Skip to content

Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture

Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Retrograde Nailing

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01973712
Enrollment
94
Registered
2013-10-31
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2021-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distal Femur Fractures, Periprosthetic Fractures

Brief summary

A periprosthetic distal femur fracture is a fracture close to a knee implant. This type of fracture is often difficult to fix because of the close proximity of the two surgical implants which can sometimes interfere with proper bone healing. Improper healing can cause significant impairment and sometimes requires additional surgeries to correct the problem. Despite considerable interest and research put into developing techniques to repair this fracture surgeons do not know which is the best way to treat this type of fracture. Our multicentre orthopaedic study group is conducting this study to compare two standard, but different treatments for periprosthetic distal femur fractures. One treatment consists of open surgery and the placement of a plate and screws along the side of the femur. The other consists of implanting an intramedullary nail in the femur. The goal of this study is to directly compare the two treatments to see if one treatment results in better patient outcomes than the other.

Interventions

PROCEDURELocked Compression Plating
PROCEDURERetrograde Intramedullary Nailing (RIMN)

Sponsors

Unity Health Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 18 years and older Displaced periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur Fracture amenable to both treatment groups, in the opinion of the investigator Knee prosthesis is well-fixed and non-stemmed Open box femoral component Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Presence of an active infection around the fracture (soft tissue or bone) Open fracture Injury Severity Score (ISS) \> 15 or any associated major injuries of the lower extremities Medical contraindication to surgery Pregnant women Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed Up and Go (TUG) test3 monthsThe TUG is a very simple timed test that was introduced in 1991 to measure mobility in the elderly. It involves documenting the time, in seconds, taken for subjects to rise from a standard arm chair, walk to a line on the floor 3 meters away, turn, return, and sit down again

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rates of re-operation12 months

Other

MeasureTime frame
Rates of malunion12 months

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactMilena Vicente, RN, CCRP
vicentem@smh.ca416-864-6060

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026