Skip to content

Intraocular Pressure and Tolerability Study of Preservative-free Prostaglandins (Bimatoprost and Latanoprost) on Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: European, Multicentric, Investigator-led, Single Masked Study

Intraocular Pressure and Tolerability Study of Preservative Free Bimatoprost 0.03% Unit Dose (BUDPF) or Preservative Free Latanoprost 0.005% Unit Dose (LUDPF) (Monoprost®) in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Glaucoma: A Randomized, Single Masked, 3 Month Cross-over, Investigator Led, European Multicentre Trial (SPORT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01975714
Acronym
SPORT
Enrollment
67
Registered
2013-11-05
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2015-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension

Keywords

Glaucoma, Ocular hypertension, Preservative-free prostaglandins

Brief summary

Bimatoprost 0.03% preservative free monodose eye drops solution (BUDPF) is a new product composed of a synthetic prostamide, bimatoprost 0.3% in a preservative free formulation. This new product is used as a once-daily topical ocular therapy for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma, or ocular hypertension, and that are sensitive to preservatives. The individual active component of BUDPF, bimatoprost is an established therapeutic agent with well documented IOP efficacy (1). Prostamides, such as bimatoprost, are believed to lower IOP mainly by increasing uveoscleral outflow. The comparator, Preservative Free Latanoprost 0.005% Unit Dose (LUDPF, eg. Monoprost®), was recently launched in a number of countries in Europe and contains latanoprost in a new preservative free formulation. It is clinically important to compare these newly entered preservative free products with respect to tolerability and efficacy. A better tolerability combined with maximum efficacy will reduce the burden of daily glaucoma therapy and provide a clear therapeutic benefit to the glaucoma patient by providing enhanced compliance and real-world IOP-lowering efficacy. The hypothesis of the study is that monodose bimatoprost is more effective than monodose latanoprost by at least 1 mmHg. (AIBILI applied for an unrestricted grant from Allergan to perform this study)

Interventions

DRUGPreservative-free latanoprost
DRUGPreservative-free bimatoprost

Sponsors

European Vision Institute Clinical Research Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 84 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

includes: * Ocular hypertension, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (XFG) or primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients that have been on a preserved prostaglandin monotherapy for at least 6 weeks. At prescreening and screening visit the IOP is less than or equal to 21 mm Hg in both eyes.

Exclusion criteria

includes: * Any ocular condition that are of safety concern, visual field defects with an MD value above -12dB, a closed/barely open anterior chamber angles or history of acute angle closure on either eye, ocular surgery within the past three months on either eye; glaucoma surgery within the past 6 months on either eye, ocular inflammation/infection occurring within three months prior to pretrial visit on either eye, pigmentary glaucoma or neovascular glaucoma on either eye, topical ocular medication that can interfere with study medication on either eye and known hypersensitivity to any component of the trial drug solutions and participation in any other clinical trial, involving an investigational drug within one month prior to pretrial visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in mean IOP values between the 2 groups at 6 months6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in IOP values IOP values, visual acuity, hyperaemia, visual acuity and tolerability between the groups in change from baselineMonth 3; Month 6

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026