Skip to content

Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Angioplasty With Provisional Use of Nitinol Stent Versus Systematic Implantation of Paclitaxel-eluting Stent for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal de Novo Lesions

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01969630
Enrollment
250
Registered
2013-10-25
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Artery Disease

Keywords

femoropopliteal lesions

Brief summary

To determine in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions whether percutaneous revascularization with paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty (PEB) and provisional nitinol stent is superior with respect to the 12-month incidence of restenosis compared to treatment with systematic paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) angioplasty

Interventions

DEVICEPEB

Paclitaxel eluting balloon angioplasty plus provisional nitinol stent implantation

DEVICEPES

Systematic Paclitaxel eluting stent angioplasty

Sponsors

Ospedale San Donato
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia * de novo stenosis ≥ 50% or occlusion of at least 40 mm in length located in femoropopliteal arteries * presence of a clear healthy segment between the lesion in superficial femoral and common femoral artery and between popliteal and tibioperoneal trunk * presence of at least 1 patent tibial vessel with distal run-off (below-the-knee artery was considered patent if free from obstructive lesions determining angiographic stenosis \>70%)

Exclusion criteria

* life expectancy \<1 year * contraindication for combined antiplatelet therapy or known allergy to nickel or paclitaxel * need for major amputation (MA) at the time of enrolment * Failure to recanalize intended below-the-knee arteries in CLI patients at risk of major amputation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
angiographic binary restenosis12 monthsincidence of binary restenosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of all cause mortality, major amputation and target lesion revascularization.12 monthsincidence of composite endpoint of all cause mortality, major amputation and target lesion revascularization.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026