Alcohol and Drug Abuse
Conditions
Keywords
sober living houses, HIV, alcohol and drugs
Brief summary
The goal of the study is to see if a Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) intervention will improve outcomes for respondents who are on probation or parole, at risk for HIV and have recently entered a Sober Living House. The MICM will help respondents access needed services, adapt to their new living environment, find and maintain work, address HIV risk and treatment, and manage setbacks. The risk for HIV infection among criminal justice offenders is significant, as is the need for stable, drug free housing in this population. Our aim is to see if the MICM intervention in the context of drug free housing will improve health outcomes and reduce recidivism.
Detailed description
This study is based on the premise that probationers and parolees must have access to stable, drug-free housing to reduce HIV risk, access needed services and avoid rearrests and reincarceration. Drug-free housing at the Sober Living Network (SLN) in California are being studied as a way to provide a positive living environment for probationers and parolees. The houses use a sober living house (SLH) model of recovery that includes a communal recovery environment, abstinence from drugs and alcohol, peer support, and encouragement to attend self-help groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous. The proposed study will improve SLHs for offenders by adding a Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) intervention specifically targeted to the problems presented by each offender. The list of potential problems that MICM can address is extensive: 1) adapting to the SLH environment, 2) complying with parole and probation, 3) finding and maintain work, 4) successfully accessing and maintaining retention in services, 5) addressing HIV risk, testing and treatment, 6) mobilizing personal and informal resources, and 7) managing setbacks (e.g., relapse, loss of housing, loss of work). Men and women involved with the criminal justice system (N=330) entering SLHs will be assigned to a condition consisting of a provision of a resources manual where residents can seek help for a variety of problems (a control group) or the MICM (intervention).To avoid mixing individuals who receive the intervention with individuals who do not within the same house, houses are randomized at the house level. Once a house is randomized to a study condition, all of the individuals recruited from that house receive the same intervention, MICM or SLH as usual. To avoid contamination of study conditions by gender, randomization procedures are stratified by houses for men, women, and both genders. Research interviews are conducted at baseline (within one month of entering the houses), 6 months, and 12 months. Follow-up interviews are conducted whether or not the participant leaves the SLH and at a site that is the most comfortable for the participant.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Be 18 years or older * Speak English * Entered the sober living house in the last month * Able to provide contact info for followups * Willing to attend MICM sessions * On probation or parole * ONE of the following: tested positive for HIV, injected drugs, sex work history, men who have sex with men (MSM), or women who have had unprotected sex in the last month with multiple partners
Exclusion criteria
* serious mental health disorder that would hinder their ability to provide informed consent or otherwise participate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months | Measured by dichotomous measure of whether or not any time spent incarcerated in past 6 months.56 follow-up interviews were conducted in jails, when allowed and the participant was comfortable, but we did not conduct interviews in prison. See participant flow for number of participants in prison. |
| Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months | Measured by whether or not the participant reports complete abstinence from all substance use for last 6 months on Timeline Followback (TLFB). |
| Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months | Measured by whether or not the participant was worried about HIV in past 6 months. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The recruitment of 330 study participants followed a two-step process: first we recruited the house, and then we recruited residents that moved in to those houses. The approximately 50 SLHs participating in the study were located in the Los Angeles area and all were members of the Sober Living Network.
Pre-assignment details
To avoid mixing individuals who received the intervention with individuals who did not within the same house, we randomized at the house level. Once a house was randomized to a study condition, all of the individuals recruited from that house received the same intervention.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management MICM intervention combines aspects of motivational interviewing along with case management to influence HIV risk and recovery from alcohol and drug problems. Participants assigned to the MICM condition will be contacted to receive 3 individual sessions within the first 4 weeks of entering the study. Thereafter they will have contact with the MICM therapist monthly throughout the duration of their enrollment in the study (12 months).
Motivational interviewing case management | 149 |
| Control - Resource Referrals Respondents will receive sober living house services as usual along with a list of resources that can be used to address a variety of problems.
control - Resource referrals | 181 |
| Total | 330 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 3 | 4 |
| Overall Study | In prison | 3 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 23 | 14 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Control - Resource Referrals | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 147 Participants | 179 Participants | 326 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 38.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 | 39.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 | 38.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 23 Participants | 44 Participants | 67 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 126 Participants | 137 Participants | 263 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Legal status Parole | 20 Participants | 49 Participants | 69 Participants |
| Legal status Probation(including drug court) | 129 Participants | 132 Participants | 261 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 46 Participants | 34 Participants | 80 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 7 Participants | 13 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 91 Participants | 126 Participants | 217 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 149 Participants | 181 Participants | 330 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 44 Participants | 41 Participants | 85 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 105 Participants | 140 Participants | 245 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 3 / 149 | 4 / 181 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 149 | 0 / 181 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 12 / 149 | 30 / 181 |
Outcome results
Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back)
Measured by whether or not the participant reports complete abstinence from all substance use for last 6 months on Timeline Followback (TLFB).
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Population: 330 participants were interviewed at baseline. We attempted to follow up with all participants, whether or not they stayed at the sober living house, for 6 and 12 month follow up interviews.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | Baseline | Not abstinent | 100 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | Baseline | Abstinent | 49 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | 6 months | Not abstinent | 55 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | 6 months | Abstinent | 53 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | 12 months | Not abstinent | 62 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | 12 months | Abstinent | 56 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | 12 months | Not abstinent | 80 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | Baseline | Not abstinent | 126 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | 6 months | Abstinent | 63 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | Baseline | Abstinent | 55 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | 12 months | Abstinent | 71 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back) | 6 months | Not abstinent | 82 Participants |
Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes
Measured by dichotomous measure of whether or not any time spent incarcerated in past 6 months.56 follow-up interviews were conducted in jails, when allowed and the participant was comfortable, but we did not conduct interviews in prison. See participant flow for number of participants in prison.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Population: 330 participants were interviewed at baseline. We attempted to follow up with all participants, whether or not they stayed at the sober living house, for 6 and 12 month follow up interviews. We were not able to find all of them for follow up interviews.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | Baseline | Not incarcerated in past 6 months | 66 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | Baseline | Incarcerated in past 6 months | 83 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | 6 months | Not incarcerated in past 6 months | 94 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | 6 months | Incarcerated in past 6 months | 14 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | 12 months | Not incarcerated in past 6 months | 94 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | 12 months | Incarcerated in past 6 months | 24 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | 12 months | Not incarcerated in past 6 months | 105 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | Baseline | Not incarcerated in past 6 months | 70 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | 6 months | Incarcerated in past 6 months | 37 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | Baseline | Incarcerated in past 6 months | 111 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | 12 months | Incarcerated in past 6 months | 45 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes | 6 months | Not incarcerated in past 6 months | 108 Participants |
Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months.
Measured by whether or not the participant was worried about HIV in past 6 months.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Population: 330 participants were interviewed at baseline. We attempted to follow up with all participants, whether or not they stayed at the sober living house, for 6 and 12 month follow up interviews. We were not able to find all of them for follow up interviews.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | Baseline | Didn't have HIV worry | 25 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | Baseline | Had HIV worry | 124 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | 6 months | Didn't have HIV worry | 41 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | 6 months | Had HIV worry | 67 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | 12 months | Didn't have HIV worry | 73 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Case Management | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | 12 months | Had HIV worry | 45 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | 12 months | Didn't have HIV worry | 98 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | Baseline | Didn't have HIV worry | 48 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | 6 months | Had HIV worry | 63 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | Baseline | Had HIV worry | 133 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | 12 months | Had HIV worry | 53 Participants |
| Control/Resource Referrals | Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months. | 6 months | Didn't have HIV worry | 82 Participants |