Skip to content

Dynamic Preload Parameters During Liver Transplantation

The Validity of Dynamic Preload Parameters During Liver Transplantation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01971333
Enrollment
80
Registered
2013-10-29
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2013-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Cirrhosis

Keywords

pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, plethysmographic variation index, fluid responsiveness

Brief summary

The arterial system compliance is compromised in liver cirrhotic patients. Dynamic preload variables are either pressure-based (e.g.pulse pressure variation; PPV), flow-based (e.g. stroke volume variation; SVV), or volume-based (plethysmographic variability index; PVI). It is not yet clear that dynamic preload parameters based on which mechanism will be accurate to predict fluid responsiveness in the cirrhotic patients. Therefore, this study aimed to claried which dynamic preload parameters would be more accurate during the liver transplantation.

Detailed description

Fluid management is crucial during liver transplantation. Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension have an altered blood volume distribution and pooling in the splanchnic circulation. Excess administration of intravenous fluid may increase portal hypertension due to splanchnic venous congestion and may also aggravate coagulopathy by dilution. On the other hand, fluid restriction may risk systemic and especially renal hypoperfusion. Traditional static fluid parameter, such as central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, have been reported inaccurate to predict fluid responsiveness. In comparison, the recent developed dynamic fluid parameters based on heart-lung interaction were reported to be good preload indicators in a variety of different surgical settings. However, the validity of such dynamic fluid parameters is highly dependent on The arterial system compliance is compromised in liver cirrhotic patients. Dynamic preload variables are either pressure-based (e.g.pulse pressure variation; PPV), flow-based (e.g. stroke volume variation; SVV), or volume-based (plethysmographic variability index; PVI). It is not yet clear that dynamic preload parameters based on which mechanism will be accurate to predict fluid responsiveness in the cirrhotic patients. Therefore, this study aimed to claried which dynamic preload parameters would be more accurate during the liver transplantation.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* End stage liver disease patients scheduled for liver transplantation in National Taiwan University Hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Allergic reaction * preexisting arrythmia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change of cardiac index after fluid loadingone day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Fluid responsiveness parameters: stroke volume variationone day
Fluid responsiveness parameters: plethysmographic variation indexone day
Fluid responsiveness parameters: pulse pressure variationone day

Other

MeasureTime frame
Central venous pressure changesone day
Heart rate changesone day
Mean arterial pressure changesone day

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactChun Yu Wu, M.D.
longersolo@gmail.com+886-2-23123456

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026