Skip to content

Healthy Bones Study

Healthy Bones Study: An Intervention to Improve Healthy Bone Behaviours in Prostate Cancer Patients on Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01973673
Enrollment
200
Registered
2013-10-31
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2017-03-01
Last updated
2017-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Locally Advanced Malignant Neoplasm

Keywords

prostate cancer, ADT, bone health

Brief summary

Prostate cancer patients receiving hormone treatment (androgen deprivation therapy, or ADT) are at increased risk of developing bone loss and osteoporosis as side effects. To prevent this, guidelines recommend participation in healthy bone behaviours including weight-bearing exercise and adequate calcium/vitamin D intake. However, prior studies have shown that patients are not regularly screened or counselled regarding healthy bone behaviours while receiving ADT. Maintaining bone health in prostate cancer patients is important because men on ADT are at increased risk of fractures. In this study, the investigators will examine whether an intervention designed to improve healthy bone behaviours among prostate cancer patients on ADT can be implemented. The intervention consists of a written healthy bones prescription, brief verbal counseling, and printed educational materials for participants. Investigators hope to obtain an initial estimate of whether the intervention works. They also hope to show that this simple intervention can be implemented in a real, working cancer clinic. The investigators hypothesize that an intervention to improve bone health in prostate cancer patients receiving ADT (healthy bones prescription, verbal counseling, and printed educational materials) is effective, implementable, and accepted by clinicians and patients.

Detailed description

The study has a before-and-after design, to allow comparison of the intervention before its implementation and after its implementation. This design permits a reliable assessment of baseline characteristics prior to implementation of intervention and over time, particularly in situations where randomization is not feasible (e.g. due to contamination of treating physicians). The point at which the intervention will start to be delivered for new study participants is when 150 patients are accrued to the Before arm. 1. Before/control arm (Before arm) Usual care by Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) oncologist. 2. After/intervention arm (After arm) Provision of a healthy bones prescription, verbal counselling, and written educational materials regarding healthy bone behaviours by PM oncologist or delegate (e.g. clinical fellow), in addition to usual care by oncologist. The intervention may be delivered again at a subsequent follow-up at the request of the patient and/or at the discretion of the oncologist.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBone health educational materials

Sponsors

Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Prostate cancer patients receiving ADT at study entry (for a maximum of 12 months prior to study entry or planning to receive ADT within 3 weeks of study entry), for an expected duration of \>6 months; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \<3

Exclusion criteria

Unable to exercise (e.g. major physical disability, severe osteoarthritis, or other severe comorbidity); severe cardiac disease (congestive heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class \>2, angioplasty/coronary artery bypass surgery within 3 months of study entry); patients with bone endocrinopathy (parathyroid disorders, osteomalacia); stage IV-V chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \<30 mL/min/1.75 m2; prior serum creatinine not required for entry into study); allergy to components of calcium & vitamin D tablets.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment rate6 monthsProportion of eligible and consented patients who complete study follow-up, as a measure of study feasibility
Study completion and retention rate3 monthsChange in patient-reported daily calcium intake, as a measure of intervention efficacy
Intervention efficacy3 monthsChange in patient-reported weekly exercise duration, as a measure of intervention efficacy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical outcome6 monthsProportion of patients whose calcium, vitamin D intake, and exercise may be assessed from properly completed questionnaires
BMD monitoring6 monthsProportion of enrolled patients having bone mineral density (BMD) tests performed within 6 months of ADT initiation
Clinical outcome capture rate6 monthsPatient and clinician satisfaction with clinical study on a ten-point scale
Questionnaire, and Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale3 monthsChange in patient knowledge and health benefits regarding osteoporosis, as determined with Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz - Revised, Men's Osteoporosis Knowledge

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026