Skip to content

Effect of an Outpatient Intervention Program in Patients With Chronic Back or Neck Pain

The Long-term Effect of an Outpatient Intervention Program With a Behavioral Therapy Approach in Patients With Chronic Back or Neck Pain With a Focus on Psychosocial Aspects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01981798
Acronym
CPS
Enrollment
121
Registered
2013-11-13
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2013-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain, Neck Pain

Keywords

outpatient intervention program, behavioral therapy approach, unspecific back pain, unspecific neck pain, chronic pain, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychosocial aspects, fear avoidance beliefs, health-related quality of life

Brief summary

To investigated whether an ambulant intervention program with a behavioral therapy approach would exert a long-term effect on chronic unspecific back or neck pain. Specifically, the effect on patients with pronounced fear avoidance behavior and/or with psychosocial limitations was addressed.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Sustained success of ambulant intervention programs consisting of individual and group physiotherapy in patients with with chronic unspecific back or neck pain (cBP) has not been conclusively proven. It's still not clear whether one can achieve such success by devoting greater attention to psychosocial factors. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether an ambulant intervention program with a behavioral therapy approach would exert a long-term effect on cBP. Specifically, the effect on patients with pronounced fear avoidance behavior and/or with psychosocial limitations was addressed. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial SETTINGS, INTERVENTION: 64 patients were assigned to intervention group (IG) and 57 to control group (CG). All were examined, informed about cBP, and were encouraged to stay active and perform exercises according to specific instructions provided in a neck- or back-book. The IG received 9 units of physiotherapy and 2 units of occupational therapy, conducted with a behavioral therapy approach. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated after 6 and 58 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Pain (VAS), quantity of painkillers consumed, sick leave days, Oswestry-Disability-Index (ODI), SF-36, FABQ.

Interventions

Members of the training group received 9 units of physiotherapy and 2 units of occupational therapy, each with a duration of one hour. Every patient of the IG was trained to perform a neck or back intervention program specifically suited to his/her needs. The training was conducted in a single session by one of three experienced physiotherapists (with mean work experience of 6 years). After this training the patients completed eight group training units consisting a maximum number of 8 participants, each unit with a duration of one hour, over a maximum period of six weeks.

Sponsors

Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* minimum age 18 years, maximum age: men 55 years, women 50 years. * the patients had been on sick leave for a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 22 days during the preceding 12 months because of nonspecific spinal symptoms in the back or neck. * The patients had to be working at the start of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Specific causes of spinal symptoms (after spinal surgery, known vertebral body fractures, disk prolapse with motor deficits or other radicular lesions, tumor, osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, rheumatic disease, osteoporosis). * Retired persons, those in the process of being screened for retirement, unemployed persons, * pregnancy or persons on maternity leave * Planned surgery during the phase of intervention * persons who were unable to participate in the intervention program for other reasons (physical, psychological, linguistic or organizational).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PainAfter 0 / 6 / 58 WeeksTo evaluate the main hypothesis, current pain and mean pain during the preceding week and the preceding 3 months were determined on a visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100, lower scores indicate less severe pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional impairmentAfter 0 / 6 / 58 weeksThe Oswestry disability index was used to measure functional impairment.
Anxiety, insecurity in social contacts and compulsivenessAfter 0 / 6 / 58 weeksAnxiety, insecurity in social contacts and compulsiveness were registered on the brief symptoms inventory (BSI), which is an abridged version of SCL-90\_R. The BSI addresses subjective experience of impairment based on a list of symptoms that are partly physical and partly psychological. The time frame is seven days.
Social function, psychological wellbeing and emotional role functionAfter 0 / 6 / 58 weeksTo evaluate social function, psychological wellbeing and emotional role function we used the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36; scales 0-100, lower scores indicate poorer social, psychological and emotional quality of life)
PainkillersAfter 0 / 58 weeksThe number of painkillers taken per day were inquired.
Fear avoidance behaviorAfter 0 / 6 / 58 weeksFear avoidance behavior was determined by means of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ; scale 0-66; lower scores indicate lower fear-avoidance beliefs)
Sick leave daysAfter 0 / 58 weeksThe number of (self-reported) days of sick leave due to pain during the preceding twelve months were inquired.

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026