Skip to content

Use of Teach Back to Improve Comprehension of Discharge Instructions for Emergency Patients With Limited Health Literacy

The Impact of Teach-back on Comprehension of Discharge Instructions Among Emergency Patients With Limited Health Literacy: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01968291
Enrollment
254
Registered
2013-10-24
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2013-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conditions Influencing Health Status

Keywords

Health Literacy, Teach-back, Emergency

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of teach-back discharge instructions improve patient satisfaction and patients' self-reported and objective comprehension of discharge instructions in the emergency department when compared to standard discharge instructions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTeach-back

Patients are asked to repeat back in their own words their understanding of the discharge information that was provided to them.

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients being discharged from the emergency department * A score of 6 or less on the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, Revised (consistent with Limited Health Literacy)

Exclusion criteria

* aphasia, * non-English speaking, * mental handicap, * psychiatric chief complaint, * too high acuity per physician, * insurmountable communication barrier, * evaluations for sexual assault, * clinical intoxication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective comprehensionQuestions evaluating comprehension were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).Concordance between audio taped comprehension compared to review of medical record using 5 level scale of concordance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
self-reported comprehensionQuestions evaluating self-reported comprehension were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).self reported comprehension of discharge instructions for the following areas: emergency department (ED) course (Tests and treatment); Post-ED care (medication instructions; home instructions; follow-up instructions); Return instructions.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient satisfactionQuestions evaluating satisfaction were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).Patient satisfaction as measured by 4 questions modified from the Consumer Assessment of Health Providers & Systems (CAHPS) Clinician & Group Surveys

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026