Skip to content

High Tibial Osteotomy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

High Tibial Osteotomy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01977261
Acronym
HTO
Enrollment
92
Registered
2013-11-06
Start date
2001-01-31
Completion date
2004-04-30
Last updated
2013-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

A prospective, randomised, controlled trial compared two different techniques of high tibial osteotomy with a lateral closing wedge or a medial opening wedge, stabilised by a Puddu plate. The clinical outcome and radiological results were examined at one year.

Detailed description

A prospective, randomised, controlled trial compared two different techniques of high tibial osteotomy with a lateral closing wedge or a medial opening wedge, stabilised by a Puddu plate. The clinical outcome and radiological results were examined at one year. The primary outcome measure was the achievement of an overcorrection of valgus of 4°. Secondary outcome measures were the severity of pain (visual analogue scale), knee function (Hospital for Special Surgery score), and walking distance.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpening-wedge HTO

Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy fixated with a Puddu plate

PROCEDUREClosing-wedge HTO

Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy fixated with two staples

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Radiological OA, medial joint pain and varus malalignment

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic OA of the lateral compartment, rheumatoid arthritis, ROM \<100, collateral ligament laxity, history of fracture of previous open operation of the lower limb and a flexion contracture \> 10 degrees.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The achievement of an overcorrection of valgus of 4°.one yearThe achieved correction will be determined on a whole leg radiograph.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severity of painone yearSeverity of pain will be measured with the visual analogue scale
Knee functionone yearKnee function will be measured with the Hospital for Special Surgery score
Walking distanceone year

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with adverse eventsone yearNumber of participants with adverse events; infection, loss of correction, hardware removal, implant failure, pseudoarthrosis, peroneal nerve injury.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026