Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit Patients, Physician-Family Communication in Intensive Care Units, Surrogate Decision-making for Critically Ill Patients
Conditions
Keywords
decision making, values elicitation, patient centered care, Four Supports, Family Support
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a multi-faceted communication intervention for family members of critically ill patients to reduce the family members' long-term symptoms of depression and anxiety.
Detailed description
One in four elderly Americans die in or shortly after discharge from an intensive care unit. An expanding body of literature documents that physician-family communication and end-of-life care is poor in intensive care units. These deficiencies are associated with high rates of adverse psychological outcomes among surrogates, physician-family conflict, and life support decisions that may be inconsistent with patients' goals and preferences. There is a lack of information on practical, generalizable interventions that effectively improve this important aspect of care for elderly patients and their families. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted communication intervention as compared to an educational control to improve psychological outcomes among family members of critically ill patients, using a randomized, controlled trial design. This randomized controlled trial involves adding a Family Support Specialist (FSS) to the clinical team to provide four types of support to the families of patients with advanced critical illness: emotional support, communication support (between the clinical team and the family), decisional support (education about the role of a surrogate decision maker) and anticipatory grief support. The overall aim of the study is to improve the long-term psychological outcomes for family members of critically ill patients, to improve the quality of communication and decision-making between physicians and families, and to improve the patient-centeredness of care. What happens in the study? Patient is randomized to one of two groups: 1. INTERVENTION GROUP: Family Support Specialist is added to the clinical team to provide emotional support to the family and facilitate frequent communication with the clinical team. 2. CONTROL GROUP: Receives usual care with the addition of two educational sessions provided by the FSS to teach family members about the ICU environment. What do participants need to do? Family Members: Interact with the Family Support Specialist daily. Family Support Specialist addresses family needs and ensures that their questions are addressed. Physicians: Collaborate with the Family Support Specialist to determine how best to support the family as well as attending clinician-family meetings. Sample size: With a sample size of 300 patients (450 surrogates), the study is well powered to detect small and clinically important differences in the primary outcome measure Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS).The trial's original sample size of 400 patients (600 surrogates) was chosen to maximize the power to detect differences in a secondary outcome measure (costs) that required a substantially larger sample size than the primary outcome (HADS). Since the original power calculations were conducted, new data were published which indicated that cost analysis in this context will require an even larger sample size based one effect modification from whether the patient lived or died. Therefore, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended revising the sample size to power the trial on the primary outcome (HADS), which required 300 patients (450 surrogates).
Interventions
BEHAVIORALFour Supports Intervention
The Four Supports Intervention is a multi-faceted intervention involving the addition of a trained nurse/social worker interventionist to the patient's care team who delivers four kinds of support: emotional support, communication support, decision support, and anticipatory grief support.
BEHAVIORALEducational Control Intervention
In addition to usual care, enrolled surrogates will receive two 15-minute education sessions about critical illness and mechanical ventilation on days 2 and 5, delivered by a research staff coordinator with education in critical care nursing.
Sponsors
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
University of Pittsburgh
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Patient Inclusion criteria: 1. age ≥21, 2. lack of decision making capacity as determined by clinical examination by the attending physician, 3. APACHE II score ≥ 22, AND/OR 4. \> 40% risk of death in hospital or \>40% chance of severe long term functional impairment as judged by the patient's attending physician. Patient
Exclusion criteria
1. lack of a surrogate decision maker and 2. impending organ transplantation. 3. decisions regarding care and treatment already made 4. not currently participating in competing research study 5. Discharged prior to enrollment 6. Incarcerated. Surrogate Inclusion criteria: 1. age ≥ 18 years, 2. self-identify as being involved in surrogate decision-making for the patient, up to a total of four family/surrogates. 3. able to give full informed consent, and 4. able to complete written questionnaires. Surrogate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | participants will be followed six months following the patient's death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 195 days | Burden of anxiety and depression will be measured in family members 6 months after enrollment using the validated 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient and family-centeredness of care | At 6 months | Patient and family-centeredness of care measured using the 12-item Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care Scale (PPPC) adapted to use by surrogates. |
| Total Hospital Costs | Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks | he costs are measured using aggregate data form the date of hospital admission through hospital discharge |
| Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay | Participants will be followed for duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 21 days | The Intensive Care Unit length of stay , assessed by abstraction from hospital administrative records |
| Hospital Length of stay | Participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks | Hospital length of stay length of stay , assessed by abstraction from hospital administrative records |
| Impact of Events scale at 6 months | at 6 months | Symptoms of post traumatic stress in family members assessed using the validated 22 item Impact of Events Scale. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Activity of Daily Living | At 6 months | Functional status of the patient is assessed using the validated Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale. |
| Vital Status | At 6 months | Mortality of the patient will be assessed at 6 months using hospital administrative records, and the 6-month follow-up with surrogate decision makers. |
| Concordance between clinicians and surrogates about patient's prognosis (CSCS) | Participants are followed at time of enrollment, on day 5 of enrollment, and weekly thereafter for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks | Prognostic estimates of survival and long-term functional impairment are measured responses by assessing the surrogate decision maker and the physician |
| HADS | at 3 months | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale |
| Discharge Dispensation | Participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks | The disposition of the patient at time of discharge will be assessed via chart abstraction |
| Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) | Participants are followed at time of enrollment and on day 5 of enrollment | This validated instrument measures personal perceptions of: 1. uncertainty in choosing options; 2. modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uniformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making; and 3. effective decision making such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice. |
| Quality of Communication Scale | Day 5 of enrollment | Quality of communication in family members is assessed using the validated 19 item Quality of Communication Scale |
| Impact of Events Scale | at 3 months | Symptoms of post traumatic stress in family members assessed using the validated 22 item Impact of Events Scale. |
| Inventory of Complicated Grief | At 3 months and at 6 months | This validated instrument consists of 19 first-person statements concerning the immediate bereavement-related thoughts and behaviors of the participant. |
| Utilization of Mental Health Treatment | At 3 months and 6 months | The utilization of mental health treatment is tracked via participant interview |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed