Skip to content

Using Ultrasound to Predict the Results of Draining Pleural Effusions

Correlation of Pleural Manometry With Real-time Thoracic Ultrasound, Symptomatic Benefit and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Pleural Effusion: a Pilot Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01973985
Enrollment
2
Registered
2013-11-01
Start date
2014-08-01
Completion date
2017-05-16
Last updated
2018-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pleural Effusion

Keywords

Pleural Effusion

Brief summary

Pleural effusion is an extremely common problem with multiple causes; its subsequent investigation with thoracocentesis and treatment with drainage represent two of the most frequently performed diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures. The role of thoracic ultrasonography in the management of pleural effusion is a modern and rapidly expanding one, having become effectively mandatory and part of the gold standard over the past decade due to its diagnostic and patient safety benefits. By contrast, the measurement of intra-pleural pressure using sequential manometry has failed to convincingly demonstrate its clinical value beyond physiological studies despite its availability for over a century. Previous work has shown a potential role for pleural manometry in predicting the presence of un-expandable lung and success of talc pleurodesis but these studies have not been replicated or clinically validated. We intend to combine the old and new in an observational study comparing findings on thoracic ultrasonography and pleural manometry during thoracocentesis with patient-reported symptoms and the key clinical outcomes of presence of un-expandable lung and success of talc pleurodesis. The investigators hypothesise that the previously described variations in pleural elastance can be correlated with appearances and anatomical changes visualised on thoracic ultrasonography; and in combination can be reliably utilised to predict clinical outcome. The study may allow the proposal of a treatment algorithm that allows patients with pleural effusion to be managed in a more expeditious and efficient manner.

Detailed description

Study-specific interventions will be the monitoring of intrapleural pressure using an electronic pleural manometer (Mirador Biomedical CompassTM Thoracentesis Assist Device) and thoracic ultrasonography. Both of these are considered non-invasive and low-risk to the study participants. As part of their standard usual clinical care, participants will undergo a diagnostic and/or therapeutic pleural intervention in the form of thoracocentesis or pleural aspiration; intercostal chest drain insertion; and/or talc pleurodesis. All of these procedures are invasive and associated with potential complications that participants will be informed about as part of standard informed consent procedures. These interventions will however be clinically indicated and carried out whether or not an individual chooses to participate in this study. For those individuals who do participate in the study, any complications of these standard clinical care procedures will be recorded as part of the data collection process for the study.

Interventions

Intrapleural pressure will be monitored with the use of an electronic pleural manometer (Mirador Biomedical CompassTM Thoracentesis Assist Device).

OTHERThoracic ultrasonography

Thoracic ultrasound scan will be done before drainage of pleural effusion - all participants. Thoracic ultrasound scans will also be done during drainage of pleural effusion and the results will be recorded after every 100mL of pleural fluid drained - all participants. Thoracic ultrasound scan will be done after drainage of pleural effusion - all participants. Thoracic ultrasound scan will also be be done during clinic follow-up as part of routine clinical care - all participants.

PROCEDUREPleural aspiration catheter OR chest drain (standard care)

Insertion of pleural aspiration catheter OR intercostal chest drain under ultrasound guidance - all participants (standard care).

PROCEDURETalc slurry pleurodesis via chest drain (standard care)

Talc slurry pleurodesis via intercostal chest drain where/when clinically indicated as part of routine clinical care participants with intercostal chest drain only (standard care).

Sponsors

University of Oxford
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * Adult male or female, aged 18 years or above. * Diagnosed with a symptomatic pleural effusion requiring either diagnostic and/or therapeutic pleural aspiration or drainage. * Expectation by the clinician responsible for assessing the patient that more than 500mL of pleural fluid will be drained on this particular occasion.

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 years * Inability to provide informed consent * Evidence of significant septation or loculation within the pleural effusion as determined by the clinician responsible for assessing the patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnosis of unexpandable lungUp to 3 monthsClinical and/or radiological diagnosis of unexpandable lung

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failure of talc pleurodesis3 monthsFailure of talc pleurodesis (defined as the need for a further repeat pleural procedure for symptom relief within 3 months of attempted pleurodesis).
Absolute change in patient-reported symptomsUp to 3 monthsAbsolute change in patient-reported symptoms (dyspnoea and chest discomfort) during pleural aspiration or drainage as measured using a visual analogue scale.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026