Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Vaccine, ASP0113, in Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-Seronegative Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving an Organ From a CMV-Seropositive Donor

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Vaccine, ASP0113, in Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-Seronegative Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving an Organ From a CMV-Seropositive Donor

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01974206
Enrollment
150
Registered
2013-11-01
Start date
2013-11-20
Completion date
2020-11-05
Last updated
2024-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplantation Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Negative Recipients

Keywords

ASP0113, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Kidney Transplantation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ASP0113 compared to placebo in reducing the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in CMV-seronegative subjects receiving a kidney from a CMV-seropositive donor. This study also evaluated the safety of ASP0113 in this patient population.

Detailed description

Participants were followed for one year after first study drug injection. This was the primary study period. Participants were followed for 4.5 years after completion of the primary study to assess long-term safety of the vaccine.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALASP0113

intramuscular injection

DRUGPlacebo

intramuscular injection

Sponsors

Vical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* CMV negative subject having received a CMV seropositive kidney (living or deceased) * Participant started valganciclovir or ganciclovir within 10 days of transplant and had received it through Randomization.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant underwent a course of CMV-specific prophylactic therapy with antiviral drugs with a duration of greater than 100 days. * Participant had received from one month prior to transplant or planned to receive CMV immunoglobulin. * Participant had CMV viremia or CMV disease from time of transplant until time of Randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With CMV Viremia Through 1 Year Post First Study Drug InjectionFrom first study dose injection (day 1) up to one year post study drug injection (up to Day 380)CMV viremia was defined as presence of cytomegalovirus as measured in plasma viral load of ≥ 1000 IU/mL by central laboratory assay. A participant who discontinued the study without a positive CMV viral load was imputed as having a CMV viremia. A participant who had more than one viral load ≥ 1000 IU/mL by central assay was counted once in this summary. CMV viral loads after first injection (Day 1) through Day 380 (scheduled or unscheduled) were included in the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated CMV-Associated Disease, Including CMV Syndrome and CMV Tissue-Invasive Disease (Primary Study Period)From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one (up to Day 380) year post study drug injectionAn independent panel of medical experts reviewed/adjudicated events of CMV-associated disease including CMV syndrome and tissue invasive disease, which were defined according to the American Society of Transplantation Recommendations for Screening, Monitoring and Reporting of Infectious Complications in Immunosuppression Trials in Recipients of Organ Transplantation 2006.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Viral Load ≥ The Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) Assessed by Central Laboratory (Primary Study Period)From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one year post study drug injection (up to Day 380)The central laboratory had the LLOQ level for CMV viral load assessment. When the viral load was below the LLOQ the actual reading was not possible and was denoted as ≤LLOQ. If the participant had any CMV viral load assessments greater than the LLOQ, set up by the central laboratory, participant was classified as viremic and was included in the analysis.
Percentage of Participants Who Took Adjudicated CMV-specific Antiviral Therapy for the Treatment of CMV Viremia or Disease (Primary Study Period)From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one year post study drug injection (up to Day 380)An independent panel of medical experts reviewed/adjudicated events of CMV-specific AVT for treatment of CMV viremia or disease.
Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Primary Study Period)From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one year post study drug injection (up to Day 380)Graft survival was defined for any participant that did not fit the definition of graft loss. Graft loss was defined as participant death, re-transplant, nephrectomy, or return to permanent dialysis (i.e., for \> 30 days). Missing values for graft survival were not included in the denominator when making the proportion. The analysis population was the FAS.
Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Month 18, 30, 42, 54, and 66Graft survival was defined for any participant that did not fit the definition of graft loss. Graft loss was defined as participant death, re-transplant, nephrectomy, or return to permanent dialysis (i.e., for \> 30 days). Missing values for graft survival were not included in the denominator when making the proportion.

Countries

Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 150 participants were enrolled into the study from 6 countries. Eligible participants were ≥18 years of age, CMV-seronegative at the time of the transplant and had a kidney allograft from a CMV-seropositive living or deceased donor. After the primary period completion, 149 participants entered the long-term follow-up period.

Pre-assignment details

Screening assessments were performed from 14-30 days after the transplant. Participants were randomized at day 30 in relation to the day of the transplant, in a 1:1 ratio to ASP0113 or placebo. Participants were stratified by the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) prior to randomization and by the receipt of a kidney from a living or deceased donor.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received 1 mL of 5 mg/mL of placebo via injection in the deltoid muscle alternating sides with each dose on days 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 in relation to the day of transplant (Day 0).
74
ASP0113
Participants received 1 mL of 5 mg/mL of ASP0113 via injection in the deltoid muscle alternating sides with each dose on days 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 in relation to the day of transplant (Day 0).
76
Total150

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyDid Not Take Study Drug01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalASP0113
Age, Continuous47.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
49.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
50.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants72 Participants70 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
72 Participants78 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants25 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
57 Participants118 Participants61 Participants
Randomization Strata
Deceased Donor & ATG Use = No
26 Participants53 Participants27 Participants
Randomization Strata
Deceased Donor & ATG Use = Yes
22 Participants44 Participants22 Participants
Randomization Strata
Living Donor & ATG Use = No
18 Participants34 Participants16 Participants
Randomization Strata
Living Donor & ATG Use = Yes
8 Participants18 Participants10 Participants
Randomization Strata
Not Recorded
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants40 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants110 Participants55 Participants
Source of Current Transplant
DECEASED DONOR
48 Participants97 Participants49 Participants
Source of Current Transplant
LIVING RELATED DONOR
16 Participants25 Participants9 Participants
Source of Current Transplant
LIVING UNRELATED DONOR
10 Participants27 Participants17 Participants
Source of Current Transplant
Not Recorded
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Use of ATG
No
44 Participants88 Participants44 Participants
Use of ATG
Yes
30 Participants62 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 747 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 7475 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
36 / 7444 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With CMV Viremia Through 1 Year Post First Study Drug Injection

CMV viremia was defined as presence of cytomegalovirus as measured in plasma viral load of ≥ 1000 IU/mL by central laboratory assay. A participant who discontinued the study without a positive CMV viral load was imputed as having a CMV viremia. A participant who had more than one viral load ≥ 1000 IU/mL by central assay was counted once in this summary. CMV viral loads after first injection (Day 1) through Day 380 (scheduled or unscheduled) were included in the analysis.

Time frame: From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one year post study drug injection (up to Day 380)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and who had at least 1 post dose viral load assessment within 1 year post first injection by central laboratory.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With CMV Viremia Through 1 Year Post First Study Drug InjectionKnown CMV viremia35.6 Percentage of Paticipants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With CMV Viremia Through 1 Year Post First Study Drug InjectionImputed CMV viremia due to discontinuation5.5 Percentage of Paticipants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With CMV Viremia Through 1 Year Post First Study Drug InjectionKnown CMV viremia35.6 Percentage of Paticipants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With CMV Viremia Through 1 Year Post First Study Drug InjectionImputed CMV viremia due to discontinuation0 Percentage of Paticipants
Comparison: The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) estimate of the common odds ratio (ASP0113 vs placebo) stratified by randomization strata, and the 90% CIs of the CMH odds ratio stratified by randomization group.p-value: 0.30790% CI: [0.43, 1.47]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Took Adjudicated CMV-specific Antiviral Therapy for the Treatment of CMV Viremia or Disease (Primary Study Period)

An independent panel of medical experts reviewed/adjudicated events of CMV-specific AVT for treatment of CMV viremia or disease.

Time frame: From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one year post study drug injection (up to Day 380)

Population: The analysis population was the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Took Adjudicated CMV-specific Antiviral Therapy for the Treatment of CMV Viremia or Disease (Primary Study Period)45.21 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Adjudicated CMV-specific Antiviral Therapy for the Treatment of CMV Viremia or Disease (Primary Study Period)42.47 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: The exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) estimate of the common odds ratio (ASP0113 vs placebo) stratified by randomization group, and the 90% CI of the exact CMH odds ratio stratified by randomization group.p-value: 0.41990% CI: [0.48, 1.61]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated CMV-Associated Disease, Including CMV Syndrome and CMV Tissue-Invasive Disease (Primary Study Period)

An independent panel of medical experts reviewed/adjudicated events of CMV-associated disease including CMV syndrome and tissue invasive disease, which were defined according to the American Society of Transplantation Recommendations for Screening, Monitoring and Reporting of Infectious Complications in Immunosuppression Trials in Recipients of Organ Transplantation 2006.

Time frame: From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one (up to Day 380) year post study drug injection

Population: The analysis population was the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated CMV-Associated Disease, Including CMV Syndrome and CMV Tissue-Invasive Disease (Primary Study Period)19.18 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated CMV-Associated Disease, Including CMV Syndrome and CMV Tissue-Invasive Disease (Primary Study Period)19.18 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: The exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) estimate of the common odds ratio (ASP0113 vs placebo) stratified by randomization group, and the 90% CI of the exact CMH odds ratio stratified by randomization group.p-value: 0.57690% CI: [0.46, 2.15]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)

Graft survival was defined for any participant that did not fit the definition of graft loss. Graft loss was defined as participant death, re-transplant, nephrectomy, or return to permanent dialysis (i.e., for \> 30 days). Missing values for graft survival were not included in the denominator when making the proportion.

Time frame: Month 18, 30, 42, 54, and 66

Population: All participants who entered long-term follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 3083.8 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 5478.4 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 4285.1 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 6682.4 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 1891.9 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 6684.2 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 1894.7 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 3081.6 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 4280.3 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Long-term Follow up)Long Term Follow Up Month 5477.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Primary Study Period)

Graft survival was defined for any participant that did not fit the definition of graft loss. Graft loss was defined as participant death, re-transplant, nephrectomy, or return to permanent dialysis (i.e., for \> 30 days). Missing values for graft survival were not included in the denominator when making the proportion. The analysis population was the FAS.

Time frame: From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one year post study drug injection (up to Day 380)

Population: The analysis population was the FAS, with data available.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Primary Study Period)98.53 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With Graft Survival (Primary Study Period)100 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common odds ratio could not be calculated as 100% of ASP0113 group showed graft survival, and this leads to having a value of 0 for the denominator for the ratio thus odds ratio is not estimable. The 90% CI (2-sided) values for the odds ratio are 0.11 to NA, where NA is an infinity value.p-value: 0.5Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma Viral Load ≥ The Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) Assessed by Central Laboratory (Primary Study Period)

The central laboratory had the LLOQ level for CMV viral load assessment. When the viral load was below the LLOQ the actual reading was not possible and was denoted as ≤LLOQ. If the participant had any CMV viral load assessments greater than the LLOQ, set up by the central laboratory, participant was classified as viremic and was included in the analysis.

Time frame: From first study dose injection (day 1) up to one year post study drug injection (up to Day 380)

Population: The analysis population was the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Plasma Viral Load ≥ The Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) Assessed by Central Laboratory (Primary Study Period)49.32 Percentage of Participants
ASP0113 5mgPercentage of Participants With Plasma Viral Load ≥ The Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) Assessed by Central Laboratory (Primary Study Period)46.58 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: The exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) estimate of the common odds ratio (ASP0113 vs placebo) stratified by randomization group, and the 90% CI of the exact CMH odds ratio stratified by randomization group.p-value: 0.40890% CI: [0.48, 1.59]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026