Skip to content

Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Norspan to Tramadol/Acetaminophen With Prolonged Postoperative Pain (PASSION)

A Multicenter, Phase IV, Interventional Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of NORSPAN to Tramadol/Acetaminophen in Patients With Prolonged Postoperative Pain After Spinal Surgery (PASSION)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01983111
Enrollment
136
Registered
2013-11-13
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2016-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine transdermal system to tramadol/acetaminophen.

Interventions

DRUGbuprenorphine

Dosage and administration: This one patch should be attached every 7 days.

Amount of drug ingredients : Acetaminophen 325 mg and Tramadol hydrochloride 37.5 mg in 1 tablet of this drug. Dosage and administration: Adjust dose depending on a patient's pain severity and treatment response. Starting at the initial dose of 2 tablets, usually administer 4 tablets per dose, twice daily. At a dosing interval of at least 12 hr, the daily dose should not exceed 8 tablets.

Sponsors

Mundipharma Korea Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Korean men and women aged 20 years or more * Presence of pain associated with a spinal disease and lumbar fusion at 1-2 spinal segments (1-2 level lumbar fusion surgery) * Moderate to severe pain of the NRS pain score ≥ 4 at Visit 1 (14\ 90 days after surgery, Baseline) (Amended 21Nov2013) * Consent to participate in the study and voluntary signature on the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Women of childbearing potential, except for the following cases: * A partner who is vasectomized or otherwise surgically sterile. * Use of 2 contraception methods. Two methods include the combination of double-barrier contraception or barrier contraception and hormone contraception, and appropriate barrier methods are as follows: Diaphragm (female contraceptive device), condom, intrauterine (copper or hormone), sponge or spermicide. Hormonal contraceptives include all commercially available products containing estrogen and/or progesterone. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Pregnant woman is defined as a woman after fertilization to late pregnancy with a positive result from the urine pregnancy test. * History of hypersensitivity to buprenorphine, tramadol, APAP or excipients, and celecoxib * Medical history of asthma, acute rhinitis, nasal polyp, vascular edema urticaria or allergic reaction to aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs, COX-2) * Hypersensitivity or intolerance to Domperidone * Risk of gastrointestinal irritation such as gastrointestinal bleeding, mechanical ileus or perforation * Genetic problem such as galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption * Severely impaired respiratory function or respiratory depression * Current use of monoamine oxidase(MAO) inhibitors or the medication history within 2 weeks prior to study participation * Convulsive disorder, head injury, shock, decreased level of consciousness of uncertain origin, intracranial lesion or increased intracranial pressure or severe hepatic impairment * Biliary tract disorder * Presence or suspected drug abuse history * Medical history of opioid or drug dependence * Current use of other CNS inhibitors or muscle relaxants that may result in dyspnea, hypotension, severe sedation or coma when used with the investigational product, opioid analgesics * Use of strong opioids, buprenorphine or tramadol/APAP within 1 week prior to study participation (however, study participation is allowed for PRN prescription of PCA and strong opioids) * Any condition representing a contraindication of application of buprenorphine, tramadol/APAP or celecoxib * Major pain not attributable to a spinal disease * Anticancer therapy that may affect pain assessment * Clinically significant cardiovascular or renal dysfunction * Postoperative complications * Symptoms of acute pain after lumbar fusion or characteristic analgesic features showing rapidly changing needs for analgesics * Current use of other investigational product at enrollment or within 30 days after administration of other investigational product

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to 6weeks After Treatment.baseline and 6 weeksNRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week6/ET minus mean score at Baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 2 of the Investigational Product Administration2 weeksNRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 2/ET minus mean score at Baseline.
Change in the Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Score From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 Post-doseBaseline and at 6 weeksEQ-5D to measure of health related quality of life should be answered as one of 3 levels about current condition for 5 dimensions for 'Motor capability', 'Self-care', 'Daily activities', 'Pain/discomfort', 'Depression/anxiety' and was calculated total average by giving a weighting on 3 level of answers (EQ-5D levels into 'no problems' (level 1) and 'problems' (level 2 and 3)). \*EQ-5D Total = 1 - 0.081 - (the score of the each level) - 0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents) EQ-5D total score could be 0.919 in maximum and -0.594 in minimum if case all index indicates the level 3. So, if EQ-5D total score closed by 1 means that the healthy condition and high quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)Baseline and at 6weeksThe EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (score = 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score = 0). Higher points were positive results and positive points of difference gap means improvement results.
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)6 weeksThe number of patients who choose the best opinion of overall satisfaction among Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale(CGIC) among 7 point scale. Missing data was imputed by LOCF. Scores measure from 1: Very much improved to 7:very much worse.
Patient Global Impressions of Change(PGIC)6 weeksIn the PP set, Number of participants with categorical change in overall satisfaction. PGIC: a participant-rated instrument assessing change in participant's overall satisfaction from baseline, on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Buprenorphine
Patch buprenorphine: Dosage and administration: This one patch should be attached every 7 days.
69
Tramadol/Acetaminophen
Oral tablet tramadol/acetaminophen: Amount of drug ingredients : Acetaminophen 325 mg and Tramadol hydrochloride 37.5 mg in 1 tablet of this drug. Dosage and administration: Adjust dose depending on a patient's pain severity and treatment response. Starting at the initial dose of 2 tablets, usually administer 4 tablets per dose, twice daily. At a dosing interval of at least 12 hr, the daily dose should not exceed 8 tablets.
65
Total134

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event40
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject86

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBuprenorphineTramadol/AcetaminophenTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
43 Participants27 Participants70 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants38 Participants64 Participants
Age, Continuous64.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.84
61.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.96
63.02 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.04
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants29 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants36 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 6913 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 690 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to 6weeks After Treatment.

NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week6/ET minus mean score at Baseline.

Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks

Population: In the PP set, the change in the pain intensity score from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 of the investigational product administration was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BuprenorphineChange in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to 6weeks After Treatment.-2.32 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Tramadol/AcetaminophenChange in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to 6weeks After Treatment.-2.75 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Comparison: In the Per protocol setp-value: 0.265897.5% CI: [-6, 3]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)

The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (score = 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score = 0). Higher points were positive results and positive points of difference gap means improvement results.

Time frame: Baseline and at 6weeks

Population: In the PP set, the change in the your today health score from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 of the investigational product administration was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BuprenorphineChange From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)14.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.34
Tramadol/AcetaminophenChange From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)9.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.63
Secondary

Change in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 2 of the Investigational Product Administration

NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 2/ET minus mean score at Baseline.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: In the PP set, the reduction in the pain intensity score from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 2 of the investigational product administration was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BuprenorphineChange in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 2 of the Investigational Product Administration-1.19 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
Tramadol/AcetaminophenChange in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 2 of the Investigational Product Administration-1.70 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Secondary

Change in the Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Score From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 Post-dose

EQ-5D to measure of health related quality of life should be answered as one of 3 levels about current condition for 5 dimensions for 'Motor capability', 'Self-care', 'Daily activities', 'Pain/discomfort', 'Depression/anxiety' and was calculated total average by giving a weighting on 3 level of answers (EQ-5D levels into 'no problems' (level 1) and 'problems' (level 2 and 3)). \*EQ-5D Total = 1 - 0.081 - (the score of the each level) - 0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents) EQ-5D total score could be 0.919 in maximum and -0.594 in minimum if case all index indicates the level 3. So, if EQ-5D total score closed by 1 means that the healthy condition and high quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and at 6 weeks

Population: In the PP set, the change in the quality of life (EQ-5D) total score from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 of the investigational product administration was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BuprenorphineChange in the Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Score From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 Post-dose0.09 EQ-5D Total scoreStandard Deviation 0.19
Tramadol/AcetaminophenChange in the Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Score From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 Post-dose0.21 EQ-5D Total scoreStandard Deviation 0.22
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)

The number of patients who choose the best opinion of overall satisfaction among Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale(CGIC) among 7 point scale. Missing data was imputed by LOCF. Scores measure from 1: Very much improved to 7:very much worse.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: In the per protocol: Analyze the within-group change in the CGIC from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 6 of the investigational product administration by using a paired t-test, and analyze the between-group difference in the change of satisfaction by using a t-test.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BuprenorphineClinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)2.28 Scores on 1 to 7 pointStandard Deviation 1.21
Tramadol/AcetaminophenClinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)2.43 Scores on 1 to 7 pointStandard Deviation 1.01
Secondary

Patient Global Impressions of Change(PGIC)

In the PP set, Number of participants with categorical change in overall satisfaction. PGIC: a participant-rated instrument assessing change in participant's overall satisfaction from baseline, on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Per protocol set: Analyze the within-group change in the PGIC from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 6 by using a paired t-test, and analyze the between-group difference in the change of satisfaction by using a t-test.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BuprenorphinePatient Global Impressions of Change(PGIC)2.32 Scores on 1 to 7pointStandard Deviation 1.22
Tramadol/AcetaminophenPatient Global Impressions of Change(PGIC)2.45 Scores on 1 to 7pointStandard Deviation 0.93

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026