Skip to content

Injections of FloGraft Therapy, Autologous Stem Cells, or Platelet Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Degenerative Joint Pain

Outcomes of Single Injections of FloGraft Therapy, Autologous Stem Cells, or Platelet Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Pain in the Lumbar Facet Joints, Sacroiliac Joints, Upper Extremity Joints, and Lower Extremity Joints

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01978639
Enrollment
300
Registered
2013-11-07
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This study will assess the outcomes of three currently available regenerative treatments (FloGraft, autologous stem cell therapy, platelet rich plasma therapy) for painful degenerative conditions of the joints. Patients receiving one these treatments will be assessed before the treatment procedure and followed up at four points over the six months after their procedure. Patients' pain, quality of life, and pain medication use at follow up will be compared to baseline levels. The investigators hypothesize that all three treatments will be effective in reducing pain, improving quality of life, and reducing pain medication usage.

Detailed description

This is an open-label, non-randomized study assessing the efficacy of three potentially regenerative treatments for degenerative conditions of the joints of the lower back (facet, sacroiliac), upper extremities (e.g., shoulder), and lower extremities (e.g., hip, knee). These treatments are: 1. A single injection of Applied Biologics' FloGraftTM. 2. A single injection of autologous bone marrow derived stem cells. 3. A single injection of platelet rich plasma. Subjects will be assessed prior to treatment for their level of pain, quality of life, and pain medication usage. Subjects will be followed up at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after treatment. At each of these follow up visits, pain, quality of life, and pain medication usage will be assessed. The investigators hypothesize that all three treatment groups will experience reduced pain, improved quality of life, and reduced pain medication usage at follow up.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Arizona Pain Specialists
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older, * Ability to complete follow-up visits, * Able to understand the study protocol and provide consent, * Significant pain (average pain in the past month greater than or equal to 5, from 0-10), * Pain lasting at least 3 months, * Pain associated with one of the following conditions: lumbar facet degeneration, - OR -degenerative condition causing upper extremity joint pain, - OR - degenerative condition causing lower extremity joint pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Current litigation or worker's compensation claim, * Unstable pain medication dosage, * Previous surgery at the affected site, * Injections at the affected site within the past 6 months, * Uncontrolled psychiatric condition, * Pregnancy or lactating in women, * History of adverse reactions to local anesthetic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Pain Rating Scale24 week follow upWorst pain in the past 24 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index24 week follow upTotal score from the Oswestry Disability Index
SF-3624 week follow upTotal score from the SF-36
Pain Medications survey24 week follow upReduction in reported pain medication usage.
Global Pain Scale24 week follow upLevels of pain, emotional health, quality of life, and activities of daily living.
Adverse Events24 week follow upAny adverse events between the study procedure and the 24 week follow up will be assessed.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026