Skip to content

Effect of Two Osteopathic Techniques on Thickness of Paravertebral Muscles of the Lumbar Spine

Effect of Two Osteopathic Techniques on Thickness of Paravertebral Muscles of the Lumbar Spine: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01971983
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-10-30
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2014-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Low back pain, Spinal manipulation, Osteopathy, Muscle energy technique, Muscle thickness

Brief summary

The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to describe the effect of two osteopathic techniques - high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) and muscle energy (ME) - on thickness, activation, strength, pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the paravertebral muscles at the lumbar spine, as well as the peak plantar pressures immediately and after a two-day follow-up. The muscle thickness of the paravertebral muscles at the lumbar spine, namely internal oblique, external oblique and transversus abdominis can be altered after the application of 'high-velocity low-amplitude'(HVLA)and 'muscle energy' (ME)techniques immediately and after a two-day follow-up.

Interventions

OTHERHigh-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA)

With the subject lying on his/her side, the therapist will rotate the patient's trunk, flex his/her hip and knee of the upper leg. The therapist positions his caudad forearm over the hip, while the cephalad forearm lies over the patient's shoulder. The therapist's hands will be positioned over the lumbar spine's spinous process to be manipulated.

OTHERMuscle energy (ME)

This technique involves the active movement of the patient to activate a specific musculature in order to move a bony segment of a given joint in a specific direction in relation to the adjacent bone. This technique aims to restore the restricted movement of the joint in question.

OTHERSham

Individuals in this group received a sham intervention type, in order to simulate an intervention.

Sponsors

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least one episode of low back pain over the last three months; confirmation of lumbar spine dysfunction by an experienced osteopath; age between 18 and 40 years; do not have performed physical stress activities over the last 24 hours; do not be physically active (physical activity for at least three times a week); fulfill the orientations to the follow-up assessment.

Exclusion criteria

* History of surgery, fracture or fixation on the lumbar spine and/or the pelvis; being pregnant; signs of radiculopathy; disc herniation at the lumbar spine; degenerative process at the lumbar spine; have received any kind of manipulative treatments over the past four weeks;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle thicknessimmediateWe will evaluate the muscle thickness of four muscles that comprises the paravertebral musculature at the lumbar spine: internal oblique, external oblique, lumbar multifidus and transversus abdominis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure pain thresholdImmediatesubjects will be evaluated regarding their pressure pain threshold (PPT) on the spinous process of all of the lumbar vertebrae.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026