Skip to content

Compare Sterilized Clean vs Sterilized Aseptic Dental Implant Surgery

Sterilized Aseptic Versus Sterilized Clean Field for Dental Implant Placement - Randomized Clinical Control Trial for Non-inferiority Comparison

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01970826
Enrollment
80
Registered
2013-10-28
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2013-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Loss, Endosseous Dental Implant Failure

Keywords

aseptic sterilized field, clean sterilized field, dental implants, Surgery

Brief summary

In patients that require dental implants , does performing the surgery in clean sterile field compared to aseptic field, produces more post-operatory complications, implant morbidity or patient discomfort ?

Detailed description

The investigators intend to compare two types of operatory room preparation (aseptic versus clean), used world wide, for placing dental implants. The investigators want to see if it has impact on post-operatory healing, osseointegration and success rate of dental implants. Before Study begins the investigators will perform inter-observer agreement in surgical preparation of the surgical suite, implant placements and operatory-room behavior.

Interventions

it will be measure the amount of time to perform the dental implant surgery. It will be measured from the time that the surgeon does the first incision until the last suture is made.

PROCEDURESingle Dental Implants

place single unit dental implants, 2 mm below crestal bone and follow manufacturer guidelines.

PROCEDURESterilized Aseptic

Operatory room will be prepared totally aseptic

PROCEDURESterilized Clean

Operatory room will be prepared clean but not aseptic

PROCEDUREFull-Mouth Dental Implants

dental implants for full-mouth implant rehabilitation.

PROCEDUREPartial Rehabilitation

two or more implants to support partial rehabilitation

Sponsors

Implantology Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All surgeries schedule for implant placement

Exclusion criteria

* Surgeries not made with local anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-Operatory ComplicationsFrom Implant Placement (Baseline) to 4 weeks after (T1)Measure the amount of adverse effects in both groups (aseptic vs clean) that happen between time frame baseline to 4 weeks.
OsseointegrationAt 8 weeks (T2) after BaselineMeasure the ability of dental implants to integrate into bone in both groups (aseptic vs clean)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal bone lossAt Final Restoration placement - Expected Average of 12 Weeks after baselinemeasure the amount of marginal bone loss at the time of final restoration placement
Patient SatisfactionAt 2 weeksmeasure the amount of post-operatory discomfort of the patient

Countries

Portugal

Contacts

Primary ContactAndré Chen, Msc
tsouchen@gmail.com00351919774343

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026