Liver Cirrhosis
Conditions
Keywords
pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, plethysmographic variation index, fluid responsiveness
Brief summary
The arterial system compliance is compromised in liver cirrhotic patients. Dynamic preload variables are either pressure-based (e.g.pulse pressure variation; PPV), flow-based (e.g. stroke volume variation; SVV), or volume-based (plethysmographic variability index; PVI). It is not yet clear that dynamic preload parameters based on which mechanism will be accurate to predict fluid responsiveness in the cirrhotic patients. Therefore, this study aimed to claried which dynamic preload parameters would be more accurate during the liver transplantation.
Detailed description
Fluid management is crucial during liver transplantation. Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension have an altered blood volume distribution and pooling in the splanchnic circulation. Excess administration of intravenous fluid may increase portal hypertension due to splanchnic venous congestion and may also aggravate coagulopathy by dilution. On the other hand, fluid restriction may risk systemic and especially renal hypoperfusion. Traditional static fluid parameter, such as central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, have been reported inaccurate to predict fluid responsiveness. In comparison, the recent developed dynamic fluid parameters based on heart-lung interaction were reported to be good preload indicators in a variety of different surgical settings. However, the validity of such dynamic fluid parameters is highly dependent on The arterial system compliance is compromised in liver cirrhotic patients. Dynamic preload variables are either pressure-based (e.g.pulse pressure variation; PPV), flow-based (e.g. stroke volume variation; SVV), or volume-based (plethysmographic variability index; PVI). It is not yet clear that dynamic preload parameters based on which mechanism will be accurate to predict fluid responsiveness in the cirrhotic patients. Therefore, this study aimed to claried which dynamic preload parameters would be more accurate during the liver transplantation.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* End stage liver disease patients scheduled for liver transplantation in National Taiwan University Hospital
Exclusion criteria
* Allergic reaction * preexisting arrythmia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change of cardiac index after fluid loading | one day |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Fluid responsiveness parameters: stroke volume variation | one day |
| Fluid responsiveness parameters: plethysmographic variation index | one day |
| Fluid responsiveness parameters: pulse pressure variation | one day |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Central venous pressure changes | one day |
| Heart rate changes | one day |
| Mean arterial pressure changes | one day |
Countries
Taiwan