Letter fluency. 3. Minimal Functional limitation as reflected by the Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ)≤7

Exclusion criteria

1. Intolerance to study drugs; 2. SBP \>200 or DBP \>110 mm Hg; 3. Renal disease or hyperkalemia 4. Active medical or psychiatric problems 5. Uncontrolled congestive heart failure; 6. History of stroke in the past 3 years; 7. Inability to perform the study procedures 8. Women of childbearing potential 9. diagnosis of dementia 10. In those who lack decision capacity, a study surrogate who can sign on their behalf will be required. Since we are enrolling only those with MCI, we anticipate that most participants will have decision capacity 11. Current use of Lithium, as most antihypertensive classes may lead to increased lithium toxic levels.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Executive Function12 monthsExecutive function will be assessed using Trail Making Test (part B-A). Part A was collected to correct for motor speed and visual-perceptual demands on TMT by subtracting completion time for TMT Part A from completion time for Part B (TMT B - A). TMT Part B-A provides a relatively purer measure of executive functioning. It has a timed scale from 0 sec (min) to 300 secs (max). Along this scale, a lower score is better.
NINDS-initiated EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER Tool Box.12 monthsEXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER tool box. This test batteryThe battery includes 11 tasks that generate 15 primary variables. Within this set, the EXAMINER includes: working memory, inhibition, set shifting, and fluency. The parts of EXAMINER that were used for this study include: Flanker task (inhibition) which involves responding to a central stimulus while ignoring flanking stimuli that are either compatible or incompatible with the central stimulus; Set-shifting, a measure of mental flexibility; Spatial 1-Back test assesses spatial working memory; Dot Counting test assesses verbal working memory; Verbal Fluency tested using a List Generation test which require the participant to generate words beginning with a specific letter, and category fluency in which the participant generates words from a specified category (e.g., animals, fruits). Higher are reflective of better executive function (-1 to +1)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attention Measured Using Digit Span Backward12 monthsThe Digit Span test is a subtest of both the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS). For the digit span backwards, subjects are read a sequence of numbers and asked to repeat the same sequence back to the examiner in reverse order (backward span). Backward span is an executive task particularly dependent on working memory. The Digit Span backward is scored for backwards performance. Scale: 0 (minimum) to 16 (maximum). A higher score represents a better outcome.
White Matter Lesion Volume12 monthsWhite Matter Lesion volume: high-resolution anatomical images are acquired for the measurement of microvascular disease. WMH volumes will be obtained from Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging sequence and reported as total volume (in mm3). Higher values means greater WMH
Memory12 monthsTo assess episodic memory, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) will be used. The retention (%) score is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of 3 learning trials. Each trial scores 0 (min) to 12 (max). The HVLT-R retention score is a percentage, and a higher percentage represents a better outcome.
Attention Measured Using Digit Span Forward12 monthsThis will be measured using Digit Span Forward. The Digit Span test is a subtest of both the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS). For the digit span forward, subjects are read a sequence of numbers and asked to repeat the same sequence back to the examiner in the correct order (forward span). Forward span captures attention efficiency and capacity. The Digit Span forward is scored for forwards performance. Scale: 0 (minimum) to 16 (maximum). A higher score represents a better outcome.
Cerebral Perfusion12 monthsASL-MRI: Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI is non-invasive measure of perfusion that does not require contrast, and allows multiple brain regions mapping of perfusion and reserve. ASL-MRI provides measures of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Higher values indicates higher CBF.
Language12 monthsThis will be measured using the Boston Naming Test. BNT is a neuropsychological test used to assess visual confrontation naming and language performance in participants with cognitive decline. Its short 15-item version consists of drawings of objects ranging from common objects to less familiar objects. Scale: 0 (min score) to 15 (max score). For this test, a higher score/response represents a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Candesartan
To achieve blood pressure control, we will use a stepwise protocol as follows: candesartan (blinded) 8mg→ 16mg→ 32mg. Both groups will also receive (unblinded) , if needed to achieve blood pressure control, HCTZ 12.5mg→ 25mg, Amlodipine 2.5mg→ 5mg →10mg and metoprolol succinate extended release 12.5mg→ 25mg→ 50mg. Antihypertensive medications will be increased every 2 weeks until control is achieved. Candesartan: blinded
87
Lisinopril
To achieve blood pressure control we will use a stepwise protocol as follows: lisinopril (blinded) 10mg→ 20mg→ 40mg. Both groups will also receive (unblinded), if needed to achieve blood pressure control, HCTZ 12.5mg→ 25mg, Amlodipine 2.5mg→ 5mg→ 10mg and metoprolol succinate extended release 12.5mg→ 25mg→ 50mg. Antihypertensive medications will be increased every 2 weeks until control is achieved. Lisinopril: Blinded
89
Total176

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event519
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCandesartanLisinoprilTotal
Age, Continuous66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
MoCA score21.4 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
21.7 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
21.5 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
56 Participants57 Participants113 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants31 Participants60 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
87 participants89 participants176 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants54 Participants101 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants35 Participants75 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 870 / 89
other
Total, other adverse events
87 / 8789 / 89
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 870 / 89

Outcome results

Primary

Executive Function

Executive function will be assessed using Trail Making Test (part B-A). Part A was collected to correct for motor speed and visual-perceptual demands on TMT by subtracting completion time for TMT Part A from completion time for Part B (TMT B - A). TMT Part B-A provides a relatively purer measure of executive functioning. It has a timed scale from 0 sec (min) to 300 secs (max). Along this scale, a lower score is better.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CandesartanExecutive Function87.23 secondsStandard Error 5.46
LisinoprilExecutive Function111.37 secondsStandard Error 5.89
Comparison: All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat principle. Results are provided as adjusted least-square means with SE and effect size (ES) estimates (calculated from mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) as the adjusted difference in cognitive change between the 2 groups over the study period).95% CI: [-23.6, -3.7]
Primary

NINDS-initiated EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER Tool Box.

EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER tool box. This test batteryThe battery includes 11 tasks that generate 15 primary variables. Within this set, the EXAMINER includes: working memory, inhibition, set shifting, and fluency. The parts of EXAMINER that were used for this study include: Flanker task (inhibition) which involves responding to a central stimulus while ignoring flanking stimuli that are either compatible or incompatible with the central stimulus; Set-shifting, a measure of mental flexibility; Spatial 1-Back test assesses spatial working memory; Dot Counting test assesses verbal working memory; Verbal Fluency tested using a List Generation test which require the participant to generate words beginning with a specific letter, and category fluency in which the participant generates words from a specified category (e.g., animals, fruits). Higher are reflective of better executive function (-1 to +1)

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CandesartanNINDS-initiated EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER Tool Box.0.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
LisinoprilNINDS-initiated EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER Tool Box.0.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Secondary

Attention Measured Using Digit Span Backward

The Digit Span test is a subtest of both the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS). For the digit span backwards, subjects are read a sequence of numbers and asked to repeat the same sequence back to the examiner in reverse order (backward span). Backward span is an executive task particularly dependent on working memory. The Digit Span backward is scored for backwards performance. Scale: 0 (minimum) to 16 (maximum). A higher score represents a better outcome.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CandesartanAttention Measured Using Digit Span Backward5.14 Number of correct responsesStandard Error 0.25
LisinoprilAttention Measured Using Digit Span Backward5.16 Number of correct responsesStandard Error 0.26
Secondary

Attention Measured Using Digit Span Forward

This will be measured using Digit Span Forward. The Digit Span test is a subtest of both the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS). For the digit span forward, subjects are read a sequence of numbers and asked to repeat the same sequence back to the examiner in the correct order (forward span). Forward span captures attention efficiency and capacity. The Digit Span forward is scored for forwards performance. Scale: 0 (minimum) to 16 (maximum). A higher score represents a better outcome.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CandesartanAttention Measured Using Digit Span Forward9.67 Number of correct responsesStandard Error 0.61
LisinoprilAttention Measured Using Digit Span Forward8.93 Number of correct responsesStandard Error 0.66
Secondary

Cerebral Perfusion

ASL-MRI: Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI is non-invasive measure of perfusion that does not require contrast, and allows multiple brain regions mapping of perfusion and reserve. ASL-MRI provides measures of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Higher values indicates higher CBF.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Of 176 randomized participants, 27 did not complete an MRI scan at baseline (15 had metal implants with either pacemaker, stent, or inferior vena cava filter and 12 were claustrophobic). Of 141 participants who returned for their 12-month visit, an additional 8 participants refused to have a follow-up MRI. The final sample with both baseline and 12-month MRI was 104 participants (73.8%), including 51 participants in the candesartan group and 53 participants in the lisinopril group.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CandesartanCerebral Perfusion45.48 ml/100g/minStandard Error 1.47
LisinoprilCerebral Perfusion47.65 ml/100g/minStandard Error 1.08
Secondary

Language

This will be measured using the Boston Naming Test. BNT is a neuropsychological test used to assess visual confrontation naming and language performance in participants with cognitive decline. Its short 15-item version consists of drawings of objects ranging from common objects to less familiar objects. Scale: 0 (min score) to 15 (max score). For this test, a higher score/response represents a better outcome.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CandesartanLanguage13.42 number of correct responsesStandard Error 0.18
LisinoprilLanguage13.84 number of correct responsesStandard Error 0.18
Secondary

Memory

To assess episodic memory, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) will be used. The retention (%) score is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of 3 learning trials. Each trial scores 0 (min) to 12 (max). The HVLT-R retention score is a percentage, and a higher percentage represents a better outcome.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CandesartanMemory82.71 percentage of retentionStandard Error 3.26
LisinoprilMemory79.47 percentage of retentionStandard Error 3.39
Secondary

White Matter Lesion Volume

White Matter Lesion volume: high-resolution anatomical images are acquired for the measurement of microvascular disease. WMH volumes will be obtained from Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging sequence and reported as total volume (in mm3). Higher values means greater WMH

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Of 176 randomized participants, 27 did not complete an MRI scan at baseline (15 had metal implants with either pacemaker, stent, or inferior vena cava filter and 12 were claustrophobic). Of 141 participants who returned for their 12-month visit, an additional 8 participants refused to have a follow-up MRI. The final sample with both baseline and 12-month MRI was 104 participants (73.8%), including 51 participants in the candesartan group and 53 participants in the lisinopril group.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CandesartanWhite Matter Lesion Volume2.68 mm^3Standard Error 1.23
LisinoprilWhite Matter Lesion Volume5.73 mm^3Standard Error 1.22

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026