Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of IQP-MM-101 in Reducing Symptoms of Diarrhoea

Open Label Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of IQP-MM-101 in Reducing Symptoms of Diarrhoea

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01969214
Enrollment
101
Registered
2013-10-25
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2020-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diarrhoea

Brief summary

Diosmectite in IQP-MM-101 has been used for diarrhoea control. Backed by data from several studies demonstrating their efficacy, the investigators are conducting this study to look into the efficacy and safety of IQP-MM-101 in diarrhoea control.

Detailed description

The clinical study was intended to evaluate the safety and the potential reduction of diarrhoea recovery time post 1st intake of IQP-MM-101 in an open label, single arm, multicentre study over a 72 hours period. There were 2 clinic visits: the screening visit and final visit. At baseline visit (visit 1), written informed consents were collected. Each patients were given a diary and the following data were collected: demographics, vital signs, physical examination results, use of concomitant medication, previous medical history, and case history of the acute diarrhoea episode including date of first watery stool, number of stools over the past 24 hours, and presence of other associated symptoms over the past 24 hours (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain). Subjects recorded the following data in the diary: date and hour of bowel movement, stool consistency (Bristol stool scale) presence of symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and study IP consumption (number, date, and time of tablets taken) and time of vomiting (if any) each day during the treatment period. Additionally, subjects recorded the time absent from work and a subjective evaluation of their energy for everyday life. Visit 2 took place after 72 hours treatment period. Following data was collected: * Vital signs, physical examination * Adverse events * Use of concomitant medication * Compliance (returned IP and diary) * Global evaluation of efficacy and safety by subjects and investigators During the 72-hour treatment period, all subjects were instructed to consumed IQP-MM-101 according to the following dosage: one (1) tablet, three (3) times a day dissolved in at least 125mL (half a glass) of water.

Interventions

DEVICEIQP-MM-101

Dissolve the effervescent tablets in half a glass of water, to be taken orally 1 tablet, 3 times a day

Sponsors

InQpharm Group
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 65 years * Good general health * Acute diarrhoea episode defined as at least three watery stools per 24 hours over a period of 48 hours or less * Acute diarrhoea of presumed infectious origin * Patients with usually normal bowel movements (defecations) before onset of diarrhoea, that is, at least three normal stools per week and three or less normal stools per day * Negative pregnancy test (ß HCG-test) for women with child bearing potential * Written informed consent is a prerequisite for subject enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Known sensitivity to the ingredients of the device * Fever \>38,5◦C * Blood or pus in stools * Dehydration requiring intravenous rehydration * History of chronic diarrhoea (three or more loose or watery stools per day for at least 12 weeks, consecutive or not, in the preceding 12 months) * Use of antidiarrhoeal agents over the month prior to baseline * Diarrhoea possibly induced by antibiotics, laxative agents, thyroid hormones, or colchicine * Irritable bowel syndrome * Any other acute or chronic disease that could interfere with the evaluation of study device * Females who are pregnant or lactating * Subjects who have participated in another clinical trial in the 30 days before treatment period * Inability to comply * Presence of other factor(s) that, in the investigator's judgement, should preclude subject participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time (in Hours) Between the 1st Intake of IQP-MM-101 and First Formed or Hard Stool (Type 6 to 1) Followed by a Non Watery Stool (Type 6 to 1)96 hoursIn essence the definition of recovery would be two consecutive non-watery stool (type 6 to 1) when stool before 1st intake of IQP-MM-101 is primarily watery (type 7).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Daily Defecation96 hours
Number of Watery Stools96 hours
Stool Frequency96 hoursThe mean number of daily defecation.
Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)72 hours
Abdominal Pain96 hoursSubjects feeling of abdominal pain was measured on visual analog scale of 0 - 100mm (no pain to severe pain).
Time Off From Work1 week
Time (Hours) From the First Intake to the Last Watery Stool96 hoursThe last watery stool was assumed as the first-non watery stool
Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and Investigators96 hoursThe subjects and investigators will evaluate independently the safety of the investigational device (global scaled evaluation with very good, good, moderate and poor).
Occurrence of Adverse Events (AEs)96 hours
Associated Symptoms Such as Vomiting96 hours
Stool Consistency96 hoursStool consistency is measured by Bristol Stool Form Scale 1-7. 1. Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) 2. Sausage-shaped, but lumpy 3. Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface 4. Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft 5. Soft blobs with clear cut edges (easy to pass) 6. Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool 7. Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid Stool consistency is the mean of the scale measured each day.
Severity of Nausea96 hoursSubjects feeling of nausea was measured on visual analog scale of 0 - 100mm (no nausea to severe nausea).
Evaluation of Subjects' Energy Level96 hoursThe subjective measure of subjects' daily energy level was determined by severity of weakness felt by the subjects, measured on visual analog scale (0-100mm, 100mm being most severe weakness).

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IQP-MM-101
Dissolve the effervescent tablets in half a glass of water,to be taken orally 1 tablet, 3 times a day IQP-MM-101: Dissolve the effervescent tablets in half a glass of water, to be taken orally 1 tablet, 3 times a day
86
Total86

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIQP-MM-101
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
86 Participants
Age, Continuous35.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Region of Enrollment
Germany
86 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 99

Outcome results

Primary

Time (in Hours) Between the 1st Intake of IQP-MM-101 and First Formed or Hard Stool (Type 6 to 1) Followed by a Non Watery Stool (Type 6 to 1)

In essence the definition of recovery would be two consecutive non-watery stool (type 6 to 1) when stool before 1st intake of IQP-MM-101 is primarily watery (type 7).

Time frame: 96 hours

Population: 6 participants recovered before first intake of IQP-MM-101, while in another, there was no defecation reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IQP-MM-101Time (in Hours) Between the 1st Intake of IQP-MM-101 and First Formed or Hard Stool (Type 6 to 1) Followed by a Non Watery Stool (Type 6 to 1)21.30 hoursStandard Deviation 16.02
Secondary

Abdominal Pain

Subjects feeling of abdominal pain was measured on visual analog scale of 0 - 100mm (no pain to severe pain).

Time frame: 96 hours

Population: All 86 subjects recorded abdominal pain on day 1 and day 2. 85 subjects recorded abdominal pain on day 3 and 67 subjects recorded abdominal pain on day 4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IQP-MM-101Abdominal PainSeverity of abdominal pain Day 156.2 mmStandard Deviation 23.6
IQP-MM-101Abdominal PainSeverity of abdominal pain Day 235.3 mmStandard Deviation 20.8
IQP-MM-101Abdominal PainSeverity of abdominal pain Day 318.7 mmStandard Deviation 16.7
IQP-MM-101Abdominal PainSeverity of abdominal pain Day 411.1 mmStandard Deviation 14.3
Secondary

Associated Symptoms Such as Vomiting

Time frame: 96 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IQP-MM-101Associated Symptoms Such as VomitingAffected subjects at day 123.3 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Associated Symptoms Such as VomitingAffected subjects at day 23.5 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Associated Symptoms Such as VomitingAffected subjects at day 33.5 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Associated Symptoms Such as VomitingAffected subjects at day 43.5 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Evaluation of Subjects' Energy Level

The subjective measure of subjects' daily energy level was determined by severity of weakness felt by the subjects, measured on visual analog scale (0-100mm, 100mm being most severe weakness).

Time frame: 96 hours

Population: Only 85 subjects responded to Day 3 and only 67 subjects responded to Day 4 assessment of weakness

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IQP-MM-101Evaluation of Subjects' Energy LevelSeverity of Weakness Day 167.5 mmStandard Deviation 21.5
IQP-MM-101Evaluation of Subjects' Energy LevelSeverity of Weakness Day 245.7 mmStandard Deviation 24.7
IQP-MM-101Evaluation of Subjects' Energy LevelSeverity of Weakness Day 329.5 mmStandard Deviation 24.6
IQP-MM-101Evaluation of Subjects' Energy LevelSeverity of Weakness Day 416.8 mmStandard Deviation 19.7
Secondary

Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and Investigators

The subjects and investigators will evaluate independently the safety of the investigational device (global scaled evaluation with very good, good, moderate and poor).

Time frame: 96 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsEfficacy by Investigator - Very Good21 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsEfficacy by Investigator - Good61 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsEfficacy by Investigator - Moderate2 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsEfficacy by Investigator - Poor2 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsEfficacy by Subjects - Very Good28 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsEfficacy by Subjects - Good54 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsEfficacy by Subjects - Moderate2 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsEfficacy by Subjects - Poor2 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsSafety by Investigator - Very Good51 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsSafety by Investigator - Good34 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsSafety by Investigator - Moderate1 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsSafety by Investigator - Poor0 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsSafety by Subjects - Very Good50 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsSafety by Subjects - Good36 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsSafety by Subjects - Moderate0 participants
IQP-MM-101Global Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy by Subjects and InvestigatorsSafety by Subjects - Poor0 participants
Secondary

Number of Daily Defecation

Time frame: 96 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IQP-MM-101Number of Daily DefecationDay 1387 stools
IQP-MM-101Number of Daily DefecationDay 2278 stools
IQP-MM-101Number of Daily DefecationDay 3200 stools
IQP-MM-101Number of Daily DefecationDay 482 stools
Secondary

Number of Watery Stools

Time frame: 96 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IQP-MM-101Number of Watery StoolsDay 410 stools
IQP-MM-101Number of Watery StoolsDay 1292 stools
IQP-MM-101Number of Watery StoolsDay 272 stools
IQP-MM-101Number of Watery StoolsDay 320 stools
Secondary

Occurrence of Adverse Events (AEs)

Time frame: 96 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IQP-MM-101Occurrence of Adverse Events (AEs)7 Adverse Events
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)

Time frame: 72 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IQP-MM-101Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)Recovery time: Up to 24 hours25.3 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)Recovery time: More than 24 up to 30 hours21.5 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)Recovery time: More than 30 up to 36 hours8.9 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)Recovery time: More than 36 up to 42 hours7.6 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)Recovery time: More than 42 up to 48 hours16.5 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)Recovery time: More than 48 up to 60 hours10.1 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)Recovery time: More than 60 up to 72 hours8.9 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Percentage of Patients Having Recovered Within a Certain Time Period (Defined as Having Achieved the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)Recovery time: More than 72 hours1.3 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Severity of Nausea

Subjects feeling of nausea was measured on visual analog scale of 0 - 100mm (no nausea to severe nausea).

Time frame: 96 hours

Population: All 86 subjects recorded nausea on day 1 and day 2. 85 subjects recorded nausea on day 3 and 67 subjects recorded nausea on day 4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IQP-MM-101Severity of NauseaSeverity of nausea Day 144.8 mmStandard Deviation 29.5
IQP-MM-101Severity of NauseaSeverity of nausea Day 228.1 mmStandard Deviation 23.4
IQP-MM-101Severity of NauseaSeverity of nausea Day 312.9 mmStandard Deviation 16
IQP-MM-101Severity of NauseaSeverity of nausea Day 48.3 mmStandard Deviation 13.7
Secondary

Stool Consistency

Stool consistency is measured by Bristol Stool Form Scale 1-7. 1. Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) 2. Sausage-shaped, but lumpy 3. Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface 4. Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft 5. Soft blobs with clear cut edges (easy to pass) 6. Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool 7. Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid Stool consistency is the mean of the scale measured each day.

Time frame: 96 hours

Population: 387, 278, 200 and 82 stool samples were obtained on day 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IQP-MM-101Stool ConsistencyType of Stool Day 16.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
IQP-MM-101Stool ConsistencyType of Stool Day 25.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
IQP-MM-101Stool ConsistencyType of Stool Day 34.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
IQP-MM-101Stool ConsistencyType of Stool Day 43.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Secondary

Stool Frequency

The mean number of daily defecation.

Time frame: 96 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IQP-MM-101Stool FrequencyStool Frequency Day 14.50 No. of daily defecationStandard Deviation 2.57
IQP-MM-101Stool FrequencyStool Frequency Day 23.23 No. of daily defecationStandard Deviation 1.9
IQP-MM-101Stool FrequencyStool Frequency Day 32.33 No. of daily defecationStandard Deviation 1.58
IQP-MM-101Stool FrequencyStool Frequency Day 40.95 No. of daily defecationStandard Deviation 1.03
Secondary

Time (Hours) From the First Intake to the Last Watery Stool

The last watery stool was assumed as the first-non watery stool

Time frame: 96 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IQP-MM-101Time (Hours) From the First Intake to the Last Watery Stool18.17 HoursStandard Deviation 15.85
Secondary

Time Off From Work

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IQP-MM-101Time Off From WorkMore than 6 days of absent8.1 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Time Off From Work2 days of absent11.6 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Time Off From Work3 days of absent7.0 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Time Off From Work4 days of absent12.8 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Time Off From Work5 days of absent24.4 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Time Off From Work0 day of absent31.4 Percentage of subjects
IQP-MM-101Time Off From Work1 day of absent4.7 Percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026