Skip to content

Randomized Clinical Trial Of Bococizumab (PF-04950615; RN316) In Subjects With Hyperlipidemia Or Mixed Dyslipidemia At Risk Of Cardiovascular Events

A Phase 3 Double-blind,Randomized, Placebo-controlled,Parallel-group Study To Assess The Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pf-04950615 In Subjects With Primary Hyperlipidemia Or Mixed Dyslipidemia At Risk Of Cardiovascular Events

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01968954
Acronym
SPIRE-HR
Enrollment
711
Registered
2013-10-24
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlipidemia

Keywords

mixed dyslipidemia, high risk of cardiovascular events

Brief summary

This study is a multicenter, randomized study in subjects with high cholesterol receiving highly effective statins to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Bococizumab (PF-04950615;RN316) to lower LDL-C.

Interventions

150 mg every 2 weeks, subcutaneous injection, 12 months

OTHERPlacebo

subcutaneous injection, every 2 weeks for 12 months

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Treated with a statin. * Fasting LDL-C \> 70 mg/dL and triglyceride \<=400 mg/dL. * High or very high risk of incurring a cardiovascular event.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding females. * Cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event of procedures during the past 30 days. * Congestive heart failure NYHA class IV. * Poorly controlled hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Plasma PF-04950615 Concentrations at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12, 24, 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Type 1 or 3 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site ReactionsBaseline up to the end of study (up to 58 weeks)Type 1 hypersensitivity or allergic reactions were possible in response to any injected protein and included shortness of breath, urticaria, anaphylaxis and angioedema. Type 3 hypersensitivity reactions were similar to Type 1 hypersensitivity reactions but were likely to be delayed from the time of injection and included symptoms such as rash, urticaria, polyarthritis, myalgia's, polysynovitis, fever and if severe then included glomerulonephritis as well. Injection site reactions included injection site bruising, discolouration, erythema, haematoma, haemorrhage, nodule, induration, pain, pruritus and rash. Participants with type 1 or type 3 hypersensitivity reactions and participants with injection site reactions were reported in this outcome measure.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb)Baseline up to the end of study (up to 58 weeks)Percentage of participants with at least 1 positive ADA titer or 1 positive nAb titer were reported. Participants with their ADA titer \>=6.23 were considered to be ADA positive and participants with their nAb titer \>=1.58 were considered to be nAb positive.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12 in Participants With Primary HyperlipidemiaBaseline, Week 12Participants with primary hyperlipidemia are defined as participants with triglycerides (TG) level less than (\<) 200 milligram per decilitre (mg/dL) (2.26 millimoles per litre \[mmol/L\]) at pre-randomization.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12 in Participants With Mixed DyslipidemiaBaseline, Week 12Participants with mixed dyslipidemia are defined as TG level greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L) at pre-randomization.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52Baseline, Week 24, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offBaseline, Week 24, 52Percent change from baseline in fasting LDL-C among participants with TG cut-off of \<200 mg/dL and \>=200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L) were reported in this outcome measure.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffBaseline, Week 12Absolute change from baseline among participants with TG cut-off of \<200 mg/dL and \>=200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L) were reported in this outcome measure.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 100 Milligram Per Deciliter (2.59 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 70 Milligram Per Deciliter (1.81 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12, 24 and 52

Other

MeasureTime frame
Absolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Countries

Australia, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Poland, South Korea, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matched to PF-04950615 subcutaneous injection once in every 2 weeks over a period of 52 weeks. Participants were followed up to 58 weeks.
354
PF-04950615 150 mg
Participants received single dose of PF-04950615 150 mg subcutaneous injection once in every 2 weeks over a period of 52 weeks. Participants were followed up to 58 weeks.
357
Total711

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event63
Overall StudyDeath12
Overall StudyDid not met inclusion criteria02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up64
Overall StudyOther78
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2023

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPF-04950615 150 mgTotal
Age, Continuous61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Sex: Female, Male
Female
130 Participants136 Participants266 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
224 Participants221 Participants445 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
185 / 353205 / 356
serious
Total, serious adverse events
40 / 35345 / 356

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 121.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.89
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12-55.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.17
Comparison: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals and p values from an MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-61, -53.1]Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM)
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-0.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.32
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 335)2.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.87
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 313)0.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 20.59
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)94.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.51
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)95.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 25.57
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-47.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 28.4
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 313)-36.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 32.23
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 335)-43.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 29.95
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-50.7, -43.8]
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =353, 357)114.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.22
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =329, 336)-0.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.55
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 336)5.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 33.14
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =311, 313)3.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 32.17
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =311, 313)-45.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 46.43
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =353, 357)115.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.99
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 336)-56.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 39.34
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =329, 336)-63.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 39
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-68, -58.8]
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-Off

Absolute change from baseline among participants with TG cut-off of \<200 mg/dL and \>=200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L) were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized.'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffTG <200 mg/dL: Baseline (n =282, 282)111.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.28
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffTG <200 mg/dL: Change at Week12 (n =262, 266)0.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.6
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffTG >=200 mg/dL: Baseline (n =71, 75)126.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42.07
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffTG >=200 mg/dL: Change at Week 12 (n =67, 70)-2.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 26.98
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffTG >=200 mg/dL: Change at Week 12 (n =67, 70)-63.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 44.91
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffTG <200 mg/dL: Baseline (n =282, 282)112.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 36.42
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffTG >=200 mg/dL: Baseline (n =71, 75)125.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42.1
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) at Week 12 by Trigylceride Cut-OffTG <200 mg/dL: Change at Week12 (n =262, 266)-63.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.38
Comparison: TG \<200 mg/dL (Week 12): LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region.95% CI: [-69.1, -59.2]
Comparison: TG \>=200 mg/dL (Week 12): LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region.95% CI: [-71.4, -47.7]
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)48.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.52
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)0.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.5
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =329, 336)-0.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.9
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =312, 314)0.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.59
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =312, 314)2.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.32
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)49.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.23
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =329, 336)3.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.41
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)2.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.92
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [1.4, 3.5]
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =353, 356)44.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 45.93
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-0.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.42
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 336)-1.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.62
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =311, 311)-1.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.71
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =311, 311)-8.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.78
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =353, 356)45.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 52.3
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 336)-10.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 20.16
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-11.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.19
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-12.9, -8.3]
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)137.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.38
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)0.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 26.53
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =329, 336)5.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35.91
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =312, 314)1.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 33.93
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =312, 314)-53.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 51.1
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)140.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 43.48
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =329, 336)-63.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 44.37
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-69.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 43.53
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-74.7, -64.6]
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)0.7 ratioStandard Deviation 0.18
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0.12
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 335)0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 313)0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0.14
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 313)-0.3 ratioStandard Deviation 0.25
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)0.7 ratioStandard Deviation 0.21
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 335)-0.3 ratioStandard Deviation 0.24
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-0.3 ratioStandard Deviation 0.21
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-0.4, -0.3]
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-0.4, -0.3]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-0.3, -0.2]
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)4.0 ratioStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =329, 336)0.1 ratioStandard Deviation 0.93
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =312, 314)0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0.85
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =312, 314)-1.2 ratioStandard Deviation 1.35
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)4.1 ratioStandard Deviation 1.26
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =329, 336)-1.5 ratioStandard Deviation 1.21
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio of Fasting Total Cholesterol to High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C Ratio) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-1.6 ratioStandard Deviation 1.17
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-1.7, -1.4]
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-1.7, -1.4]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-1.4, -1]
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 315)1.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35.18
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)186.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 40.04
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 340)0.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 27.64
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 337)5.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35.83
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 337)-60.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 43.33
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 315)-51.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 49.68
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 340)-66.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42.38
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)189.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 44.68
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-72.2, -62.1]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Type 1 or 3 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site Reactions

Type 1 hypersensitivity or allergic reactions were possible in response to any injected protein and included shortness of breath, urticaria, anaphylaxis and angioedema. Type 3 hypersensitivity reactions were similar to Type 1 hypersensitivity reactions but were likely to be delayed from the time of injection and included symptoms such as rash, urticaria, polyarthritis, myalgia's, polysynovitis, fever and if severe then included glomerulonephritis as well. Injection site reactions included injection site bruising, discolouration, erythema, haematoma, haemorrhage, nodule, induration, pain, pruritus and rash. Participants with type 1 or type 3 hypersensitivity reactions and participants with injection site reactions were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline up to the end of study (up to 58 weeks)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Type 1 or 3 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site ReactionsType 1 or 3 hypersensitivity reactions2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Type 1 or 3 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site ReactionsInjection site reactions5 participants
PF-04950615 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Type 1 or 3 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site ReactionsInjection site reactions42 participants
PF-04950615 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Type 1 or 3 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site ReactionsType 1 or 3 hypersensitivity reactions1 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 100 Milligram Per Deciliter (2.59 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 100 Milligram Per Deciliter (2.59 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 336)41.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 100 Milligram Per Deciliter (2.59 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =332, 336)37.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 100 Milligram Per Deciliter (2.59 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =312, 313)36.9 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 150 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 100 Milligram Per Deciliter (2.59 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 336)87.5 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 150 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 100 Milligram Per Deciliter (2.59 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =332, 336)82.1 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 150 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 100 Milligram Per Deciliter (2.59 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =312, 313)77.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [13.86, 41.64]
Comparison: Week 2495% CI: [9.32, 23.56]
Comparison: Week 5295% CI: [6.36, 15.24]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 70 Milligram Per Deciliter (1.81 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 70 Milligram Per Deciliter (1.81 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 336)5.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 70 Milligram Per Deciliter (1.81 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =332, 336)3.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 70 Milligram Per Deciliter (1.81 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =312, 313)6.4 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 150 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 70 Milligram Per Deciliter (1.81 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 336)76.8 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 150 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 70 Milligram Per Deciliter (1.81 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =332, 336)69.6 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 150 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 70 Milligram Per Deciliter (1.81 Millimoles Per Litre) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =312, 313)61.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [52.09, 173.91]
Comparison: Week 2495% CI: [55.81, 225.52]
Comparison: Week 5295% CI: [17.13, 49.49]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb)

Percentage of participants with at least 1 positive ADA titer or 1 positive nAb titer were reported. Participants with their ADA titer \>=6.23 were considered to be ADA positive and participants with their nAb titer \>=1.58 were considered to be nAb positive.

Time frame: Baseline up to the end of study (up to 58 weeks)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants who received at least 1 dose of PF-04950615 were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb)ADA44 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb)nAb27 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 339)-0.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.05
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)-0.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.77
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 313)0.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.13
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 339)3.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.56
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)4.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.25
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 313)3.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 13
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [1.8, 5.7]
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [3.1, 6.7]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [0.7, 4.6]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =327, 339)-1.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.92
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 335)-3.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.4
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =310, 310)-3.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.76
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =327, 339)-1.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.1
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 335)-1.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.25
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =310, 310)-1.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.91
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-1.9, 1.7]
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-0.1, 3.9]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-1, 3.1]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 335)3.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.39
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 313)1.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.25
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 339)0.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.1
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 339)-51.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.62
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 335)-47.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.43
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 313)-39.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.39
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals and p values from an MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-55.1, -47.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-54.6, -46.6]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-45.2, -36.3]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12 in Participants With Mixed Dyslipidemia

Participants with mixed dyslipidemia are defined as TG level greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L) at pre-randomization.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12 in Participants With Mixed Dyslipidemia-1.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.95
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12 in Participants With Mixed Dyslipidemia-50.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.78
Comparison: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals and p values from an MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-58, -39.3]MMRM
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12 in Participants With Primary Hyperlipidemia

Participants with primary hyperlipidemia are defined as participants with triglycerides (TG) level less than (\<) 200 milligram per decilitre (mg/dL) (2.26 millimoles per litre \[mmol/L\]) at pre-randomization.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12 in Participants With Primary Hyperlipidemia1.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.89
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12 in Participants With Primary Hyperlipidemia-56.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.78
Comparison: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals and p values from an MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-63.4, -54.8]MMRM
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)6.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.52
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52Week 52 (n =311, 313)5.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.69
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)-50.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.36
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52Week 52 (n =311, 313)-40.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.02
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-60.8, -51.2]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-51.8, -41]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-off

Percent change from baseline in fasting LDL-C among participants with TG cut-off of \<200 mg/dL and \>=200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L) were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offTG <200 mg/dL: Week 24 (n =261, 265)7.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.38
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offTG <200 mg/dL: Week 52(n =243, 248)6.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.95
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offTG >=200 mg/dL: Week 24(n =70, 71)3.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 24.3
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offTG >=200 mg/dL: Week 52(n =68, 65)2.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.74
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offTG >=200 mg/dL: Week 52(n =68, 65)-40.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.01
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offTG <200 mg/dL: Week 24 (n =261, 265)-50.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.9
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offTG >=200 mg/dL: Week 24(n =70, 71)-46.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.05
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 and 52 by Triglyceride Cut-offTG <200 mg/dL: Week 52(n =243, 248)-41.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.35
Comparison: TG \<200 mg/dL (Week 24): LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region.95% CI: [-63.1, -52]
Comparison: TG \<200 mg/dL (Week 52): LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region.95% CI: [-53.9, -41.5]
Comparison: TG \>=200 mg/dL (Week 24): LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region.95% CI: [-58.9, -39.8]
Comparison: TG \>=200 mg/dL (Week 52): LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region.95% CI: [-52.2, -30.1]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 340)5.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.9
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)7.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.79
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 315)0.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.33
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 340)-9.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 42
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)-13.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.24
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 315)-9.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 48.47
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-19.9, -8.5]
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-25.1, -14.7]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-15.7, -2.8]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n= 330, 339)1.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.24
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =329, 336)1.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.78
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =312, 314)2.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.73
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n= 330, 339)6.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.24
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =329, 336)7.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.91
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =312, 314)5.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 16.59
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals and p values from an MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.4, 7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [4.5, 9.1]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [0.9, 5.8]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 339)4.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 84.86
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)1.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 51.82
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =311, 311)1.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.47
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 339)1.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 508.44
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)4.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 465.24
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =311, 311)17.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 562.63
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals and p values from an MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.p-value: 0.8695% CI: [-35.4, 29.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-47.2, 51.4]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-44.5, 70.4]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 339)1.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.53
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =329, 336)4.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.81
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =312, 314)2.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.22
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 339)-50.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.28
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =329, 336)-46.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.52
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non HDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =312, 314)-38.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.32
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals and p values from an MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-55.2, -48.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-54.9, -46.4]
Comparison: Week 52:LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-45.8, -36.5]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 340)1.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.85
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 337)3.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.35
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 315)1.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 18.5
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 340)-35.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.23
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 337)-31.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.47
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 315)-27.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.57
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals and p values from an MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-38.8, -33.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-37.7, -31.7]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-32.3, -25.7]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 340)5.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.9
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)7.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.79
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 315)0.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.33
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =330, 340)-9.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 42
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =331, 336)-13.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.24
PF-04950615 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =313, 315)-9.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 48.47
Comparison: Week 12: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-19.9, -8.5]
Comparison: Week 24: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-25.1, -14.7]
Comparison: Week 52: LS-mean difference, associated 95% confidence intervals with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, treatment group\*visit interaction, baseline value, baseline value\*visit interaction, geographical region, triglyceride subgroup.95% CI: [-15.7, -2.8]
Secondary

Plasma PF-04950615 Concentrations at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Week 12, 24, 52

Population: Analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of PF-04950615. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPlasma PF-04950615 Concentrations at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 12 (n =332)5.53 microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 5.666
PlaceboPlasma PF-04950615 Concentrations at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 24 (n =327)5.36 microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 6.029
PlaceboPlasma PF-04950615 Concentrations at Week 12, 24 and 52Week 52 (n =306)4.07 microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 4.947
Other Pre-specified

Absolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)147.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.25
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)-1.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.46
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 336)-2.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.33
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 313)-0.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.56
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 313)3.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 18.86
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)147.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.96
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 336)5.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.53
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-I (ApoA-I) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 339)4.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 18.32
Other Pre-specified

Absolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =353, 356)38.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.46
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =327, 339)-0.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.95
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 335)-1.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.65
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =310, 310)-1.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.54
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =310, 310)-0.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.15
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =353, 356)38.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.58
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 335)-1.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.07
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in ApolipoproteinA-II (ApoA-II) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =327, 339)-0.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.63
Other Pre-specified

Absolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 52

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 340)3.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 57.04
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 315)-7.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 64.14
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 336)5.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 64.34
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)149.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 66.83
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 12 (n =330, 340)-23.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 71.52
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Baseline (n =354, 357)156.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 78.75
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 24 (n =331, 336)-28.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 68.41
PF-04950615 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) at Week 12, 24 and 52Change at Week 52 (n =313, 315)-24.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 82.21

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026