Pulp Necrosis, Regeneration
Conditions
Keywords
Necrotic tooth pulp, Immature permanent teeth, Regeneration
Brief summary
This multi-center exploratory clinical trial is a randomized trial designed to test whether a regenerative endodontic procedure using tissue engineering principles (REGENDO), or a revascularization (REVASC) endodontic procedure, in comparison to standard apexification treatment using a mineral trioxide aggregate barrier (apexification; APEX), produces a significantly better composite clinical outcome for the treatment of immature permanent teeth with pulpal necrosis.
Detailed description
This is a multi-center randomized clinical trial designed to test whether a regenerative endodontic procedure using tissue engineering principles (REGENDO), or a revascularization (REVASC) endodontic procedure, when compared to the standard apexification treatment using mineral trioxide aggregate barrier-MTA apexification (APEX), produces a significantly better composite clinical outcome for the treatment of immature permanent teeth with pulpal necrosis. This study will use an antibiotic mixture called Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP), consisting of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline, in the tooth for disinfection of the root canal in study arms REGENDO and REVASC. The FDA has issued an Investigational New Drug (IND) number allowing use of the triple antibiotic mixture in this trial. Other dental materials used in this study have already been FDA approved for use in humans to provide a matrix for the promotion of tissue growth in the root canal space. The study will also attempt to identify the type of bacteria within the root canal space and surrounding tissues by analyzing a small sample collected on a cotton-tip applicator. This clinical trial hopes to determine which of the three treatment methods helps the tooth to grow stronger and survive for at least two years after treatment.
Interventions
USP antibiotic drugs mixed at a 1:1:1 ratio into a powder that is mixed with sterile saline to a paste-like consistency
OTHERStandard Treatment
Standard Treatment no use of study drug
Sponsors
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Loma Linda University
University of North Carolina
American Association of Endodontists
Kenneth Hargreaves
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age 6-20 * Participant has a permanent tooth with a necrotic pulp (as defined by lack of responsiveness to both electrical pulp tests and cold \[EndoIce\] tests). If the tooth was traumatized, then pulpal necrosis is defined as either: 1) no response to both electrical pulp test and cold \[EndoIce\] test by three months after trauma, or 2) presence of a periapical lesion, or 3) radiographic evidence of root resorption, or 4) discoloration of the crown. * Tooth in question is restorable (as defined by Class A or Class B using Samet and Jotkowitz classification) without the need of a stainless steel crown. * Incomplete (i.e., immature) root development defined by apical foramen ≥1.0mm (each foramina \>1.0mm for multi-rooted teeth). * At least 5 mm of root development (CEJ to radiographic apex). * Willing and able to provide informed assent/consent. * Legal guardian willing and able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* No access to telephone for study contacts. * Unable to comprehend study materials in English or Spanish. * Subject not available for follow up at 12 or 24 months. * Previous allergic response to ciprofloxacin, metronidazole or minocycline or any materials used in the study. * History of systemic diseases with altered immune function including diabetes, immunodeficiency, leukemia, Addison's or Cushing's disease. * History of taking immunosuppressants or chemotherapeutic agents including glucocorticoids in the past 3 months. * Clinical or radiographic evidence of root fracture or alveolar fracture. * Tooth in question received prior endodontic obturation. * Tooth in question has class III mobility or dens invaginatus. * Tooth in question has a history of avulsion with extra-oral dry time longer than 1 hour. * Clinical judgement (with documentation of the reason) * Radiographic or clinical identification of ankylosis (replacement resorption) or inflammatory (infection-related) root resorption.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tooth Survival | 2 years | 1\) the growth in hard tissue deposition in the radiographic root area is increased by at least 20%, and 2) the tooth survives to this time point and 3) there is no pain. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Positive pulpal response | 2 years | Comparison of treatment effects on positive pulpal responses, crown staining, preoperative factors (age, sex, history of trauma), or antimicrobial efficacy and residual intracanal microbial load would influence the primary outcome measure of tooth survival. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed