Skip to content

Non-isotope Based Imaging Modalities vs Technetium-99m Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography(99mTcSPECT)

Non-isotope Based Imaging Modalities vs 99mTcSPECT to Detect Myocardial Ischemia in Patients at High Risk for Ischemic Cardiovascular Events

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01972360
Acronym
MITNECB5
Enrollment
467
Registered
2013-10-30
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2019-04-18
Last updated
2020-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Ischemia

Keywords

SPECT, CMR, High risk for ischemic cardiovascular events

Brief summary

SPECT is currently the dominant clinical test for diagnostic and prognostic purposes as well as therapeutic decision-making. Given the shortage of nuclear reactor-produced Tc, advancing the use of non-isotope based imaging modalities has the potential to change the standard of care for patients with CAD as each one of these technics (CMR, CT, Stress echocardiography) has its own distinct potential advantages over SPECT.

Detailed description

Obtain a better understanding of the clinical utility of advanced non-isotope-based imaging modalities to detect relevant CAD as potential alternatives to SPECT. Approximately 450 subjects will be enrolled in total. Three groups of about 150 patients per group. Each group will undergo imaging with 2 modalities; Group 1: 99mTcSPECT plus CMR, Group 2: 99mTcSPECT plus CT, Group 3:99mTcSPECT plus stress echocardiography. All 450 patients will undergo standard invasive coronary angiography following completion of non-invasive imaging, except for patients in whom both nuclear and non-nuclear imaging modalities reveal a normal result confirming the absence of significant coronary artery disease (i.e invasive angiography would not be clinically indicated and FFR would be considered to be above 0.8). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infraction (TIMI) flow will be measured in all patients undergoing angiography, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be measured in all patients except those with TIMI flow =0, 1 and 2. All imaging procedures must be completed within 6 weeks. All patients will have a follow-up visit at 6 months after enrollment. During the 6 month follow-up visit major adverse cardiovascular events will be collected and adjudicated by a clinical endpoint committee (CEC).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Montreal Heart Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 87 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clinically indicated request for SPECT * ability to undergo at least one of three non-nuclear imaging tests; CMR, CT or Stress Echocardiography * History of recent symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia * High risk for ischemic cardiovascular events

Exclusion criteria

* severely reduced systolic function (LV ejection fraction less than 35%) * Recent (less than 3 days) acute coronary syndrome including acute myocardial infarction * contraindications to dipyridamole SPECT including : i)severe reactive airway disease; ii) less than 3 days post Myocardial Infarction - Acute Coronary Syndrome (MI-ACS); iii) high-grade Atrioventricular block (AV block); iv)allergy to dipyridamole or theophylline; v) caffeine within 12 hours; vi) theophylline use within 48 hours; vii) severe claustrophobia; or viii) women who may be pregnant * kidney dysfunction (i.e estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 45) * use of investigational drug or device within 30 days of screening visit * Coronary Artery Bypass Graft(s) surgery (CABG)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modalitybaselineThe sensitivity is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality
Positive predictive value of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modalitybaselineThe positive predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly have significant CAD according to FFR
Negative predictive value of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modalityBaselineThe negative predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly does not have significant CAD according to FFR
Overall accuracy of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) according to non-invasive imaging modalitybaselineThe overall accuracy is calculated as the probability that a subject is correctly classified (presence of significant CAD or not) by non-invasive imaging modality. The standard of truth is presence of significant CAD or not according to the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR)
Specificity of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modalitybaselineThe specificity is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Sensitivity of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFRBaseline
Overall accuracy of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFRbaseline

Other

MeasureTime frame
Specificity of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFRbaseline
Negative predictive value of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)baseline
Positive predictive value of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFRbaseline
Negative predictive value of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFRbaseline
Overall accuracy of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)baseline
Sensitivity of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)baseline
Specificity of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)baseline
Positive predictive value of high-risk CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)baseline

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026