Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of KTP-001 in Subjects With Lumbar Disc Herniation

Open-Label, Non-controlled, Single Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Exploratory Efficacy of KTP-001 in Subjects With Lumbar Disc Herniation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01978912
Enrollment
24
Registered
2013-11-08
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2018-10-16
Last updated
2020-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and exploratory efficacy of KTP-001 in subjects with lumbar disc herniation.

Detailed description

This study was a first-in-human, open-label, non-controlled single ascending dose study of KTP-001 in male and female subjects between the ages of 30 and 70 years with a single herniated lumbar disc. After obtaining informed consent, subjects were evaluated during a screening period of no more than 3 weeks (21 days). This study was conducted in 10 centers in the US. Subjects that met all screening requirements and inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled into the study. Overall, 24 subjects were enrolled and treated: 6 subjects in each cohort. Cohort 1 received a 5 μg/disc dose of KTP-001 by intradiscal injection. Following administration of study drug, subjects were confined to the study center for 24 hours to collect data for safety and efficacy measures and collect blood samples for safety, PK evaluation, exploratory PD and anti-KTP-001 antibody and then returned for further assessments at various intervals from weeks 1 through to month 24. After all subjects in Cohort 1 had received study drug, safety measures were evaluated by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) to determine whether to escalate KTP-001 administration to the next dose level. If appropriate, Cohort 2 subjects received 15 μg/disc of KTP-001, Cohort 3 subjects received 50 μg/disc of KTP-001, and Cohort 4 subjects received 150 μg/disc of KTP-001 by intradiscal injection. All safety, PK, and exploratory efficacy assessments were performed for the subjects in the subsequent cohorts as were performed for Cohort 1.

Interventions

DRUGKTP-001

KTP-001 is one time dose intradiscally.

Sponsors

Teijin America, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has had a single contained or noncontained (extruded) lumbar disc herniation (L3-L4, L4-L5 or L5-S1) diagnosed by clinical symptoms and/or physical findings and confirmed by MRI. * Subject has leg pain with a documented positive straight leg raise (SLR) test or femoral stretch test (FST). * Subject has experiences herniated disc symptoms for at least 6 weeks prior to the study without relief with pain medications and other therapies. * Subject has a BMI of 18 to 35 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a sequestered lumbar disc herniation or intrathecal herniation confirmed by MRI * Subject has two or more symptomatic lumbar disc herniations * Previous intradiscal therapeutic intervention or has had any lumbar surgery * Presence of lumbar spine disease and/or deformity other than a lumbar disc herniation * Active smoker or is unable to abstain from tobacco use for 2 weeks prior to study injection * Subject has a history or presence of significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, neurologic, or psychiatric disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital Signs24 monthsAny clinically significant changes were recorded as adverse events. They are described in the adverse events section of the results. AEs related to MRI, X-ray Imaging, Physical examination, and Neurologic examination are considered as adverse events of special interest (AESI). A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that was not present prior to treatment with study drug, but appeared following treatment or was present at treatment initiation but worsened in severity during treatment.
Number of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)13 weeksAssessment of the number of participants with change in 12-lead ECG and CLT were assessed from baseline, 24 hours and 13 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)13 weeksThe serum concentrations of KTP-001 were below the limit of quantification (BLQ) (\<100 ng/mL) at all time points in all participants
Number of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 Antibody13 weeks

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Baseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-doseThe Patient Global Impression Change PGI-C scale was used where the scale ranges are from 1 (no change or condition has got worse) to 7 (a great deal better, and a considerable improvement). The endpoint was the value at 6 and 13 weeks post-dose.
Changes in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleBaseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-doseLower back and leg pain were assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain). The endpoint was mean change from baseline at 6 and 13 weeks post-dose; with a negative number suggesting an improvement in pain while a positive number suggests a worsening in pain.
Changes in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateBaseline, 6 and 24 hours and 1, 2, 4, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-doseThe endpoint was change from baseline at 6 and 24 hours post-dose, and at the 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, and 13-week follow-up visits or early termination visit.
Number of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestBaseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-doseThe changes to spinal flexion and tension were assessed using Straight-Leg Rising (SLR) and Femoral Stretch (FS) tests which are on a scale of no change, positive to negative or negative to positive and where a positive result for SLR may indicate between 30 and 70 degrees, where a positive result for FS may indicate pain in the anterior thigh of the test leg and the elicited pain.
Number of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-doseThe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score is calculated as participant score divided by possible score multiplied by 100, where the following scores can be interpreted to indicate: 0-20% = Minimal disability; 20-40% = Moderate disability; 40-60% = Severe disability; 60-80% = Crippled; 80-100% = Bed bound;
Changes in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Baseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-doseThe endpoint was change from baseline at Week 6 and 13 hours post-dose. The Short Form-12 (SF-12) is a Quality of Life questionnaire which measures functional health and well-being from a participant's perspective across eight health domains. Each participant answers questions on a 5-point Likert scale, which rates responses according to how much the participant agrees or disagrees with a particular statement on their health and wellbeing, including vitality/physical functioning/bodily pain/general health perceptions/physical role functioning/emotional role functioning/social role functioning and mental health. Each scale is transformed into a 0-100 scale, assuming each question carries equal weight. Lower scores mean greater disability and higher scores mean less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/Disc
KTP-001: KTP-001 is one time dose intradiscally.
6
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/Disc
KTP-001: KTP-001 is one time dose intradiscally.
6
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/Disc
KTP-001: KTP-001 is one time dose intradiscally.
6
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/Disc
KTP-001: KTP-001 is one time dose intradiscally.
6
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0100
Overall StudyIntradiscal Steroid Injection0100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1101
Overall StudyLumbar Surgery1010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1022

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscCohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscCohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscCohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscTotal
Age, Continuous36.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.33
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
52.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.23
47.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.49
46.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.68
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants5 Participants5 Participants6 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants6 Participants6 Participants4 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 66 / 66 / 65 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 62 / 61 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)

Assessment of the number of participants with change in 12-lead ECG and CLT were assessed from baseline, 24 hours and 13 weeks.

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants with abnormal changes in ECG0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants without abnormal changes in ECG6 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants with abnormal CLT0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants without abnormal CL6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants without abnormal changes in ECG6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants with abnormal CLT0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants without abnormal CL6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants with abnormal changes in ECG0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants with abnormal CLT0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants without abnormal changes in ECG6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants without abnormal CL6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants with abnormal changes in ECG0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants without abnormal CL6 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants without abnormal changes in ECG6 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants with abnormal changes in ECG0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Change in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Clinical Laboratory Tests (CLT)Participants with abnormal CLT0 Participants
Primary

Safety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital Signs

Any clinically significant changes were recorded as adverse events. They are described in the adverse events section of the results. AEs related to MRI, X-ray Imaging, Physical examination, and Neurologic examination are considered as adverse events of special interest (AESI). A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that was not present prior to treatment with study drug, but appeared following treatment or was present at treatment initiation but worsened in severity during treatment.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any AESIs4 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any TEAEs6 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsTEAEs leading to study discontinuation0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any serious TEAEs1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any AEs6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any serious TEAEs2 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any AESIs4 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsTEAEs leading to study discontinuation1 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any TEAEs6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any AEs6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any serious TEAEs1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any AEs6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any TEAEs6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any AESIs3 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsTEAEs leading to study discontinuation0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any AESIs2 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any TEAEs5 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any AEs5 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsParticipants with any serious TEAEs0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscSafety Assessed by Adverse Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray Imaging, Physical Examination, Neurologic Examination and Vital SignsTEAEs leading to study discontinuation0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)

The serum concentrations of KTP-001 were below the limit of quantification (BLQ) (\<100 ng/mL) at all time points in all participants

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)BLQ during the study up to 13 weeks6 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)Not BLQ during the study up to 13 weeks0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)Not BLQ during the study up to 13 weeks0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)BLQ during the study up to 13 weeks6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)BLQ during the study up to 13 weeks6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)Not BLQ during the study up to 13 weeks0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)BLQ during the study up to 13 weeks6 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants Serum Concentrations of KTP-001 Below the Limit of Quantification (BLQ)Not BLQ during the study up to 13 weeks0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 Antibody

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 AntibodyNegative during the study up to 13 weeks6 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 AntibodyPositive during the study up to 13 weeks0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 AntibodyPositive during the study up to 13 weeks0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 AntibodyNegative during the study up to 13 weeks6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 AntibodyNegative during the study up to 13 weeks6 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 AntibodyPositive during the study up to 13 weeks0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 AntibodyNegative during the study up to 13 weeks6 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Anti-KTP-001 AntibodyPositive during the study up to 13 weeks0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating Scale

Lower back and leg pain were assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain). The endpoint was mean change from baseline at 6 and 13 weeks post-dose; with a negative number suggesting an improvement in pain while a positive number suggests a worsening in pain.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) was used which consists of any subject who was enrolled into the study, received study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy evaluation after receiving study drug. In some cohorts, number of subjects are below 6 participants due to discontinuation and/or data missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Average Daily Pain at Week13-2.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.053
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Worst Daily Pain at Week13-2.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.074
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Leg Pain at Week 13-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.05
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Low Back Pain at Week 6-3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Average Daily Pain at Week 6-2.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.669
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Average Daily Pain at Week 6-3.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.587
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Average Daily Pain at Week 13-3.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.919
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Low Back Pain at Week 13-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Worst Daily Pain at Week 6-2.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.449
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Worst Daily Pain at Week 6-3.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.984
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Worst Daily Pain at Week 13-2.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.928
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Leg Pain at Week 6-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.42
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Low Back Pain at Week 13-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Leg Pain at Week 6-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Average Daily Pain at Week 13-4.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.787
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Average Daily Pain at Week 6-4.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.515
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Average Daily Pain at Week13-5.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.145
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Leg Pain at Week 13-5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Low Back Pain at Week 6-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Worst Daily Pain at Week 13-4.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.303
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Worst Daily Pain at Week 6-4.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.066
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Average Daily Pain at Week 6-3.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.448
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Worst Daily Pain at Week13-5.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.159
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Worst Daily Pain at Week 6-4.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.355
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Leg Pain at Week 13-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.87
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Low Back Pain at Week 6-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Low Back Pain at Week 13-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.18
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Average Daily Pain at Week 6-3.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.674
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Average Daily Pain at Week 13-2.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.572
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Worst Daily Pain at Week 6-3.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.018
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Worst Daily Pain at Week 13-2.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.829
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Leg Pain at Week 6-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.96
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Average Daily Pain at Week 6-3.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.985
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Average Daily Pain at Week13-4.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.647
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Worst Daily Pain at Week 6-4.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.239
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Worst Daily Pain at Week13-4.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.986
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Worst Daily Pain at Week 13-2.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.089
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Worst Daily Pain at Week 6-3.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.488
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Low Back Pain at Week 6-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Average Daily Pain at Week13-5.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.669
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Average Daily Pain at Week 13-4.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.669
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Low Back Average Daily Pain at Week 6-3.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.551
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Worst Daily Pain at Week13-5.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.275
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Worst Daily Pain at Week 6-3.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.294
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Leg Pain at Week 13-4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.13
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Leg Pain at Week 6-4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Current Low Back Pain at Week 13-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Lower Back Pain or Leg Pain Assessed by 11-point Numerical Rating ScaleChange in Leg Average Daily Pain at Week 6-4.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.476
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)

The endpoint was change from baseline at Week 6 and 13 hours post-dose. The Short Form-12 (SF-12) is a Quality of Life questionnaire which measures functional health and well-being from a participant's perspective across eight health domains. Each participant answers questions on a 5-point Likert scale, which rates responses according to how much the participant agrees or disagrees with a particular statement on their health and wellbeing, including vitality/physical functioning/bodily pain/general health perceptions/physical role functioning/emotional role functioning/social role functioning and mental health. Each scale is transformed into a 0-100 scale, assuming each question carries equal weight. Lower scores mean greater disability and higher scores mean less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) was used which consists of any subject who was enrolled into the study, received study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy evaluation after receiving study drug. In some cohorts, number of subjects are below 6 participants due to discontinuation and/or data missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Bodily Pain score at Week 13-0.167 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3764
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in General Health score at Week 60.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Bodily Pain score at Week 6-0.100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3791
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Social Functioning score at Week 130.125 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2092
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in General Health score at Week 130.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Physical Functioning score at Week 130.208 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2458
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Emotional score at Week 60.1000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34686
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Vitality score at Week 130.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3162
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Physical score at Week 60.2500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35355
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Physical Functioning score at Week 60.400 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4183
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Emotional score at Week 130.1875 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27099
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Mental Health score at Week 13-0.0417 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.06455
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Vitality score at Week 6-0.100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2236
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Physical score at Week 130.1667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23274
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Mental Health score at Week 60.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08839
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Social Functioning score at Week 60.100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.285
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Mental Health score at Week 60.0625 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.06847
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Physical score at Week 60.2292 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27858
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Mental Health score at Week 130.1667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2189
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Physical Functioning score at Week 60.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3028
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Physical Functioning score at Week 130.500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3162
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Vitality score at Week 13-0.125 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1369
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in General Health score at Week 13-0.042 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1021
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Bodily Pain score at Week 6-0.417 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2041
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Social Functioning score at Week 60.292 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2923
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Social Functioning score at Week 130.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3028
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in General Health score at Week 60.042 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1021
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Emotional score at Week 60.2292 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25516
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Bodily Pain score at Week 13-0.417 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2041
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Physical score at Week 130.2083 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32275
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Emotional score at Week 130.3542 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.30017
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Vitality score at Week 6-0.167 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1291
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Bodily Pain score at Week 6-0.300 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2739
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in General Health score at Week 13-0.167 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1291
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Vitality score at Week 60.050 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2092
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Vitality score at Week 13-0.042 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2923
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Social Functioning score at Week 60.250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Social Functioning score at Week 130.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3764
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Emotional score at Week 60.2500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19764
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Emotional score at Week 130.2083 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.20412
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Mental Health score at Week 60.0250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13693
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Mental Health score at Week 130.0208 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14613
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Physical Functioning score at Week 60.400 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4183
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Physical Functioning score at Week 130.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5401
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Physical score at Week 60.3000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.20917
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Physical score at Week 130.3333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41583
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Bodily Pain score at Week 13-0.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3028
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in General Health score at Week 6-0.100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1369
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Bodily Pain score at Week 13-0.400 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.285
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Physical score at Week 60.2250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31125
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Emotional score at Week 130.2750 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32355
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Emotional score at Week 60.1750 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31375
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Social Functioning score at Week 130.400 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.285
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Role Physical score at Week 130.3750 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15309
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Social Functioning score at Week 60.300 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2092
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Vitality score at Week 13-0.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2739
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Bodily Pain score at Week 6-0.350 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1369
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Vitality score at Week 6-0.250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in General Health score at Week 13-0.100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1369
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Physical Functioning score at Week 60.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2092
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in General Health score at Week 6-0.150 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1369
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Physical Functioning score at Week 130.250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Mental Health score at Week 130.0250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16298
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12)Change in Mental Health score at Week 6-0.0500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22707
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate

The endpoint was change from baseline at 6 and 24 hours post-dose, and at the 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, and 13-week follow-up visits or early termination visit.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 hours and 1, 2, 4, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) was used which consists of any subject who was enrolled into the study, received study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy evaluation after receiving study drug. In some cohorts, number of subjects are below 6 participants due to discontinuation and/or data missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate6 hours-93.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 59.22
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 61.4 ng/mlStandard Deviation 74.31
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 4-6.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 45.44
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate24 hours-39.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 87.9
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 13-7.5 ng/mlStandard Deviation 127.3
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 177.3 ng/mlStandard Deviation 30.66
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 247.0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 62.77
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 6-41.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 69.84
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 222.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 81.96
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 147.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 47.31
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 4-36.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 66.22
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 13-39.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 63.9
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate24 hours-73.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 34.59
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate6 hours-84.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 47.24
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 2102.0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 69.13
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate6 hours-37.3 ng/mlStandard Deviation 42.28
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate24 hours35.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 72.37
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 1117.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 41.31
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 487.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 49.6
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 664.0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 61.46
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 1355.8 ng/mlStandard Deviation 83.71
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 1297.3 ng/mlStandard Deviation 144.99
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 13-13.6 ng/mlStandard Deviation 43.64
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 611.0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 81.86
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate24 hours141.8 ng/mlStandard Deviation 262.07
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan Sulfate6 hours-24.8 ng/mlStandard Deviation 49.68
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 426.8 ng/mlStandard Deviation 79.08
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscChanges in Serum Concentrations of Keratan SulfateWeek 2173.2 ng/mlStandard Deviation 120.44
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score is calculated as participant score divided by possible score multiplied by 100, where the following scores can be interpreted to indicate: 0-20% = Minimal disability; 20-40% = Moderate disability; 40-60% = Severe disability; 60-80% = Crippled; 80-100% = Bed bound;

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) was used which consists of any subject who was enrolled into the study, received study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy evaluation after receiving study drug. In some cohorts, number of subjects are below 6 participants due to discontinuation and/or data missing.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline60-80 Crippled1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1340-60 Severe Disability1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 60-20 Minimal Disability2 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaselinemissing0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline80-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1320-40 Moderate Disability2 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline40-60 Severe Disability2 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 13missing0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline0-20 Minimal Disability0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1380-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 130-20 Minimal Disability2 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 6missing1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline20-40 Moderate Disability3 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1360-80 Crippled1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 680-100 Bedbound1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 660-80 Crippled0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 640-60 Severe Disability0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 620-40 Moderate Disability2 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline0-20 Minimal Disability0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline40-60 Severe Disability3 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 640-60 Severe Disability0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline20-40 Moderate Disability2 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline60-80 Crippled1 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline80-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaselinemissing0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 60-20 Minimal Disability1 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 620-40 Moderate Disability5 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 660-80 Crippled0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 680-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 6missing0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 130-20 Minimal Disability3 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1320-40 Moderate Disability3 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1340-60 Severe Disability0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1360-80 Crippled0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1380-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 13missing0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1360-80 Crippled0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1380-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1320-40 Moderate Disability2 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 680-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 640-60 Severe Disability0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1340-60 Severe Disability1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline80-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 660-80 Crippled0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline40-60 Severe Disability4 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 6missing1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaselinemissing0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline0-20 Minimal Disability0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline60-80 Crippled1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 13missing0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 60-20 Minimal Disability2 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 130-20 Minimal Disability3 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline20-40 Moderate Disability1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 620-40 Moderate Disability3 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 13missing1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 620-40 Moderate Disability2 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 640-60 Severe Disability0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline20-40 Moderate Disability3 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 660-80 Crippled0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1360-80 Crippled0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 680-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline0-20 Minimal Disability0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 130-20 Minimal Disability4 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1380-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1320-40 Moderate Disability1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline80-100 Bedbound0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline60-80 Crippled2 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 1340-60 Severe Disability0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaselinemissing0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 6missing1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexWeek 60-20 Minimal Disability3 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes in the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline40-60 Severe Disability1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch Test

The changes to spinal flexion and tension were assessed using Straight-Leg Rising (SLR) and Femoral Stretch (FS) tests which are on a scale of no change, positive to negative or negative to positive and where a positive result for SLR may indicate between 30 and 70 degrees, where a positive result for FS may indicate pain in the anterior thigh of the test leg and the elicited pain.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-dose

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Missing1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Missing1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6No change5 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Positive to Negative0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Positive to Negative3 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6No change2 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Missing0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13No change5 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13No change2 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Positive to Negative4 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Positive to Negative1 Participants
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Missing0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Positive to Negative6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13No change0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Missing0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Positive to Negative0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6No change6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Missing0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Positive to Negative0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Missing0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13No change6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Missing0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Positive to Negative6 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6No change0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Missing0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Missing1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Positive to Negative2 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13No change2 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13No change4 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Missing1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Missing0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6No change1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Positive to Negative4 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Positive to Negative1 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Positive to Negative4 Participants
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6No change4 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Positive to Negative4 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6No change1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Missing1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13No change1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Missing1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Positive to Negative0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Positive to Negative4 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Missing1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 13Negative to Positive0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestStraight-Leg Raising Test at Week 6Missing1 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6Positive to Negative0 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 13No change5 Participants
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscNumber of Participants With Changes to Spinal Flexion and Tension Using the Straight-Leg Rising and/or Femoral Stretch TestFemoral Stretch Test at Week 6No change5 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

The Patient Global Impression Change PGI-C scale was used where the scale ranges are from 1 (no change or condition has got worse) to 7 (a great deal better, and a considerable improvement). The endpoint was the value at 6 and 13 weeks post-dose.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 13 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) was used which consists of any subject who was enrolled into the study, received study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy evaluation after receiving study drug. In some cohorts, number of subjects are below 6 participants due to discontinuation and/or data missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 64.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
Cohort 1 KTP-001 5 μg/DiscPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 134.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 132.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Cohort 2 KTP-001 15 μg/DiscPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 62.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 63.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
Cohort 3 KTP-001 50 μg/DiscPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 133.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 62.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Cohort 4 KTP-001 150 μg/DiscPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 132.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026