Skip to content

This Was a Multinational Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Two Medicines , Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Taken Together, or Separately, or a Mock Treatment (Placebo) in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Combinations of Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Monotherapy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01972841
Acronym
SYNERGY
Enrollment
3527
Registered
2013-10-31
Start date
2013-11-05
Completion date
2015-10-22
Last updated
2024-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder, Urgency Incontinence, Urinary Bladder Diseases\Urologic Diseases, Urinary Bladder Overactive

Keywords

Combination Therapy, Mirabegron, Overactive Bladder, Urgency, Urinary Incontinence, Nocturia, Solifenacin Succinate

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to examine how well two medicines (solifenacin succinate and mirabegron) combined work compared to each medicine alone in the treatment of bladder problems.

Interventions

DRUGSolifenacin succinate

Oral tablet

DRUGMirabegron

Oral tablet

DRUGPlacebo to match solifenacin succinate

Oral tablet

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject was willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly and able to measure his/her vital signs at home at stipulated time points, using the device provided by the study personnel, and to adequately record the readings; * Subject had symptoms of wet OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for at least 3 months;

Exclusion criteria

* Subject had significant PVR volume (\> 150 mL); * Subject had a neurological cause for detrusor overactivity (e.g. neurogenic bladder, diabetic neuropathy with autonomic component or bladder involvement, or systemic or central neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease with autonomic component or bladder involvement). An autonomic component could be inferred when autonomic functions were affected, including heart rate, blood pressure, perspiration and digestion. * Subject had an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self catheterization. * Subject had chronic inflammation such as bladder pain syndrome /interstitial cystitis, symptomatic bladder stones or any previous or current radiation cystitis. * Subject had received intravesical treatment in the past 12 months with e.g., botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, capsaicin. * Subject had moderate to severe hepatic impairment * Subject had severe renal impairment * Subject had a clinically significant abnormal ECG * Subject had a concurrent malignancy or history of cancer (except noninvasive skin cancer) within the last 5 years prior to screening. * Subject had an average QTcF interval \> 450 ms for males or \> 470 ms for females based on the triplicate ECGs completed at Screening or is at risk of QT prolongation (e.g., family history of long QT syndrome, hypokalaemia). * Subject had severe hypertension, which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg and/or average diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)A micturition was defined as any voluntary micturition (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from the data recorded by the participant during 3 consecutive days with volume measurements during the 7-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother ScoreBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consisted of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The TS-VAS was a visual analogue scale which asked participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Number of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The number of incontinence episodes was calculated as the total number of incontinence episodes on valid diary days recorded during the 7-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition FrequencyBaseline and Week 12Corrected micturition frequency was defined as the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours that participants had at end of treatment if their fluid intake had remained unchanged since baseline.
Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The number of urgency incontinence episodes was the number of times a participant recorded an urgency incontinence episode on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)An urgency episode was a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which was difficult to defer; it was recorded when a micturition or incontinence episode was recorded and the severity of urinary urgency recorded was 3 (severe urgency) or 4 (urgency incontinence) according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS). The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Number of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant went to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the patients got up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The number of nocturia episodes was the number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24hr was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Number of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8 and 12 (up to 12 weeks)The number of pads used was the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EOT (up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 (up to 12 weeks)The mean number of pads used per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Number of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The number of incontinence-free days with \< 8 micturitions per day was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded and with \< 8 micturitions per day.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, EoT (up to 12 weeks)The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion in the OAB-q (seen in this outcome measure) consisted of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion in the OAB-q (seen in this outcome measure) consisted of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), scored 1-6. The total HRQoL score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The Coping score was calculated by adding 8 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The Concern score was calculated by adding 7 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The Sleep score was calculated by adding 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The Social score was calculated by adding 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).
PGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).
Change From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionBaseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedBaseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The WPAI:SHP was a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes were expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingBaseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentBaseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentBaseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASBaseline and week 4, 8 and 12The TS-VAS was a visual analogue scale which asked participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants with zero incontinence episodes per 24 hours postbaseline in the last 3 days prior to weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants with ≥ 10 points improvement from baseline to each visit (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants with ≥ 10 points improvement from baseline to each visit (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants with ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours at each time point (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).
Percentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8 , 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants with micturition frequency normalization was defined as any participant who had ≥ 8 micturitions/24 hours at baseline and \< 8 micturitions/24 h postbaseline at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants with zero incontinence episodes per 24 hours postbaseline in the last 7 days prior to weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants with ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants with a major (≥ 2 points) improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q Symptom Bother score at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q HRQL total score at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants considered as triple responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline, minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q Symptom Bother score, and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The percentage of participants considered as triple responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per24 hours compared to baseline, minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the HRQL total score, and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose of double-blind study drug up to 30 days after last dose of double-blind study drug (up to 16 weeks)A TEAE refered to an adverse event (AE; defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or who had undergone study procedures and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment) which started or worsened in the period from first double-blind medication intake until 14 days after the last double-blind medication intake. Serious TEAEs with a start date reported until 30 days after the last double-blind medication intake were also summarized as TEAEs, and also included serious TEAEs upgraded by the sponsor based on review of the sponsor's list of Always Serious terms if any upgrade was done. Drug-related TEAEs may be possible or probable, as assessed by the investigator, or records where relationship is missing.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)PVR volume was assessed by ultrasonography or a bladder scanner.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax (time to maximum concentration) window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.
Number of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8,12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The number of days with \< 8 micturitions was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with less than 8 micturitions per day.
Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.
Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.
Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowBaseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.
Number of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)The number of incontinence-free days was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients who had symptoms of wet overactive bladder (OAB) (urgency, urinary frequency and urgency incontinence) for ≥ 3 months were enrolled at 435 centers in 42 countries. Eligible participants went into a single-blind, 4-week placebo run-in period and completed a micturition diary the last 7 days prior to each study visit.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 6991 participants were screened, 6275 participants received placebo run-in treatment and 3527 participants were randomized into 1 of 6 treatment arms in a 1:1:1:1:2:2 ratio in the 12-week double-blind treatment period. A total of 953 participants were also enrolled in an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) substudy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants who received matching placebo once a day for 12 weeks.
447
Mirabegron 25 mg
Participants who received mirabegron 25 mg once a day for 12 weeks.
441
Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants who received mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 12 weeks.
437
Solifenacin 5 mg
Participants who received solifenacin 5 mg once a day for 12 weeks.
434
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
Participants who received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once a day for 12 weeks.
885
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants who received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 12 weeks.
883
Total3,527

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event1381292126
Overall StudyDid not have end of treatment page000010
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy100241
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up424293
Overall StudyMiscellaneous004104
Overall StudyProtocol Violation223594
Overall StudyRandomized but Never Received Treatment2542613
Overall StudyWithdrawal by participants212723163334

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Age, Continuous57.46 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
56.77 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46
56.69 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.28
57.88 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.92
56.94 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.78
57.3 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46
57.16 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.42
Mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h3.41 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.37
3.42 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
3.18 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.47
3.58 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.51
3.22 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.17
3.16 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.08
3.29 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.29
Mean number of micturitions/24 h10.97 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.86
10.81 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.63
11.19 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.27
10.76 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.47
10.73 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.88
10.74 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.36
10.84 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.73
Mean number of nocturia episodes/24 h1.57 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06
1.53 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02
1.59 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.09
1.59 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
1.56 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07
1.52 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97
1.56 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03
Mean number of pads used/24 h2.87 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99
2.86 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
2.62 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.18
2.87 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.14
2.50 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.58
2.58 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39
2.67 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.76
Mean number of urgency episodes (Grade 3 or 4)/24 h6.52 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.05
6.22 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.89
6.46 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.88
6.48 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88
6.22 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
6.22 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.56
6.32 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.92
Mean number of urgency incontinence episodes/24 h3.14 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.23
3.00 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.09
2.89 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31
3.23 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.34
2.85 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81
2.80 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.64
2.94 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Mean volume voided per micturition157.94 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 58.78
152.46 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.96
155.31 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.78
151.94 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.29
159.32 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 58.29
153.57 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.67
155.43 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.49
Number of incontinence episodes/week23.6 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6
23.5 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6
21.7 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.8
24.8 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.5
22.1 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.7
21.7 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.3
22.7 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.7
Number of nocturia episodes/week10.9 nocturia episode
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
10.6 nocturia episode
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
11.0 nocturia episode
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
11.0 nocturia episode
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
10.8 nocturia episode
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
10.5 nocturia episode
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
10.8 nocturia episode
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Number of pads used/week19.8 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.9
19.6 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
17.9 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.7
19.9 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8
17.1 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.7
17.7 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
19.3 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
Number of urgency incontinence episodes/week21.7 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.6
20.6 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.4
19.8 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.7
22.4 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.3
19.5 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
19.2 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
20.3 urgency incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
345 Participants343 Participants338 Participants342 Participants686 Participants684 Participants2738 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
102 Participants98 Participants99 Participants92 Participants199 Participants199 Participants789 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4290 / 4230 / 4220 / 4230 / 8530 / 848
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 42917 / 42314 / 42225 / 42372 / 85360 / 848
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 4296 / 4235 / 4223 / 42312 / 85319 / 848

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS comprised all RAS patients who took ≥ 1 dose of double-blind treatment after randomization, reported ≥ 1 micturition in the baseline diary and ≥ 1 micturition postbaseline, reported ≥ 1 incontinence episode in the baseline diary and excluded participants from one site. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.34 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.70 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.76 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.79 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-2.04 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.98 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.07295% CI: [-0.49, -0.01]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.03395% CI: [-0.44, 0.04]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 25 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.58, -0.1]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 50 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.05295% CI: [-0.47, 0.01]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

A micturition was defined as any voluntary micturition (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.64 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-2.00 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-2.03 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-2.20 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-2.49 micturitionsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-2.59 micturitionsStandard Error 0.08
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-0.57, -0.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-0.67, -0.11]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 25 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.76, -0.21]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 50 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.84, -0.28]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency

Corrected micturition frequency was defined as the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours that participants had at end of treatment if their fluid intake had remained unchanged since baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency0.15 micturitionsStandard Error 0.24
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency-0.17 micturitionsStandard Error 0.24
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency-0.97 micturitionsStandard Error 0.24
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency-1.28 micturitionsStandard Error 0.24
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency-1.10 micturitionsStandard Error 0.17
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency-1.52 micturitionsStandard Error 0.17
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.5295% CI: [-0.39, 0.76]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.41395% CI: [-0.82, 0.34]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-1.5, -0.34]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.0695% CI: [-1.13, 0.02]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/Depression

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> not anxious42 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> moderately anxious5 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> not anxious7 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> moderately anxious7 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> extremely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> slightly anx49 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> no data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> slightly anxious4 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> moderately anxious17 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> severely anxious2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> severely anxious4 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> not anxious2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> not anxious9 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> severely anxious10 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> slightly anxious3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> moderately anxious1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> moderately anxious17 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> severely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> severely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> slightly anxious2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> severely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> slightly anxious19 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> no data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> not anxious12 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> slightly anxious42 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> not anxious157 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> moderately anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> moderately anxious7 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> not anxious5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> severely anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> slightly anxious3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> severely anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> severely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> no data3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> moderately anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> not anxious60 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> slightly anxious27 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> slightly anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> slightly anx40 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> moderately anxious16 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> not anxious8 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> severely anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> no data3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> not anxious13 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> moderately anxious6 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> severely anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> slightly anxious17 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> moderately anxious7 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> not anxious176 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> moderately anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> severely anxious3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> slightly anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> not anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> no data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> no data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> not anxious12 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> severely anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> moderately anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> slightly anxious19 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> moderately anxious6 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> moderately anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> severely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> moderately anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> moderately anxious11 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> severely anxious5 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> not anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> severely anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> not anxious187 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> severely anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> moderately anxious12 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> slightly anxious4 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> not anxious3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> severely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> slightly anxious25 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> extremely anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> slightly anx45 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> not anxious6 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> no data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> slightly anxious2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> slightly anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> not anxious54 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> not anxious166 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> slightly anxious29 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> moderately anxious8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> severely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> not anxious59 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> slightly anx40 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> moderately anxious17 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> severely anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> no data5 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> not anxious22 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> slightly anxious14 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> moderately anxious10 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> severely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> not anxious6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> slightly anxious5 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> moderately anxious6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> severely anxious5 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> not anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> slightly anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> moderately anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> severely anxious3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> not anxious6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> slightly anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> moderately anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> severely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> extremely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> slightly anxious43 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> moderately anxious18 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> slightly anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> slightly anxious45 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> not anxious13 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> not anxious42 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> slightly anx79 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> not anxious122 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> severely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> slightly anxious6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> no data3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> no data3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> not anxious360 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> moderately anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> moderately anxious18 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> extremely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> severely anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> severely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> not anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> severely anxious5 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> moderately anxious6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> severely anxious8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> severely anxious5 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> slightly anxious11 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> moderately anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> not anxious12 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> moderately anxious13 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> moderately anxious11 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> not anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> severely anxious7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> slightly anxious3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> moderately anxious23 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> slightly anxious41 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> slightly anxious50 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> moderately anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> not anxious35 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> severely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> no data4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> extremely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> extremely anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> severely anxious5 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> extremely anxious0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionExtremely anxious -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> moderately anxious16 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> slightly anx65 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> not anxious14 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSlightly anxious -> not anxious134 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> not anxious370 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> slightly anxious3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> no data6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> extremely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> moderately anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNot anxious -> severely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> severely anxious2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> moderately anxious7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> slightly anxious6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> extremely anxious3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionSeverely anxious -> not anxious8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionNo data -> severely anxious1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/DepressionModerately anxious -> no data3 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/Discomfort

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort53 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort8 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort10 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort54 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomf0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> slight pain/discomfort2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> exteme pain/discomfort2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort12 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort4 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no pain/discomfort11 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort4 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discom.0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomf31 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort23 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort20 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort38 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort131 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> moderate pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort4 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort4 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort4 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no data3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> moderate pain/discomfort4 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort51 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort29 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> slight pain/discomfort2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort49 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort11 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no pain/discomfort5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> exteme pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no data5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort14 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort9 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort15 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomf13 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort175 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discom.2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomf0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no data4 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort24 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> moderate pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomf0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort20 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort17 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discom.1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort6 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomf16 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort153 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort14 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort6 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no pain/discomfort3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> exteme pain/discomfort1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort37 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort45 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> slight pain/discomfort2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort44 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort154 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort33 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort13 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no data2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort46 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort47 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort18 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> exteme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no data2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort23 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort22 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomf15 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomf0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort11 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discom.0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no pain/discomfort6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> slight pain/discomfort2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> moderate pain/discomfort2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort46 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort15 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort74 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no pain/discomfort14 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort45 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort94 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort117 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> slight pain/discomfort6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomf1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no data3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no data2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort290 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> moderate pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomf34 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> exteme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort15 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort11 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discom.1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort19 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomf0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort20 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomf40 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort45 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort51 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discom.1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort46 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no data4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> exteme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortExtreme pain/discomfort -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort19 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort101 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no pain/discomfort14 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSlight pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort105 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort317 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> slight pain/discomfort3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> no data8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> moderate pain/discomfort3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort11 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortSevere pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort12 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortNo data -> severe pain/discomfort0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/DiscomfortModerate pain/discomfort -> no data1 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-Care

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no problems13 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> severe problems2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> moderate problems2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no data4 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> slight problems10 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no problems17 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> unable to w/d0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> severe problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no problems311 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> severe problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> moderate problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> slight problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> slight problems21 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> moderate problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> severe problems3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> moderate problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> slight problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> moderate problems9 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> slight problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no problems2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> severe problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> severe problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> moderate problems9 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> slight problems3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no problems6 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> unable to wash/dress myself1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> slight problems10 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no problems324 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> slight problems17 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> moderate problems5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no data8 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no problems13 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> moderate problems4 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no problems8 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> slight problems1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> moderate problems1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no problems2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> moderate problems2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> severe problems3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no problems1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> unable to w/d0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no problems8 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> slight problems2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> moderate problems1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> unable to w/d0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> slight problems8 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no problems3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> severe problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no problems336 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> moderate problems2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> moderate problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> slight problems12 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no data6 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> slight problems2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no problems16 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> moderate problems6 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no problems2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no problems3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> unable to wash/dress myself1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> slight problems9 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> slight problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no problems25 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> moderate problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> slight problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> slight problems20 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> moderate problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no problems319 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> unable to w/d1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> slight problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> moderate problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> slight problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> moderate problems6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> slight problems12 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no data5 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> slight problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no problems17 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no problems20 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> slight problems9 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> moderate problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> moderate problems12 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> slight problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> slight problems22 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> moderate problems7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no problems652 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> slight problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> unable to w/d0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no data6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no problems35 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> slight problems22 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> moderate problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> moderate problems7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> unable to w/d0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> moderate problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> slight problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> slight problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> slight problems26 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> slight problems7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no data12 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no problems4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no problems18 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> no problems33 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> moderate problems4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> slight problems26 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> unable to wash/dress myself0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> slight problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> moderate problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> no problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareModerate problems -> moderate problems9 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSevere problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo problems -> no problems647 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareNo data -> no problems18 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareUnable to wash/dress myself -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-CareSlight problems -> severe problems2 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual Activities

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no problems45 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> moderate problems6 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> unable to do usu.0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no problems7 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Moderate problems9 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> slight problems28 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> slight problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> moderate problems15 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> severe problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> severe problems2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no problems12 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> severe problems4 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> slight problems3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> moderate problems2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> moderate problems15 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Severe problems2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> severe problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> slight problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> severe problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> slight problems12 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> no data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no problems14 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Slight problems37 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> No problems196 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> moderate problems7 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no problems3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> slight problems4 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> unable to do usual activities1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> severe problems1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> no data5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> moderate problems2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no problems41 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Slight problems25 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> slight problems2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> slight problems29 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> moderate problems9 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no problems7 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no data2 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> unable to do usu.0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no problems13 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Moderate problems5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> slight problems9 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> moderate problems11 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> No problems228 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> moderate problems1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> severe problems3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> no data4 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no problems15 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> severe problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> slight problems16 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Moderate problems9 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> moderate problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> moderate problems5 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> moderate problems9 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Severe problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> severe problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> No problems219 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> severe problems2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> moderate problems3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> slight problems6 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no problems2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Slight problems28 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> unable to do usu.0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> slight problems23 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no problems7 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> slight problems3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no problems52 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> No problems223 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Slight problems25 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Moderate problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> no data3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no problems52 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> slight problems25 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> moderate problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no data3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no problems13 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> slight problems14 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> moderate problems12 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no problems6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> slight problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> moderate problems6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> severe problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> slight problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> unable to do usu.1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no problems7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> slight problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> moderate problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> slight problems29 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> moderate problems18 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> slight problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Slight problems37 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no problems18 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no problems44 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> slight problems64 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no problems98 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> slight problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> no data5 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no data2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> No problems434 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> moderate problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> moderate problems25 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> unable to do usual activities1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> unable to do usu.1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> moderate problems9 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> severe problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> slight problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> moderate problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no problems7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Moderate problems13 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems ->unable to do usual activities1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Moderate problems11 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> severe problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> slight problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> moderate problems17 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> slight problems30 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Slight problems48 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> moderate problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no problems26 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no data4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems ->unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> unable to do usu.0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> severe problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesUnable to do usual activities -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> moderate problems12 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> slight problems56 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no problems15 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSlight problems -> no problems95 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> No problems451 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> slight problems3 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> no data8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> unable to do usual activities1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> moderate problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo problems -> Severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> severe problems9 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> moderate problems7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> slight problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> unable to do usual activities0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesSevere problems -> no problems11 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual ActivitiesModerate problems -> no data1 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: Mobility

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no problems33 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> moderate problems5 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> unable to walk about0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no problems3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> moderate problems11 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> unable to walk about0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> slight problems27 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> slight problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> moderate problems11 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> severe problems10 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> severe problems5 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no problems12 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> severe problems8 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> slight problems6 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> moderate problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> moderate problems21 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> severe problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> severe problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> slight problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> severe problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> slight problems18 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no problems17 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> slight problems16 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no problems204 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> moderate problems4 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no problems5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> severe problems3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> slight problems7 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> severe problems5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> severe problems1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> unable to walk about1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no data4 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> moderate problems3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no problems35 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> slight problems20 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> slight problems20 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> moderate problems6 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no problems7 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no data3 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no problems7 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> moderate problems12 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> slight problems10 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> moderate problems12 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no problems239 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> severe problems5 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no data5 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no problems25 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> moderate problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> slight problems10 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> moderate problems9 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> moderate problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> moderate problems8 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> moderate problems10 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> severe problems3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> severe problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no problems225 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> severe problems3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> moderate problems4 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> slight problems3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no problems3 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> severe problems4 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> slight problems25 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> unable to walk about0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> slight problems24 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no problems9 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> slight problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> slight problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no problems35 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no problems227 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> slight problems22 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> moderate problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no data4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no problems30 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> slight problems19 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> moderate problems6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no problems18 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> slight problems22 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> moderate problems13 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> unable to walk about1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no problems7 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> slight problems4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> moderate problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> severe problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> slight problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no problems6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> slight problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> slight problems24 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> moderate problems19 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> slight problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> slight problems41 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no problems15 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no problems31 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> slight problems40 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no problems76 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> slight problems4 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> unable to walk about1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no data6 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no problems449 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> moderate problems33 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> severe problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> severe problems11 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> moderate problems15 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> severe problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> slight problems13 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> moderate problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no problems12 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no data1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> moderate problems20 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> unable to walk about1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> moderate problems10 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> severe problems10 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> slight problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> moderate problems35 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> slight problems25 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> slight problems38 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> moderate problems1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no problems46 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no data2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityUnable to walk about -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> moderate problems9 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> slight problems49 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no problems16 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySlight problems -> no problems60 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no problems452 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> slight problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> no data9 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> unable to walk about1 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> moderate problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo problems -> severe problems2 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> no data0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> severe problems13 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> moderate problems15 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> slight problems8 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> unable to walk about0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilitySevere problems -> no problems17 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityNo data -> severe problems0 participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: MobilityModerate problems -> no data2 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from the data recorded by the participant during 3 consecutive days with volume measurements during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition8.44 mLStandard Error 2.55
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition13.32 mLStandard Error 2.57
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition21.99 mLStandard Error 2.57
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition30.99 mLStandard Error 2.56
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition34.84 mLStandard Error 1.81
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition39.73 mLStandard Error 1.81
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.21995% CI: [-2.29, 10]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [2.61, 14.89]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 25 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [15.35, 27.68]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 50 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [11.58, 23.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score

The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consisted of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score-19.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score-23.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score-26.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score-26.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score-31.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score-32.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.98, -2.27]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-8.17, -3.44]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 25 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-9.5, -4.76]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 50 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-8.46, -3.74]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)

The TS-VAS was a visual analogue scale which asked participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)1.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)2.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)2.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)2.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)2.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)2.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.07795% CI: [-0.03, 0.52]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.0595% CI: [0, 0.55]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 25 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00895% CI: [0.1, 0.65]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 50 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\< 65, ≥ 65 years), previous overactive bladder medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [0.1, 0.65]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time Missed

The WPAI:SHP was a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes were expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with both baseline and post-baseline values were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12-2.98 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 21.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedEnd of treatment-2.96 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 21.61
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12-0.33 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 22.03
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedEnd of treatment-0.33 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 22.03
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12-1.72 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 18.7
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedEnd of treatment-1.71 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 18.64
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12-2.47 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 14.13
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedEnd of treatment-2.44 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 14.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12-2.06 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 20.93
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedEnd of treatment-1.48 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 21.95
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12-2.59 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 19.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time MissedEnd of treatment-2.55 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 19.54
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity Impairment

Time frame: Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with both baseline and post-baseline values were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12-11.49 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentEnd of treatment-11.55 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.19
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12-16.89 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.57
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentEnd of treatment-16.72 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.82
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12-14.99 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.81
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentEnd of treatment-15.05 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.95
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12-16.19 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 29.16
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentEnd of treatment-16.05 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 28.95
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12-19.60 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 28.8
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentEnd of treatment-19.45 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 28.8
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12-18.92 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 29.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity ImpairmentEnd of treatment-18.76 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 29.33
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While Working

Time frame: Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with both baseline and post-baseline values were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12-11.27 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 25.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingEnd of treatment-11.18 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 25.28
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12-14.96 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 26.21
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingEnd of treatment-14.96 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 26.21
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12-12.25 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 25.06
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingEnd of treatment-12.37 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 25.01
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12-10.85 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 25.58
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingEnd of treatment-10.98 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 25.68
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12-14.69 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 26.99
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingEnd of treatment-14.58 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 26.92
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12-13.07 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 27.35
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While WorkingEnd of treatment-12.87 percentage of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 27.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work Impairment

Time frame: Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with both baseline and post-baseline values were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12-12.23 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 25.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentEnd of treatment-12.14 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 25.58
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12-15.70 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 26.54
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentEnd of treatment-15.70 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 26.54
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12-12.92 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 26.71
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentEnd of treatment-13.05 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 26.65
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12-12.31 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 26.91
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentEnd of treatment-12.42 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 26.98
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12-16.31 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 29.06
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentEnd of treatment-16.07 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 29.12
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12-13.97 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 29.3
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work ImpairmentEnd of treatment-13.76 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 29.25
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough Difference

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 120.53 nnHgStandard Error 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-0.76 nnHgStandard Error 1.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment0.87 nnHgStandard Error 1.23
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 120.15 nnHgStandard Error 1.34
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-1.08 nnHgStandard Error 1.4
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment0.27 nnHgStandard Error 1.28
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 12-1.90 nnHgStandard Error 1.33
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-0.20 nnHgStandard Error 1.39
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment-0.96 nnHgStandard Error 1.26
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 12-0.66 nnHgStandard Error 1.36
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-1.60 nnHgStandard Error 1.34
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment-1.67 nnHgStandard Error 1.24
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 12-1.24 nnHgStandard Error 0.96
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 40.39 nnHgStandard Error 0.96
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment-0.98 nnHgStandard Error 0.89
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-0.56 nnHgStandard Error 0.91
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment0.52 nnHgStandard Error 0.85
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 120.46 nnHgStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-1.17 mmHgStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime-0.41 mmHgStandard Error 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean nighttime-0.12 mmHgStandard Error 0.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean nighttime-0.49 mmHgStandard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-0.96 mmHgStandard Error 0.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean daytime-0.85 mmHgStandard Error 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean daytime-1.25 mmHgStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean-0.70 mmHgStandard Error 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean-0.80 mmHgStandard Error 0.56
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime-2.00 mmHgStandard Error 0.63
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean nighttime-1.39 mmHgStandard Error 0.71
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean daytime-0.36 mmHgStandard Error 0.58
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean nighttime-0.97 mmHgStandard Error 0.62
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean-0.86 mmHgStandard Error 0.54
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-0.98 mmHgStandard Error 0.58
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean-0.93 mmHgStandard Error 0.58
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-1.41 mmHgStandard Error 0.53
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean daytime-0.54 mmHgStandard Error 0.64
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean daytime-0.33 mmHgStandard Error 0.57
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean nighttime-0.03 mmHgStandard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean-0.19 mmHgStandard Error 0.57
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-0.69 mmHgStandard Error 0.57
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.08 mmHgStandard Error 0.63
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean nighttime0.40 mmHgStandard Error 0.62
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-0.11 mmHgStandard Error 0.52
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean daytime-0.40 mmHgStandard Error 0.65
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.22 mmHgStandard Error 0.54
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean nighttime0.92 mmHgStandard Error 0.71
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.25 mmHgStandard Error 0.52
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean daytime-0.77 mmHgStandard Error 0.58
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean nighttime0.48 mmHgStandard Error 0.63
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean0.43 mmHgStandard Error 0.59
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean daytime-0.33 mmHgStandard Error 0.66
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean0.05 mmHgStandard Error 0.52
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-0.79 mmHgStandard Error 0.57
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.71 mmHgStandard Error 0.63
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean daytime-0.06 mmHgStandard Error 0.46
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean-0.37 mmHgStandard Error 0.41
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-0.02 mmHgStandard Error 0.37
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean nighttime0.93 mmHgStandard Error 0.44
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.56 mmHgStandard Error 0.45
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-0.18 mmHgStandard Error 0.4
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean daytime-0.40 mmHgStandard Error 0.4
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.03 mmHgStandard Error 0.37
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean nighttime0.23 mmHgStandard Error 0.49
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.38 mmHgStandard Error 0.35
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean0.31 mmHgStandard Error 0.39
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean nighttime0.49 mmHgStandard Error 0.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.61 mmHgStandard Error 0.43
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-0.36 mmHgStandard Error 0.38
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean0.25 mmHgStandard Error 0.35
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean nighttime0.47 mmHgStandard Error 0.42
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 12: mean daytime-0.18 mmHgStandard Error 0.44
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Week 4: mean daytime0.07 mmHgStandard Error 0.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean daytime0.45 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.39 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean nighttime-0.72 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean nighttime0.34 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: 24-hour mean0.41 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean daytime0.89 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean daytime-0.70 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: 24-hour mean-0.83 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: 24-hour mean0.70 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.72
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.82 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.69
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean nighttime0.21 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.77
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean daytime1.19 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.79
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean nighttime0.98 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.71
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: 24-hour mean1.14 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean daytime0.37 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.8
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: 24-hour mean0.38 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.74
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: 24-hour mean0.63 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean daytime0.25 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.88
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean daytime3.52 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.78
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean nighttime0.19 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.73
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: 24-hour mean1.19 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.74
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean daytime2.64 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.79
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.75 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean nighttime1.77 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.7
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: 24-hour mean1.67 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.67
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean daytime2.12 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.89
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: 24-hour mean2.32 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.67
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean nighttime0.06 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.76
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.36 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.65
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean daytime0.37 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.8
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean nighttime1.09 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.72
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: 24-hour mean0.12 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.76
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean daytime-0.13 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.9
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: 24-hour mean0.02 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.66
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean daytime-0.07 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.79
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.45 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.68
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean daytime0.84 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.64
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: 24-hour mean0.94 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.53
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: 24-hour mean0.85 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean nighttime0.86 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.5
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean nighttime1.21 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.49
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean daytime0.32 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.56
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean daytime-0.05 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.54
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.40 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.46
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean nighttime0.76 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.53
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.69 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.44
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: 24-hour mean1.44 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.5
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean nighttime1.52 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.51
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean nighttime1.64 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: mean daytime1.24 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.53
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)End of treatment: 24-hour mean1.52 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.45
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean nighttime0.86 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.48
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 12: mean daytime1.36 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.61
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)Week 4: mean daytime0.61 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.51
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPM analysis set (ABPMAS), which consisted of all participants in the SAF for whom at least 1 ABPM variable could be calculated at baseline and postbaseline visit. Participants with data available at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-2.01 mmHgStandard Error 1.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime-1.00 mmHgStandard Error 1.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean nighttime-0.51 mmHgStandard Error 1.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean nighttime-1.03 mmHgStandard Error 1.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-1.73 mmHgStandard Error 1.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean daytime-2.22 mmHgStandard Error 1.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean daytime-1.55 mmHgStandard Error 1.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean-1.00 mmHgStandard Error 1.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean-1.97 mmHgStandard Error 1.37
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime-3.48 mmHgStandard Error 1.54
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean nighttime-2.81 mmHgStandard Error 1.77
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean daytime-1.19 mmHgStandard Error 1.33
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean nighttime-1.14 mmHgStandard Error 1.46
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean-2.04 mmHgStandard Error 1.31
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-3.29 mmHgStandard Error 1.31
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean-2.70 mmHgStandard Error 1.42
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-3.44 mmHgStandard Error 1.29
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean daytime-2.53 mmHgStandard Error 1.46
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean daytime-0.67 mmHgStandard Error 1.31
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean nighttime-0.77 mmHgStandard Error 1.68
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean-1.75 mmHgStandard Error 1.41
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-1.92 mmHgStandard Error 1.3
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime-0.60 mmHgStandard Error 1.52
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean nighttime1.42 mmHgStandard Error 1.44
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-1.14 mmHgStandard Error 1.27
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean daytime-2.14 mmHgStandard Error 1.48
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.96 mmHgStandard Error 1.3
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean nighttime1.31 mmHgStandard Error 1.76
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean1.03 mmHgStandard Error 1.26
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean daytime-1.13 mmHgStandard Error 1.34
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean nighttime0.41 mmHgStandard Error 1.47
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean0.40 mmHgStandard Error 1.45
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean daytime-2.09 mmHgStandard Error 1.5
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean0.37 mmHgStandard Error 1.25
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-2.17 mmHgStandard Error 1.3
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime1.42 mmHgStandard Error 1.52
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean daytime-0.39 mmHgStandard Error 1.06
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean-0.71 mmHgStandard Error 1.02
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-0.52 mmHgStandard Error 0.9
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean nighttime1.14 mmHgStandard Error 1.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.41 mmHgStandard Error 1.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-0.68 mmHgStandard Error 0.92
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean daytime-1.63 mmHgStandard Error 0.91
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean-0.85 mmHgStandard Error 0.9
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean nighttime0.11 mmHgStandard Error 1.23
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: 24-hour mean0.31 mmHgStandard Error 0.85
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: 24-hour mean0.40 mmHgStandard Error 0.95
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean nighttime0.79 mmHgStandard Error 1.17
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean nighttime0.91 mmHgStandard Error 1.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: mean daytime-1.28 mmHgStandard Error 0.87
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)End of treatment: 24-hour mean-0.08 mmHgStandard Error 0.85
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean nighttime0.54 mmHgStandard Error 0.98
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 12: mean daytime-0.71 mmHgStandard Error 1.02
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Week 4: mean daytime-0.53 mmHgStandard Error 0.85
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax Window

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 12-1.74 mmHgStandard Error 0.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 4-1.24 mmHgStandard Error 0.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment-1.85 mmHgStandard Error 0.84
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 12-0.45 mmHgStandard Error 1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 40.09 mmHgStandard Error 0.93
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment-0.71 mmHgStandard Error 0.88
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 12-0.31 mmHgStandard Error 0.97
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 4-0.65 mmHgStandard Error 0.86
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment-0.71 mmHgStandard Error 0.85
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 12-1.49 mmHgStandard Error 1.01
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 4-0.48 mmHgStandard Error 0.87
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment-1.22 mmHgStandard Error 0.86
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 120.48 mmHgStandard Error 0.68
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 4-0.22 mmHgStandard Error 0.62
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment0.44 mmHgStandard Error 0.61
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 4-0.71 mmHgStandard Error 0.58
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment-0.80 mmHgStandard Error 0.59
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax WindowWeek 12-0.03 mmHgStandard Error 0.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax Window

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 120.10 bpmStandard Error 1.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment-0.43 bpmStandard Error 1.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 40.02 bpmStandard Error 1.08
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 121.22 bpmStandard Error 1.2
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 42.39 bpmStandard Error 1.19
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment0.82 bpmStandard Error 1.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment3.41 bpmStandard Error 1.07
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 43.68 bpmStandard Error 1.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 121.87 bpmStandard Error 1.16
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 120.37 bpmStandard Error 1.21
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 40.47 bpmStandard Error 1.11
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment-1.25 bpmStandard Error 1.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 120.15 bpmStandard Error 0.81
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 4-0.91 bpmStandard Error 0.79
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment0.34 bpmStandard Error 0.76
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowEnd of treatment1.25 bpmStandard Error 0.73
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 121.39 bpmStandard Error 0.81
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax WindowWeek 40.67 bpmStandard Error 0.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Window

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax (time to maximum concentration) window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 12-4.86 mmHgStandard Error 1.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 4-2.71 mmHgStandard Error 1.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowEnd of treatment-4.40 mmHgStandard Error 1.6
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 12-2.13 mmHgStandard Error 1.95
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 40.34 mmHgStandard Error 1.86
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowEnd of treatment-2.19 mmHgStandard Error 1.68
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 12-1.64 mmHgStandard Error 1.88
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 4-1.03 mmHgStandard Error 1.72
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowEnd of treatment-1.94 mmHgStandard Error 1.64
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 12-3.15 mmHgStandard Error 1.96
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 4-1.77 mmHgStandard Error 1.74
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowEnd of treatment-3.64 mmHgStandard Error 1.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 12-0.26 mmHgStandard Error 1.32
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 4-1.55 mmHgStandard Error 1.23
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowEnd of treatment-0.61 mmHgStandard Error 1.16
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 4-1.47 mmHgStandard Error 1.17
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowEnd of treatment-0.98 mmHgStandard Error 1.12
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) WindowWeek 120.60 mmHgStandard Error 1.32
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough Difference

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 123.35 bpmStandard Error 1.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 41.16 bpmStandard Error 1.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment2.48 bpmStandard Error 1.32
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 12-0.04 bpmStandard Error 1.5
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 40.46 bpmStandard Error 1.48
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment0.45 bpmStandard Error 1.37
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 121.15 bpmStandard Error 1.49
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 41.54 bpmStandard Error 1.46
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment1.14 bpmStandard Error 1.35
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 123.49 bpmStandard Error 1.53
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 40.78 bpmStandard Error 1.41
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment3.16 bpmStandard Error 1.33
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 12-0.53 bpmStandard Error 1.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-0.68 bpmStandard Error 1.01
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment-0.02 bpmStandard Error 0.96
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-0.51 bpmStandard Error 0.96
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment1.80 bpmStandard Error 0.91
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 121.48 bpmStandard Error 1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough Difference

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 121.18 mmHgStandard Error 1.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-0.71 mmHgStandard Error 1.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment1.15 mmHgStandard Error 1.83
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 12-2.45 mmHgStandard Error 2.05
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 40.14 mmHgStandard Error 1.99
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment-1.38 mmHgStandard Error 1.91
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 12-4.55 mmHgStandard Error 2.03
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-0.69 mmHgStandard Error 1.98
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment-2.30 mmHgStandard Error 1.87
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 12-1.63 mmHgStandard Error 2.08
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 40.85 mmHgStandard Error 1.91
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment-0.97 mmHgStandard Error 1.85
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 120.68 mmHgStandard Error 1.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 4-1.61 mmHgStandard Error 1.36
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment0.25 mmHgStandard Error 1.33
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 40.41 mmHgStandard Error 1.29
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceEnd of treatment0.68 mmHgStandard Error 1.26
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough DifferenceWeek 120.62 mmHgStandard Error 1.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24hr was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with ≥ 1 nocturia episode at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.17 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-0.27 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-0.26 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatmemt-0.27 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-0.38 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-0.37 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.31 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatmemt-0.40 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatmemt-0.39 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-0.39 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-0.35 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.25 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.24 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatmemt-0.39 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-0.36 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-0.41 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-0.49 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatmemt-0.48 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-0.44 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.33 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-0.50 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-0.56 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatmemt-0.56 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.35 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.03
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.06595% CI: [-0.19, 0.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.26, -0.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.195% CI: [-0.18, 0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.26, -0.07]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

The mean number of pads used per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with ≥ 1 pad used at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.52 padsStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8-0.82 padsStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12-0.92 padsStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-0.94 padsStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.30 padsStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.20 padsStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.81 padsStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.26 padsStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.41 padsStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.37 padsStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.24 padsStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.12 padsStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.19 padsStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.53 padsStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.53 padsStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.56 padsStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.54 padsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.53 padsStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.36 padsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.09 padsStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.51 padsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.59 padsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.58 padsStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.23 padsStandard Error 0.07
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.99395% CI: [-0.25, 0.25]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.6595% CI: [-0.3, 0.19]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.03595% CI: [-0.52, -0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariatep-value: 0.16995% CI: [-0.43, 0.08]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

An urgency episode was a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which was difficult to defer; it was recorded when a micturition or incontinence episode was recorded and the severity of urinary urgency recorded was 3 (severe urgency) or 4 (urgency incontinence) according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS). The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with ≥ 1 urgency episode at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.34 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.85 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.05 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-2.06 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.85 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.16
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8-2.54 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.95 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.14
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-2.74 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-2.63 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.70 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.16
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8-2.43 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.91 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4-2.14 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-3.05 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8-2.90 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.15
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12-3.11 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.16
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12-3.45 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-3.38 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8-3.13 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4-2.42 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8-3.28 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12-3.50 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-3.51 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4-2.66 urgency episodesStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.07495% CI: [-0.69, 0.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.01495% CI: [-0.82, -0.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.01, -0.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.24, 0.51]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.78 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.15 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.29 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.33 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.09
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.63 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.43 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.00 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.09
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.58 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.09
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.62 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.09
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.67 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.44 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.15 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.19 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.71 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.56 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.72 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.99 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.95 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.06
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.74 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.35 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.06
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.79 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.93 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursEnd of treatment-1.94 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.06
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.47 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.06
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.13495% CI: [-0.46, -0.02]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.04395% CI: [-0.45, -0.02]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.59, -0.15]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50mg ) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-0.54, -0.1]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence Episodes

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-5.23 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-8.79 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-9.05 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-9.42 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-12.33 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.72
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-10.57 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.72
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-7.59 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.66
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-11.93 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-12.39 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-12.58 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.72
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-10.97 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.72
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-8.99 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.67
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-8.92 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.67
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-12.65 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.68
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-11.89 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.72
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-12.75 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.71
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-14.50 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.51
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-14.29 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.48
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-12.53 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.5
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-9.62 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-12.78 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.51
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-13.94 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.51
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-13.98 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.48
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-10.51 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.47
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.offset variable.p-value: 0.07495% CI: [-3.27, -0.01]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.02595% CI: [-2.96, 0.3]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 25 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4, -0.73]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the mirabegron 50 mg monotherapy group from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.02495% CI: [-3.23, 0.05]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia Episodes

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with ≥ 1 nocturia episode at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 4-1.27 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 8-1.94 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 12-1.95 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesEnd of treatment-2.05 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.27
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 12-2.77 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.3
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 8-2.70 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.28
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 4-2.25 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.28
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesEnd of treatment-2.91 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.28
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesEnd of treatment-2.75 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.28
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 12-2.73 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.29
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 8-2.41 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.28
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 4-1.80 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.27
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 4-1.79 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.28
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesEnd of treatment-2.81 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.28
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 8-2.60 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.28
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 12-2.89 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.29
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 12-3.49 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.21
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesEnd of treatment-3.42 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.2
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 8-3.13 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.2
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 4-2.39 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.19
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 8-3.48 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.2
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 12-3.96 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.21
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesEnd of treatment-3.96 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.2
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia EpisodesWeek 4-2.50 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.19
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.07395% CI: [-1.28, 0.06]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.83, -0.48]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.1495% CI: [-1.18, 0.17]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.88, -0.54]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads Used

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EOT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with ≥ 1 pad used at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 4-3.69 padsStandard Error 0.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 8-6.24 padsStandard Error 0.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 12-6.29 padsStandard Error 0.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedEnd of treatment-6.60 padsStandard Error 0.71
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 12-9.06 padsStandard Error 0.75
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 8-8.44 padsStandard Error 0.77
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 4-5.68 padsStandard Error 0.71
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedEnd of treatment-8.76 padsStandard Error 0.71
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedEnd of treatment-9.80 padsStandard Error 0.72
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 12-9.41 padsStandard Error 0.75
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 8-8.43 padsStandard Error 0.76
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 4-7.83 padsStandard Error 0.71
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 4-8.23 padsStandard Error 0.7
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedEnd of treatment-10.63 padsStandard Error 0.7
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 8-10.67 padsStandard Error 0.76
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 12-10.80 padsStandard Error 0.73
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 12-10.66 padsStandard Error 0.52
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedEnd of treatment-10.67 padsStandard Error 0.5
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 8-9.49 padsStandard Error 0.54
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 4-7.61 padsStandard Error 0.5
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 8-10.59 padsStandard Error 0.54
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 12-11.23 padsStandard Error 0.53
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedEnd of treatment-11.21 padsStandard Error 0.5
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads UsedWeek 4-8.58 padsStandard Error 0.5
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.95895% CI: [-1.73, 1.64]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.595% CI: [-2.27, 1.11]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.02895% CI: [-3.62, -0.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.10895% CI: [-3.13, 0.31]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. Only participants with ≥ 1 urgency incontinence episode at baseline were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-5.49 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-8.30 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-8.96 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-9.26 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.62
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-11.39 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.66
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-9.93 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.67
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-7.07 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.63
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-11.03 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.62
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-11.44 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.62
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-11.66 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.66
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-10.07 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.67
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-8.39 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.63
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-8.53 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.63
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-12.03 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.62
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-11.10 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.67
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-12.10 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-13.87 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.46
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-13.64 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.44
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-12.18 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-9.44 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.44
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 8-12.18 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 12-13.53 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.46
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesEnd of treatment-13.64 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.44
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence EpisodesWeek 4-10.23 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.44
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.11495% CI: [-3.09, -0.13]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.03495% CI: [-3.1, -0.13]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4.09, -1.12]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.01295% CI: [-3.7, -0.71]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total Score

The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion in the OAB-q (seen in this outcome measure) consisted of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), scored 1-6. The total HRQoL score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 410.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 814.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 1215.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreEnd of treatment15.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 1219.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 817.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 413.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreEnd of treatment18.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreEnd of treatment21.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 1221.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 818.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 415.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 414.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreEnd of treatment20.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 818.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 1220.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.91
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 1224.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreEnd of treatment23.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 822.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 417.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 822.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 1224.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreEnd of treatment24.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 417.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.69, 5.94]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.03, 6.29]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.88, 7.15]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.17, 5.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Concern

The Concern score was calculated by adding 7 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 411.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 816.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 1217.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernEnd of treatment16.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 1222.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 820.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 415.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernEnd of treatment21.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernEnd of treatment23.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 1223.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 820.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 417.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 417.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernEnd of treatment22.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 820.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 1223.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 1227.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernEnd of treatment26.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 825.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 420.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 825.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 1228.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernEnd of treatment27.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: ConcernWeek 421.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.84, 6.63]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.42, 7.22]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.93, 7.75]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.01, 6.81]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Coping

The Coping score was calculated by adding 8 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 411.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 816.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 1218.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingEnd of treatment17.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 1222.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 820.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 414.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingEnd of treatment21.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.06
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingEnd of treatment24.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 1224.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 821.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 417.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 416.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingEnd of treatment23.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 821.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 1223.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 1228.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingEnd of treatment27.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 825.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 419.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 825.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 1229.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingEnd of treatment28.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: CopingWeek 420.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.6, 6.65]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.34, 7.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.55, 8.63]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.27, 6.33]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Sleep

The Sleep score was calculated by adding 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 49.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 813.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 1214.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepEnd of treatment14.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 1218.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.06
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 816.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 412.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepEnd of treatment17.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.02
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepEnd of treatment19.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.02
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 1219.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.06
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 817.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 413.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 413.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepEnd of treatment17.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 816.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 1218.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 1222.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepEnd of treatment22.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 820.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 415.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 820.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 1222.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepEnd of treatment22.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SleepWeek 416.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.98, 6.85]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.98, 6.86]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.42, 7.32]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00895% CI: [0.84, 5.72]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Social

The Social score was calculated by adding 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 47.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 810.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 1210.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialEnd of treatment10.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 1213.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 811.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 49.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialEnd of treatment13.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialEnd of treatment14.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 1215.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 812.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 410.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 49.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialEnd of treatment13.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 812.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 1213.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 1216.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialEnd of treatment15.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 814.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 411.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 814.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 1216.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialEnd of treatment15.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: SocialWeek 411.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.02295% CI: [0.33, 4.21]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.02395% CI: [0.31, 4.19]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [0.85, 4.74]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.33795% CI: [-0.99, 2.89]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)

The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 4-0.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 8-0.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 12-0.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)End of treatment-0.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 12-1.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 8-1.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 4-0.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)End of treatment-1.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)End of treatment-1.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 12-1.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 8-1.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 4-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 4-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)End of treatment-1.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 8-1.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 12-1.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 12-1.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)End of treatment-1.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 8-1.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 4-0.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 8-1.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 12-1.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)End of treatment-1.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)Week 4-1.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.41, -0.11]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (solifenacin 5 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.54, -0.25]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 25 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.5, -0.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Difference of the adjusted mean calculated by subtracting the adjusted mean of the monotherapy group (mirabegron 50 mg) from the adjusted mean of the combination group (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) based on the ANCOVA model with treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline value as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.5, -0.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume

PVR volume was assessed by ultrasonography or a bladder scanner.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: SAF participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeEnd of treatment-1.0 mLStandard Deviation 29.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 12-1.0 mLStandard Deviation 29.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 8-1.9 mLStandard Deviation 28.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 4-0.8 mLStandard Deviation 29.9
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 8-0.4 mLStandard Deviation 29.8
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 41.6 mLStandard Deviation 28
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeEnd of treatment0.7 mLStandard Deviation 29.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 121.0 mLStandard Deviation 29.8
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 8-0.6 mLStandard Deviation 34.4
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 4-2.1 mLStandard Deviation 29.7
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeEnd of treatment-0.8 mLStandard Deviation 30
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 120.0 mLStandard Deviation 30.1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 85.4 mLStandard Deviation 35.2
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeEnd of treatment4.8 mLStandard Deviation 33.3
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 45.8 mLStandard Deviation 35.6
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 124.7 mLStandard Deviation 33.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 47.2 mLStandard Deviation 47.7
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 87.0 mLStandard Deviation 37.4
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 127.9 mLStandard Deviation 44.4
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeEnd of treatment9.0 mLStandard Deviation 55
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 89.9 mLStandard Deviation 46
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 410.6 mLStandard Deviation 51.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeEnd of treatment11.0 mLStandard Deviation 54.9
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) VolumeWeek 129.6 mLStandard Deviation 50.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.20 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-0.74 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.30 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.51 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.07 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.76 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.57 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.24 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.81 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.66 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.24 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.80 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.79 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.38 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.08 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.50 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.98 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.84 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.43 micturitionsStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.02 micturitionsStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12-1.51 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.95 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.46 micturitionsStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.01 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.89 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.44 micturitionsStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.03 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8-1.84 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.39 micturitionsStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.22 micturitionsStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8-2.23 micturitionsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.67 micturitionsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.47 micturitionsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 4-1.91 micturitionsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12-2.60 micturitionsStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8-2.42 micturitionsStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 89.00 mLStandard Error 2.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 46.95 mLStandard Error 2.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 128.70 mLStandard Error 2.7
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 810.96 mLStandard Error 2.52
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 410.08 mLStandard Error 2.14
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 1212.88 mLStandard Error 2.74
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 817.73 mLStandard Error 2.53
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 415.52 mLStandard Error 2.14
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 1222.40 mLStandard Error 2.73
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 827.55 mLStandard Error 2.5
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 424.23 mLStandard Error 2.15
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 1231.89 mLStandard Error 2.68
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 832.94 mLStandard Error 1.78
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 425.54 mLStandard Error 1.51
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 1235.52 mLStandard Error 1.9
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 428.99 mLStandard Error 1.51
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 1241.28 mLStandard Error 1.9
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 836.51 mLStandard Error 1.77
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score

The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion in the OAB-q (seen in this outcome measure) consisted of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8-17.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4-13.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12-19.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8-22.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4-17.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12-24.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.02
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8-23.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4-18.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12-26.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.02
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8-24.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4-19.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12-26.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8-29.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4-23.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12-31.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4-25.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12-33.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8-30.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VAS

The TS-VAS was a visual analogue scale which asked participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and week 4, 8 and 12

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 81.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 41.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 121.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 82.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 41.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 122.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 82.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 41.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 122.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 82.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 41.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 122.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 82.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 42.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 122.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 42.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 122.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VASWeek 82.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. Only participants with an increase (i.e., maximum 1-hour change from time-matched baseline ≥ 0 mmHg) were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1219.68 mmHgStandard Error 1.23
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 418.78 mmHgStandard Error 1.27
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment20.29 mmHgStandard Error 1.16
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1219.52 mmHgStandard Error 1.28
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 419.15 mmHgStandard Error 1.36
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment19.29 mmHgStandard Error 1.22
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1220.41 mmHgStandard Error 1.27
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 420.41 mmHgStandard Error 1.35
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment20.71 mmHgStandard Error 1.19
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1221.18 mmHgStandard Error 1.3
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 420.02 mmHgStandard Error 1.31
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment20.47 mmHgStandard Error 1.18
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1219.26 mmHgStandard Error 0.92
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 420.74 mmHgStandard Error 0.93
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment20.29 mmHgStandard Error 0.85
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 420.27 mmHgStandard Error 0.88
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment20.36 mmHgStandard Error 0.8
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1220.01 mmHgStandard Error 0.85
Secondary

Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. Only participants with an increase (i.e., maximum 1-hour change from time-matched baseline ≥ 0 mmHg) were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1222.63 bpmStandard Error 1.42
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 422.34 bpmStandard Error 1.35
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment23.01 bpmStandard Error 1.31
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1223.54 bpmStandard Error 1.47
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 423.86 bpmStandard Error 1.44
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment24.12 bpmStandard Error 1.37
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1226.03 bpmStandard Error 1.46
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 425.12 bpmStandard Error 1.43
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment26.23 bpmStandard Error 1.34
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1223.52 bpmStandard Error 1.5
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 424.28 bpmStandard Error 1.38
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment23.33 bpmStandard Error 1.33
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1222.60 bpmStandard Error 1.05
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 421.48 bpmStandard Error 0.99
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment22.66 bpmStandard Error 0.96
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 421.80 bpmStandard Error 0.94
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment24.14 bpmStandard Error 0.9
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1224.08 bpmStandard Error 0.98
Secondary

Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: ABPMAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. Only participants with an increase (i.e., maximum 1-hour change from time-matched baseline ≥ 0 mmHg) were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1233.21 mmHgStandard Error 2.3
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 434.05 mmHgStandard Error 2.06
PlaceboMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment34.98 mmHgStandard Error 2.11
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1230.68 mmHgStandard Error 2.38
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 431.14 mmHgStandard Error 2.2
Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment30.65 mmHgStandard Error 2.2
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1232.88 mmHgStandard Error 2.36
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 438.20 mmHgStandard Error 2.19
Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment33.53 mmHgStandard Error 2.16
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1235.11 mmHgStandard Error 2.42
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 435.16 mmHgStandard Error 2.11
Solifenacin 5 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment34.95 mmHgStandard Error 2.14
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1233.53 mmHgStandard Error 1.7
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 432.88 mmHgStandard Error 1.51
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment34.70 mmHgStandard Error 1.54
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 432.80 mmHgStandard Error 1.43
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment32.55 mmHgStandard Error 1.45
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoTWeek 1232.82 mmHgStandard Error 1.59
Secondary

Number of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of days with \< 8 micturitions was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with less than 8 micturitions per day.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8,12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 41.49 daysStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 81.69 daysStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 121.76 daysStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment1.80 daysStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 122.31 daysStandard Error 0.13
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 82.08 daysStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 41.74 daysStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment2.28 daysStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment2.22 daysStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 122.25 daysStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 81.99 daysStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 41.55 daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 41.86 daysStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment2.49 daysStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 82.22 daysStandard Error 0.12
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 122.49 daysStandard Error 0.13
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 122.87 daysStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment2.84 daysStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 82.59 daysStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 42.07 daysStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 82.70 daysStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 122.95 daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment2.92 daysStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 42.11 daysStandard Error 0.08
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.03995% CI: [1.01, 1.5]Overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00995% CI: [1.07, 1.59]Overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.19, 1.77]overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariatep-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.23, 1.84]Overdispersed binomial regression
Secondary

Number of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of incontinence episodes was calculated as the total number of incontinence episodes on valid diary days recorded during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 418.09 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.17
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 814.45 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.12
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1214.06 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.17
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment13.70 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.08
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1210.60 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.98
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 812.84 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.05
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 415.65 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.08
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment11.19 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.95
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment9.79 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.94
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 129.50 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.98
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 811.31 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.09
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 412.90 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.06
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 415.31 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.11
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment11.21 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.98
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 812.19 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.06
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1211.25 incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.03
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 127.62 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.57
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment8.02 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.55
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 89.70 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 412.51 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.67
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 89.33 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.68
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 128.21 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.68
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment8.18 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.64
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 411.44 incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.7
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, ≥65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, log(number of incontinence episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) at baseline included as a covariate and number of valid diary days at EoT as the offset variable.p-value: 0.13595% CI: [0.72, 1.04]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, ≥65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, log(number of incontinence episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) at baseline included as a covariate and number of valid diary days at EoT as the offset variable.p-value: 0.28295% CI: [0.75, 1.09]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, ≥65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, log(number of incontinence episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) at baseline included as a covariate and number of valid diary days at EoT as the offset variable.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.59, 0.85]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, ≥65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, log(number of incontinence episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) at baseline included as a covariate and number of valid diary days at EoT as the offset variable.p-value: 0.17295% CI: [0.73, 1.06]Negative binomial regression
Secondary

Number of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of incontinence-free days was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 42.25 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 82.92 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 123.19 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment3.16 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 123.69 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.15
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 83.17 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 42.48 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.13
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment3.51 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment3.89 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 123.96 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.15
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 83.63 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.15
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 42.98 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.13
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 42.74 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment3.61 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 83.31 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 123.68 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.14
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 124.33 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment4.20 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 83.88 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 43.08 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 84.01 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 124.25 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment4.23 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 43.37 incontinence-free daysStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline logarithm of mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.11, 1.68]Overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline logarithm of mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.11, 1.68]Overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline logarithm of mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.29, 1.95]Overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline logarithm of mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.1, 1.68]Overdispersed binomial regression
Secondary

Number of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of incontinence-free days with \< 8 micturitions per day was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded and with \< 8 micturitions per day.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 40.64 daysStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 80.85 daysStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 120.98 daysStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment1.01 daysStandard Error 0.08
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 121.47 daysStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 81.20 daysStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 40.84 daysStandard Error 0.08
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment1.40 daysStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment1.47 daysStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 121.50 daysStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 81.23 daysStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 40.87 daysStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 40.91 daysStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment1.59 daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 81.31 daysStandard Error 0.1
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 121.60 daysStandard Error 0.11
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 122.12 daysStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment2.04 daysStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 81.75 daysStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 41.21 daysStandard Error 0.07
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 81.89 daysStandard Error 0.08
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 122.15 daysStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment2.12 daysStandard Error 0.09
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 41.32 daysStandard Error 0.07
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.01195% CI: [1.07, 1.64]Overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.14, 1.75]Overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.32, 2.06]Overdispersed binomial regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a overdispersed binomial regression model (Williams' method) including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.33, 2.07]Overdispersed binomial regression
Secondary

Number of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant went to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the patients got up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The number of nocturia episodes was the number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with ≥ 1 nocturia episode at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 49.62 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 88.99 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.44
PlaceboNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 128.91 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment8.83 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.42
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 127.99 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.37
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 88.07 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.34
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 48.46 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.36
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment7.79 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.35
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment8.14 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.45
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 128.34 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.48
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 88.61 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.45
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 49.11 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.47
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 49.22 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.42
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment8.12 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.37
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 88.37 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.38
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 128.17 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.39
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 127.26 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.24
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment7.33 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.24
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 87.63 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.25
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 48.40 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.25
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 87.11 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.24
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 126.67 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.23
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment6.67 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.22
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 48.09 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.25
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of nocturia episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate and postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.00695% CI: [0.81, 0.96]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of nocturia episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate and postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.74, 0.88]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of nocturia episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate and postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.04995% CI: [0.84, 1]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of nocturia episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate and postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.79, 0.94]Negative binomial regression
Secondary

Number of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of pads used was the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with ≥ 1 pad used at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 415.62 padsStandard Error 1.33
PlaceboNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1212.62 padsStandard Error 1.21
PlaceboNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 812.75 padsStandard Error 1.22
PlaceboNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment12.29 padsStandard Error 1.11
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 129.65 padsStandard Error 1
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 413.46 padsStandard Error 1.24
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 810.79 padsStandard Error 1.05
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment10.15 padsStandard Error 0.97
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment8.16 padsStandard Error 1.17
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 410.05 padsStandard Error 1.21
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 128.44 padsStandard Error 1.26
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 89.53 padsStandard Error 1.39
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 88.45 padsStandard Error 1.03
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment8.53 padsStandard Error 0.94
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 411.41 padsStandard Error 1.23
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 128.21 padsStandard Error 0.95
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 49.71 padsStandard Error 0.7
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment7.04 padsStandard Error 0.56
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 88.07 padsStandard Error 0.65
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 126.60 padsStandard Error 0.58
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment6.80 padsStandard Error 0.59
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 126.64 padsStandard Error 0.61
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 49.34 padsStandard Error 0.68
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 87.58 padsStandard Error 0.62
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of pads used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate and postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.93895% CI: [0.8, 1.27]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of pads used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate and postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.96795% CI: [0.79, 1.25]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of pads used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate and postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.00895% CI: [0.58, 0.92]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary between the given combination group and the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of pads used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate and postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.06995% CI: [0.64, 1.02]Negative binomial regression
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE refered to an adverse event (AE; defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or who had undergone study procedures and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment) which started or worsened in the period from first double-blind medication intake until 14 days after the last double-blind medication intake. Serious TEAEs with a start date reported until 30 days after the last double-blind medication intake were also summarized as TEAEs, and also included serious TEAEs upgraded by the sponsor based on review of the sponsor's list of Always Serious terms if any upgrade was done. Drug-related TEAEs may be possible or probable, as assessed by the investigator, or records where relationship is missing.

Time frame: From first dose of double-blind study drug up to 30 days after last dose of double-blind study drug (up to 16 weeks)

Population: Safety Analysis Set (SAF), which comprised all randomized participants who received ≥ 1 dose of double-blind treatment and excluded participants from one site.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE145 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related serious TEAEs0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs45 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs8 Participants
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs37 Participants
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs6 Participants
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths0 Participants
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related serious TEAEs1 Participants
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE135 Participants
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation4 Participants
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation7 Participants
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths0 Participants
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs52 Participants
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE147 Participants
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related serious TEAEs1 Participants
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation10 Participants
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs5 Participants
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation6 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs3 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE149 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs63 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths0 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related serious TEAEs0 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation7 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation5 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths0 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs157 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation17 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE345 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation20 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs12 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related serious TEAEs2 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation19 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related serious TEAEs3 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths0 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEs150 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation22 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE314 Participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs19 Participants
Secondary

Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The number of urgency incontinence episodes was the number of times a participant recorded an urgency incontinence episode on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT. Only participants with ≥ 1 urgency incontinence episode at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 415.76 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.1
PlaceboNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 812.77 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.07
PlaceboNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1212.00 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.09
PlaceboNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment11.69 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 1
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 128.84 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.89
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 810.65 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.94
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 413.36 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.99
Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment9.37 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.86
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment8.63 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.89
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 128.32 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.94
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 810.09 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.02
Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 411.46 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 1
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 413.19 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 1.06
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment9.29 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.91
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 810.41 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 1
Solifenacin 5 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 129.29 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.96
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 125.86 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.46
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment6.25 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.45
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 87.58 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.53
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 410.22 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.58
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 87.31 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.54
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 126.27 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.49
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment6.15 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.47
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 49.33 urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.58
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of urgency incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary bet. the given combination group \& the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65,≥ 65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of urgency incontinence episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate \& postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.1195% CI: [0.7, 1.04]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of urgency incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary bet. the given combination group \& the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65,≥ 65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of urgency incontinence episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate \& postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.28895% CI: [0.73, 1.1]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of urgency incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary bet. the given combination group \& the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65,≥ 65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of urgency incontinence episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate \& postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.53, 0.79]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Rate ratio of number of urgency incontinence episodes during the 7-day diary bet. the given combination group \& the given monotherapy group calculated from a negative binomial regression model incl. treatment group, sex, age group (\<65,≥ 65 years), geographic region and previous OAB medication (yes, no) as factors, baseline log(number of urgency incontinence episodes used divided by number of valid diary days) included as a covariate \& postbaseline number of valid diary days as offset variable.p-value: 0.08495% CI: [0.68, 1.02]Negative binomial regression
Secondary

Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoT

The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).

Time frame: Week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much worse1.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: No change18.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved29.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change17.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally worse4.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved8.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally improved29.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved29.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much improved30.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse4.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse1.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much improved8.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much improved13.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse1.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much worse1.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved32.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved13.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally worse1.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved26.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: No change13.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally improved26.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change12.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much improved33.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse1.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change9.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved15.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved34.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved26.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse2.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse1.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much improved15.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much improved34.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally improved27.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: No change10.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally worse2.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much worse1.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much worse0.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved13.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally improved26.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much worse0.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved25.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: No change9.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much improved13.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much improved41.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse1.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved40.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change8.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally worse1.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse0.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much improved20.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change7.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved19.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much improved40.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally improved22.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved22.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: No change7.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved39.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally worse0.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much worse0.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse0.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much worse0.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse0.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally worse0.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much improved34.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved27.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change7.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Much worse0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much worse0.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: No change7.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved34.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Very much improved27.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTEoT: Minimally improved21.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved20.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with micturition frequency normalization was defined as any participant who had ≥ 8 micturitions/24 hours at baseline and \< 8 micturitions/24 h postbaseline at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 , 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 424.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 828.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1229.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment31.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1242.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 837.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 430.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment42.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment40.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1240.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 834.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 425.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 431.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment45.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 837.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1244.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1250.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment51.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 845.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 436.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 849.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1253.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment52.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 437.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.04495% CI: [1.01, 1.67]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.11, 1.84]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.13, 1.9]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.23, 2.08]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q HRQL total score at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 423.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 832.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1239.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment39.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1248.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 843.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 428.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment46.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment52.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1253.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 846.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 439.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 437.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment54.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 848.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1254.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1261.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment59.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 854.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 440.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 853.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1259.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment58.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 440.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline OAB-q HRQL total score as covariates.p-value: 0.09595% CI: [0.96, 1.59]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline OAB-q HRQL total score as covariates.p-value: 0.07395% CI: [0.98, 1.62]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline OAB-q HRQL total score as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.29, 2.13]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline OAB-q HRQL total score as covariates.p-value: 0.06795% CI: [0.98, 1.63]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q Symptom Bother score at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 428.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 839.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1245.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment45.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1255.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 850.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 434.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment54.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment58.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1259.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 851.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 445.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 444.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment62.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 856.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1263.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1266.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment65.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 863.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 447.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 863.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1269.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment68.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 452.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline OAB-q symptom bother scale as covariates.p-value: 0.38195% CI: [0.87, 1.45]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline OAB-q symptom bother scale as covariates.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [1.01, 1.7]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline OAB-q symptom bother scale as covariates.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.21, 2]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline OAB-q symptom bother scale as covariates.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.21, 2.03]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 423.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 835.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1240.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment40.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1251.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 844.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 427.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment48.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment53.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1254.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 850.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 437.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 434.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment56.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 851.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1256.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1262.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment59.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 853.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 439.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 857.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1265.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment63.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 442.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of lncontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: 0.2195% CI: [0.91, 1.52]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of lncontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.13, 1.89]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of lncontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.23, 2.06]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of lncontinence episodes per 24 hours and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.23, 2.05]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as triple responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per24 hours compared to baseline, minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the HRQL total score, and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 415.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 824.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1233.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment33.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1242.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 836.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 420.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment39.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment44.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1245.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 838.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 430.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 428.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment49.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 843.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1249.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1254.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment51.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 846.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 432.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 846.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1254.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment52.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 433.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours, baseline OAB-q HRQL total score and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: 0.41695% CI: [0.86, 1.43]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours, baseline OAB-q HRQL total score and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: 0.10595% CI: [0.96, 1.59]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours, baseline OAB-q HRQL total score and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.28, 2.16]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours, baseline OAB-q HRQL total score and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [1.12, 1.87]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as triple responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline, minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q Symptom Bother score, and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 417.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 829.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1235.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment36.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1247.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 841.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 424.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment45.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment48.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1249.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 843.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 433.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 431.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment53.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 847.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1254.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1258.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment56.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 851.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 437.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 854.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1262.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment60.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 440.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours, baseline OAB-q symptom bother scale and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: 0.33595% CI: [0.88, 1.46]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours, baseline OAB-q symptom bother scale and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: 0.00995% CI: [1.09, 1.81]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours, baseline OAB-q symptom bother scale and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.21, 2.02]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors, and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours, baseline OAB-q symptom bother scale and baseline PPBC as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.33, 2.21]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with ≥ 10 points improvement from baseline to each visit (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 445.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 851.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1257.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment56.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1262.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 862.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 452.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment61.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment68.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1269.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 865.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 459.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 461.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment71.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 866.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1271.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1276.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment74.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 871.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 462.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 869.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1271.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment71.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 461.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline OAB-q subscale as a covariate.p-value: 0.07795% CI: [0.97, 1.72]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline OAB-q subscale as a covariate.p-value: 0.32195% CI: [0.87, 1.53]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline OAB-q subscale as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.46, 2.53]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline OAB-q subscale as a covariate.p-value: 0.29495% CI: [0.88, 1.53]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with ≥ 10 points improvement from baseline to each visit (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 456.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 862.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1266.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment65.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1272.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 871.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 462.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment71.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment77.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1278.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 873.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 469.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 473.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment81.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 879.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1282.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1283.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment82.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 883.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 473.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 882.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1285.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment84.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 475.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline OAB-q subscale as a covariate.p-value: 0.22495% CI: [0.88, 1.69]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline OAB-q subscale as a covariate.p-value: 0.03795% CI: [1.02, 1.96]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline OAB-q subscale as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.47, 2.67]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline OAB-q subscale as a covariate.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.21, 2.26]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 448.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 856.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1259.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treaetment59.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1266.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 865.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 452.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treaetment65.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treaetment72.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1273.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 869.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 460.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 458.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treaetment71.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 872.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1274.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1276.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treaetment75.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 871.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 463.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 875.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1280.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treaetment78.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 462.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline PPBC as a covariate.p-value: 0.06595% CI: [0.98, 1.78]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline PPBC as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.24, 2.27]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline PPBC as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.32, 2.36]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline PPBC as a covariate.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.12, 2.04]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours at each time point (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 441.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 854.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1258.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment59.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1266.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 861.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 445.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment64.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment69.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1270.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 863.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 456.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 453.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment70.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 865.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1271.0 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1275.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment74.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 869.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 457.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 870.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1276.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment75.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 460.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the last 3 days as a covariate.p-value: 0.25195% CI: [0.89, 1.53]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the last 3 days as a covariate.p-value: 0.10795% CI: [0.95, 1.64]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the last 3 days as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.23, 2.07]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the last 3 days as a covariate.p-value: 0.01295% CI: [1.08, 1.85]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with a major (≥ 2 points) improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 415.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 827.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1229.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment29.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1239.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 833.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 420.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment37.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment40.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1242.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 835.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 422.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 427.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment42.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 840.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1244.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1250.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment49.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 842.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 431.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 846.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1252.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment51.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 431.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline PPBC as a covariate.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.11, 1.87]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline PPBC as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.28, 2.17]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline PPBC as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.34, 2.3]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline PPBC as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.29, 2.19]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with zero incontinence episodes per 24 hours postbaseline in the last 3 days prior to weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 423.2 percentage of particpants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 828.7 percentage of particpants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1238.0 percentage of particpants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment37.6 percentage of particpants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1242.5 percentage of particpants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 835.3 percentage of particpants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 424.9 percentage of particpants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment40.6 percentage of particpants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment46.3 percentage of particpants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1247.4 percentage of particpants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 840.7 percentage of particpants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 427.6 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 428.9 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment42.9 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 838.3 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1242.7 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1252.3 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment50.7 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 845.3 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 435.1 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 848.2 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1252.7 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment52.2 percentage of particpants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 437.3 percentage of particpants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the last 3 days as a covariate.p-value: 0.03595% CI: [1.02, 1.69]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the last 3 days as a covariate.p-value: 0.00995% CI: [1.09, 1.81]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the last 3 days as a covariate.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.16, 1.93]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the last 3 days as a covariate.p-value: 0.02395% CI: [1.04, 1.73]Logistic regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with zero incontinence episodes per 24 hours postbaseline in the last 7 days prior to weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 412.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 819.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1229.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment28.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1232.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 824.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 413.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment30.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment34.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1235.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 829.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 416.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 417.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment31.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 828.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1231.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1242.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment40.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 836.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 423.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 838.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 1243.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTEnd of treatment43.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoTWeek 426.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.13, 1.92]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.24, 2.11]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.22, 2.07]Logistic regression
Comparison: Odds ratio from a logistic regression model including treatment group, sex, age group (\<65, \>=65 years), previous OAB medication (yes, no) and geographic region as factors and baseline mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours as a covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.21, 2.04]Logistic regression
Secondary

PGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoT

The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).

Time frame: Week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FAS participants with available data were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EoT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally improved24.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally worse4.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse4.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much worse1.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change31.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much improved24.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved4.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved23.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment:No change32.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much improved4.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse1.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved23.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved8.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much improved8.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved28.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much improved28.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally improved21.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved21.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much worse0.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change27.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally worse2.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse2.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse0.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much worse0.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment:No change28.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved22.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment:No change27.7 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much worse1.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally improved22.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse1.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much improved7.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change27.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally worse2.4 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved29.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved7.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much improved29.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse2.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much improved31.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved7.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved31.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved24.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change25.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse1.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much improved7.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally improved24.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment:No change26.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally worse1.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much worse0.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally worse2.8 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved10.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment:No change24.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved20.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally improved20.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much worse0.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved33.4 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse2.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse0.5 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much improved33.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change23.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much improved10.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much worse0.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much improved14.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally improved21.3 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much worse0.1 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally worse2.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment:No change21.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: No change21.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Very much worse0.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Minimally worse2.7 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Minimally improved20.9 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTWeek 12: Much improved30.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Very much improved14.6 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much worse0.2 percentage of participants
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoTEnd of treatment: Much improved30.4 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026