Skip to content

Momelotinib Versus Ruxolitinib in Subjects With Myelofibrosis

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Active-controlled Study Evaluating Momelotinib vs. Ruxolitinib in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) or Post-Polycythemia Vera or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (Post-PV/ET MF)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01969838
Acronym
Simplify 1
Enrollment
432
Registered
2013-10-25
Start date
2013-12-06
Completion date
2019-05-02
Last updated
2023-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis

Brief summary

This study is to determine the efficacy of momelotinib (MMB) versus ruxolitinib (RUX) in participants with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) or post-polycythemia vera or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF) who have not yet received treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAK inhibitor). Participants will be randomized to receive either MMB or ruxolitinib for 24 weeks during a double-blind treatment phase, after which they will be eligible to receive open-label MMB for up to an additional 216 weeks. After discontinuation of study medication, assessments will continue for 12 additional weeks, after which participants will be contacted for survival follow-up approximately every 6 months for up to 5 years from the date of enrollment or until study termination. For those participants planning to continue treatment with MMB following the end of the study, the Early Study Drug Discontinuation (ESDD), 30-day, 12-Week, and survival follow-up visits are not required.

Interventions

DRUGRuxolitinib

Ruxolitinib tablets administered orally twice daily

Placebo to match momelotinib tablets administered orally once daily

Momelotinib tablet administered orally once daily

DRUGPlacebo to match ruxolitinib

Placebo to match ruxolitinib tablets administered orally twice daily

Sponsors

Sierra Oncology LLC - a GSK company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Palpable splenomegaly at least 5 cm below the left costal margin * Confirmed diagnosis of PMF or post-PV/ET MF * Requires myelofibrosis therapy, in the opinion of the investigator * Classified as high risk OR intermediate-2 risk as defined by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for PMF, or intermediate-1 risk (IPSS) associated with symptomatic splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, anemia (hemoglobin \< 10.0 g/dL), and/or unresponsive to available therapy * Acceptable laboratory assessment obtained within 14 days prior to the first dose of study drug: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 0.75 x 10\^9/L in the absence of growth factor in the prior 7 days * Platelet Count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L (≥ 100 x 10\^9/L if aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] or alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] is ≥ 2 x the upper limit of the normal range \[ULN\]) in the absence of platelet transfusion(s) or thrombopoietin mimetics in the prior 7 days * Peripheral blood blast count \< 10% * AST and ALT ≤ 3 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN if liver is involved by extramedullary hematopoiesis as judged by the investigator or if related to iron chelator therapy that was started within the prior 60 days) * Calculated creatinine clearance (CrCL) of ≥ 45 mL/min * Direct bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x ULN * Life expectancy of \> 24 weeks * Males and females of childbearing potential must agree to use protocol-specified method(s) of contraception * Females who are nursing must agree to discontinue nursing before the first dose of study drug * Able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent form Key

Exclusion criteria

* Prior splenectomy * Splenic irradiation within 3 months prior to the first dose of study drug * Eligible for allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation * Uncontrolled inter-current illness, per protocol. * Known positive status for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Chronic active or acute viral hepatitis A, B, or C infection, or a hepatitis B or C carrier * Prior use of a JAK1 or JAK2 inhibitor * Use of chemotherapy, immunomodulating therapy, biologic therapy, radiation therapy, or investigational therapy within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug * Presence of peripheral neuropathy ≥ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 2 * Unwilling or unable to undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Splenic Response Rate at Week 24Week 24Splenic response rate at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a spleen volume reduction of ≥ 35% from baseline at the Week 24 assessment as measured by MRI or CT.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24Week 24Total symptom score (TSS) is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a ≥50% reduction in TSS at Week 24 versus baseline as measured by the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) v2.0 diary. Response rate was calculated using the average of the daily TSS from a consecutive 28-day period prior to Week 24, which had ≥20 daily TSS available. The modified MPN-SAF patient-reported outcome instrument consisted of 8 items assessing worst daily incidence of tiredness, filling up quickly, abdominal discomfort, night sweats, itching, bone pain, pain under ribs on left side, and inactivity. Scoring of the Total Symptom Score (TSS), in this study was based on 7 of these items, (range of 0-70,), excluding inactivity. These items assess the impact experienced by the participant in the 24 hours prior to completing the questionnaire. All items are measured using a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 corresponding to Absent and 10 being the worse
Rate of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions in the Double-blind Phase, (the Average Number of RBC Units Transfused Per Month Not Associated With Overt Bleeding)Baseline to Week 24Rate of RBC transfusion was defined as the average number of RBC units transfused not associated with clinically overt bleeding per subject-month during the double-blind phase.
RBC Transfusion Independence Rate at Week 24, (Defined as Absence of RBC Transfusions and no Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 24, Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)Week 24RBC transfusion independence is the percentage of participants who are transfusion independent at Week 24, defined as absence of RBC transfusions and no hemoglobin level below 8 g/dL in the 12 weeks prior to Week 24, excluding cases associated with clinically overt bleeding.
RBC Transfusion Dependence Rate at Week 24. (Defined as Having Had at Least 4 Units of RBC Transfusions, or a Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in 8 Weeks Prior to Week 24 (Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)).Week 24RBC transfusion dependence is the percentage of participants who are transfusion dependent at Week 24, defined as having had at least 4 units of RBC transfusions, or a hemoglobin level below 8 g/dL in 8 weeks prior to Week 24 (excluding cases associated with clinically overt bleeding). Participants with the last double-blind phase participation date prior to Day 162 (ie. missing at Week 24) were considered transfusion dependent at Week 24.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

432 participants were randomized at 131 centers in 22 countries.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were screened within 35 days after signing the informed consent form to determine eligibility for participation in the study. Participants who were not randomized within the 35 day screening window were screen failed. At randomization, participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to MMB plus RUX-placebo or RUX plus MMB-placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Momelotinib (MMB)
Participants received momelotinib plus placebo to match ruxolitinib. Momelotinib: Momelotinib tablets were administered orally once daily at a starting dose of 200 mg. Additional available strengths included 100 mg and 150 mg. Placebo to match ruxolitinib: Placebo to match ruxolitinib tablets were administered orally twice daily.
215
Ruxolitinib (RUX)
Participants received ruxolitinib plus placebo to match momelotinib. Ruxolitinib: Ruxolitinib tablets were administered orally twice daily. The dose ranged from 5 to 20 mg BID and was dependent on platelet count, creatinine clearance, and transaminase levels. Placebo to match momelotinib: Placebo to match momelotinib tablets were administered orally once daily
217
Total432

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double-blind PhaseAdverse Event10400
Double-blind PhaseDeath5200
Double-blind PhaseDisease Progression2000
Double-blind PhasePhysician Decision5100
Double-blind PhaseSubject Decision4200
Double-blind PhaseSymptomatic Spleen Growth1000
Open-label PhaseAdverse Event003749
Open-label PhaseDeath001311
Open-label PhaseDisease Progression002627
Open-label PhaseLack of Efficacy001719
Open-label PhaseNon-compliance with Study Drug0020
Open-label PhasePhysician Decision00914
Open-label PhaseSubject Decision001415
Open-label PhaseTransferred to study SRA-MMB-4365005262

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMomelotinib (MMB)Ruxolitinib (RUX)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
125 Participants122 Participants247 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
90 Participants95 Participants185 Participants
Age, Continuous67 years66 years66 years
BMI24.6 kg/m^224.9 kg/m^224.6 kg/m^2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
191 Participants194 Participants385 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
18 Participants19 Participants37 Participants
Height170.0 cm170.0 cm170.0 cm
Hemoglobin10.5 g/dL10.3 g/dL10.4 g/dL
Platelet Count (10^9/L)
< 100
18 Participants23 Participants41 Participants
Platelet Count (10^9/L)
>= 100 and <= 200
66 Participants63 Participants129 Participants
Platelet Count (10^9/L)
> 200
131 Participants131 Participants262 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
17 Participants20 Participants37 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Permitted
15 Participants16 Participants31 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
179 Participants178 Participants357 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
91 Participants97 Participants188 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
124 Participants120 Participants244 Participants
Transfusion Dependent
No
162 Participants165 Participants327 Participants
Transfusion Dependent
Yes
53 Participants52 Participants105 Participants
Weight69.3 kg71.4 kg70.0 kg

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 2146 / 21644 / 17154 / 197
other
Total, other adverse events
197 / 214206 / 216153 / 171188 / 197
serious
Total, serious adverse events
49 / 21439 / 21679 / 17179 / 197

Outcome results

Primary

Splenic Response Rate at Week 24

Splenic response rate at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a spleen volume reduction of ≥ 35% from baseline at the Week 24 assessment as measured by MRI or CT.

Time frame: Week 24

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Momelotinib (MMB)Splenic Response Rate at Week 24Nonresponder158 Participants
Momelotinib (MMB)Splenic Response Rate at Week 24Responder57 Participants
Ruxolitinib (RUX)Splenic Response Rate at Week 24Nonresponder153 Participants
Ruxolitinib (RUX)Splenic Response Rate at Week 24Responder64 Participants
p-value: 0.01495% CI: [0.02, 0.16]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Rate of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions in the Double-blind Phase, (the Average Number of RBC Units Transfused Per Month Not Associated With Overt Bleeding)

Rate of RBC transfusion was defined as the average number of RBC units transfused not associated with clinically overt bleeding per subject-month during the double-blind phase.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Momelotinib (MMB)Rate of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions in the Double-blind Phase, (the Average Number of RBC Units Transfused Per Month Not Associated With Overt Bleeding)0.0 units/month
Ruxolitinib (RUX)Rate of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions in the Double-blind Phase, (the Average Number of RBC Units Transfused Per Month Not Associated With Overt Bleeding)0.4 units/month
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.19, 0.43]Negative Binomial Model, Adjusted
Secondary

RBC Transfusion Dependence Rate at Week 24. (Defined as Having Had at Least 4 Units of RBC Transfusions, or a Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in 8 Weeks Prior to Week 24 (Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)).

RBC transfusion dependence is the percentage of participants who are transfusion dependent at Week 24, defined as having had at least 4 units of RBC transfusions, or a hemoglobin level below 8 g/dL in 8 weeks prior to Week 24 (excluding cases associated with clinically overt bleeding). Participants with the last double-blind phase participation date prior to Day 162 (ie. missing at Week 24) were considered transfusion dependent at Week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Momelotinib (MMB)RBC Transfusion Dependence Rate at Week 24. (Defined as Having Had at Least 4 Units of RBC Transfusions, or a Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in 8 Weeks Prior to Week 24 (Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)).Dependent65 Participants
Momelotinib (MMB)RBC Transfusion Dependence Rate at Week 24. (Defined as Having Had at Least 4 Units of RBC Transfusions, or a Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in 8 Weeks Prior to Week 24 (Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)).Nondependent150 Participants
Ruxolitinib (RUX)RBC Transfusion Dependence Rate at Week 24. (Defined as Having Had at Least 4 Units of RBC Transfusions, or a Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in 8 Weeks Prior to Week 24 (Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)).Dependent87 Participants
Ruxolitinib (RUX)RBC Transfusion Dependence Rate at Week 24. (Defined as Having Had at Least 4 Units of RBC Transfusions, or a Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in 8 Weeks Prior to Week 24 (Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)).Nondependent130 Participants
p-value: 0.01995% CI: [-0.19, -0.02]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

RBC Transfusion Independence Rate at Week 24, (Defined as Absence of RBC Transfusions and no Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 24, Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)

RBC transfusion independence is the percentage of participants who are transfusion independent at Week 24, defined as absence of RBC transfusions and no hemoglobin level below 8 g/dL in the 12 weeks prior to Week 24, excluding cases associated with clinically overt bleeding.

Time frame: Week 24

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Momelotinib (MMB)RBC Transfusion Independence Rate at Week 24, (Defined as Absence of RBC Transfusions and no Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 24, Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)Responder143 Participants
Momelotinib (MMB)RBC Transfusion Independence Rate at Week 24, (Defined as Absence of RBC Transfusions and no Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 24, Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)Nonresponder72 Participants
Ruxolitinib (RUX)RBC Transfusion Independence Rate at Week 24, (Defined as Absence of RBC Transfusions and no Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 24, Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)Responder107 Participants
Ruxolitinib (RUX)RBC Transfusion Independence Rate at Week 24, (Defined as Absence of RBC Transfusions and no Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 24, Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)Nonresponder110 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.09, 0.26]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24

Total symptom score (TSS) is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a ≥50% reduction in TSS at Week 24 versus baseline as measured by the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) v2.0 diary. Response rate was calculated using the average of the daily TSS from a consecutive 28-day period prior to Week 24, which had ≥20 daily TSS available. The modified MPN-SAF patient-reported outcome instrument consisted of 8 items assessing worst daily incidence of tiredness, filling up quickly, abdominal discomfort, night sweats, itching, bone pain, pain under ribs on left side, and inactivity. Scoring of the Total Symptom Score (TSS), in this study was based on 7 of these items, (range of 0-70,), excluding inactivity. These items assess the impact experienced by the participant in the 24 hours prior to completing the questionnaire. All items are measured using a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 corresponding to Absent and 10 being the worse

Time frame: Week 24

Population: TSS rate analysis at Week 24 only included participants with TSS \> 0 at baseline or with TSS = 0 at baseline but with TSS \> 0 or missing at Week 24.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Momelotinib (MMB)Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24Responder60 Participants
Momelotinib (MMB)Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24Nonresponder151 Participants
Ruxolitinib (RUX)Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24Responder89 Participants
Ruxolitinib (RUX)Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24Nonresponder122 Participants
p-value: 0.9895% CI: [-0.08, 0.08]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026