Skip to content

Impact of Extent of Antral Resection on Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy

Impact of Extent of Antral Resection on Surgical Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity (A Prospective Randomized Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01974388
Acronym
LSG
Enrollment
105
Registered
2013-11-01
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2015-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Bariatric surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric leak

Brief summary

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a surgical technique that treats morbid obesity by both restrictive and hormonal action. Consecutive patients with morbid obesity treated by LSG at our department were evaluated. Patients enrolled in the study were randomized into Group I: LSG begin the division 2 cm from the pylorus and Group II: LSG begin the division 6 cm from the pylorus. The primary outcome measure was the % of excess weight loss (%EWL); secondary outcomes included operative time, day to resume oral feeding, postoperative morbidity and mortality, improvement of comorbidity.

Detailed description

This prospective randomized study was designed to compare between the beginning of sleeve gastrectomy 2 cm versus 6 cm from the pylorus with special regards to intraoperative problems, weight loss, improvement of comorbidities, postoperative complications, nutritional and elemental deficiencies. Consecutive patients, who were treated for morbid obesity by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the department of general surgery, Mansoura University, Egypt, during the period from January 2008 to January 2012, were eligible for the study. The exclusion criteria included patients above 60 or below 18 years old, history of upper laparotomy, unfit for anaesthesia or laparoscopy, major psychological instability, and drug abuse. The operation was done under general anesthesia. Patient was in supine position with splitting of the operating table legs.Gastric transection started 2 cm proximal to the pylorus using 60 mm, green endo-stapler (Ethicon, USA) (GI) or 6 cm from the pylorus (G II). The following staplers were placed approximately 1 cm from the bougie in the direction of the gastroesophageal junction. Group I: LSG begin the division 2 cm from the pylorus and Group II: LSG begin the division 6 cm from the pylorus. The primary outcome measure was the % of excess weight loss (%EWL); secondary outcomes included operative time, day to resume oral feeding, postoperative morbidity and mortality, improvement of comorbidity.

Interventions

PROCEDURELSG started 2 cm from the pylorus

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy started 2 cm from pylorus

PROCEDURELSG started 6 cm from pylorus

LSG started 6 cm from pylorus

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients, who were treated for morbid obesity by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)

Exclusion criteria

* patients above 60 or below 18 years old, history of upper laparotomy, unfit for anaesthesia or laparoscopy, major psychological instability, and drug abuse.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
percent of excess weight lossone year postoperativeThe percent of EWL was calculated as follows: \[(preoperative weight-follow up weight)/preoperative excess weight\] ×100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
length of postoperative stay30 dayslength of postoperative stay
postoperative complicationsone year postoperativegastric leakage, internal haemorrhage, pulmonary complications). Complications were graded according to their severity on a validated five point scale using Dindo-Clavien complication classification system) into (grades I, II, IIIa-b, IVa-b, V). Grade I (no need for specific intervention), grade II (need for drug therapy such antibiotics, blood transfusion, total parenteral nutrition), grade IIIa-b (need for invasive therapy radiological, endoscopic or surgical), grade IVa-b (organ dysfunction requiring ICU stay and management), grade V (death)
weight regainone year postoperativean increase of body weight of more than 10 kg from the nadir
Resolution of comorbidityone year postoperativeResolution of comorbidity was considered if the disease is controlled without any medications.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026