Skip to content

Difference in Efficacy of Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

Essai de Phase IV, Multicentrique, Ouvert, Visant à Tester la différence d'efficacité du Natalizumab, Versus le Fingolimod, 2 médicaments Ayant Une AMM Pour le Traitement de la sclérose en Plaques

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01981161
Acronym
BEST-MS
Enrollment
307
Registered
2013-11-11
Start date
2013-11-19
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2020-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy, JC virus, Zoster infection

Brief summary

Under the escalation treatment strategy when a patient displays breakthrough disease parameters under first line therapy, MS physicians are allowed by the EMEA to switch for Natalizumab (NTZ) or fingolimod (FGL). NTZ and FGL efficacy have been demonstrated by randomized therapeutic trial. As both treatments have been tested versus placebo a common way to compare them is to look at their respective annualized relapse risk ratio decrease. Roughly NTZ decrease by 70% and FGL by 50%. Nevertheless it is a terrible comparison since the placebo group had different behaviour in the 2 trials and the patients demographic features at baseline are also different. Therefore, it is right now totally impossible to compare these 2 drugs with a decent methodology. Only a head-to-head comparison could do it. Unfortunately this head-to-head comparison is not available and will not probably be done under the drug companies initiative. During the time of this study, we will perform a phase IV, observational, prospective head-to-head comparison of NTZ versus FGL efficacy in 600 patients. Our primary end point will be disease free patients after 1 year of treatment. Further, this trial will allow us to collect new biological samples, useful for a validation our project main aim. Further these new samples will be obtained from 3 European countries, which is a must if we want to generalize our conclusion obtained from a French cohort. Cooperation at the European level is thus essential for the implementation of this project .

Interventions

PROCEDUREbiological samples and clinical data

Sponsors

European Commission
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS in line with McDonald criteria; * patient needing to be treated with FGL or NTZ, either: * Patients who have not responded to complete and well-conducted treatment with beta interferon. The patients should have presented at least one relapse during the course of the previous year while they were receiving treatment, and should present at least 9 hyper-intense lesions within T2 on a cerebral MRI, or at least 1 enhancing lesion following injection of Gadolinium; or * Patients presenting severe and rapidly developing relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, defined by 2 debilitating relapses or more during the course of one year, combined with 1 or more high-intensity lesion(s) following injection of Gadolinium on a cerebral MRI, or a significant increase in lesion load within T2 compared to a recent prior MRI. * EDSS score between 0 and 6, not inclusive; * patient who give informed consent, and signed the consent form; * patient available for 12-month follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

* General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Disease free patients1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comparing the efficacy of Natalizumab with that of Fingolimod with regard to the annual incidence rate (comparison against the annual incidence rate criterion after 1 year1 year

Countries

France, Germany, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026